The commentary of the judgment of the Provincial Administrative Court in Bydgoszcz of August 18, 2020 (I SA/Bd 101/20)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1509-877X.2021.02.01

Keywords:

tax law, tax liability, tax court, illegal representation of other person, Tax Ordinance

Abstract

The commentary is devoted to the analysis of the judgment of the Provincial Administrative Court in Bydgoszcz of August 18, 2020 (I SA/Bd 101/20). The issue is understanding of Art. 113 of the General Tax Law (1997), according to which the awareness of the person who illegally represents of taxpayer as to the purpose of activity of the latter determines its responsibility for the tax arrears. The author criticizes the interpretation of the provision by tax court, especially in the context of the facts of the case.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brzeziński B., Glosa do wyroku WSA w Lublinie z 22.01.2019 r. (I SA/Lu 48/19), „Przegląd Orzecznictwa Podatkowego” 2019, nr 4.
Google Scholar

Olesińska A., Odpowiedzialność osób trzecich za zobowiązania podatkowe, Toruń 1994.
Google Scholar

Olesińska A., Odpowiedzialność osób trzecich za zobowiązania podatkowe, Lublin 2000.
Google Scholar

Published

2021-06-30

How to Cite

Brzeziński, B. (2021). The commentary of the judgment of the Provincial Administrative Court in Bydgoszcz of August 18, 2020 (I SA/Bd 101/20). Tax Law Quarterly, (2), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.18778/1509-877X.2021.02.01

Issue

Section

Articles

PlumX metrics

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>