New working spaces in management sciences: a systematic review and knowledge transfer for socioeconomic geography

Alicja Koperska

doi:10.18778/1733-3180.36.02

Autor

Alicja Koperska Poznan University of Economics and Business, Department of Labour and Social Policy https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2075-7732

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-3180.36.02

Słowa kluczowe:

nowe przestrzenie współpracy, organizacje kooperacyjne, fablab, makerspace, hackerspace

Abstrakt

Nowe przestrzenie pracy [ang. new working spaces (NWS)] stanowią innowacyjną formę organizowania działalności, odbiegającą od tradycyjnego rozumienia organizacji. Charakteryzują się otwartym członkostwem. Łączą rzemieślników, artystów i twórców działających jako freelancerzy lub prowadzących mikroprzedsiębiorstwa. Szczególną kategorią NWS są przestrzenie współpracy takie jak makerspace, hackerspace i fab lab, które – w przeciwieństwie do podobnych doń biur coworkingowych – koncentrują się na działalności produkcyjnej, konstrukcyjnej i rzemieślniczej. Często wykorzystują zaawansowane technologie. Przestrzenie te nie tylko zapewniają dostęp do infrastruktury technicznej, ale również tworzą środowisko wspierające rozwój poprzez wymianę wiedzy i networking. Badania nad NWS rozwijają się w ramach dwóch głównych dyscyplin: geografii społeczno-ekonomicznej oraz nauk o zarządzaniu. O ile geografia społecznoekonomiczna koncentruje się na wzorcach rozmieszczenia przestrzennego, wpływie na lokalną gospodarkę i dynamice rozwoju regionalnego, o tyle nauki o zarządzaniu wniosły istotny wkład w zrozumienie aspektów organizacyjnych nowych przestrzeni pracy, budowania weń społeczności i mechanizmów zachodzących tam procesów innowacyjnych. Wobec rosnącej liczby tego typu przestrzeni w Polsce i jednoczesnego niedoboru badań łączących perspektywę zarządzania z geograficzną, można założyć istnienie potrzeby pogłębienia transferu wiedzy między tymi dyscyplinami. Prezentowany artykuł to systematyczny przegląd literatury na temat makerspace’ów, hackerspace’ów i fab lab’ów w naukach społecznych, ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem badań użytecznych dla badaczy zagadnień z zakresu geografii społeczno-ekonomicznej. Artykuł prezentuje dorobek naukowy z różnych dyscyplin. Obejmuje główne nurty badawcze dotyczące przestrzeni współpracy, kluczowe koncepcje i ustalenia empiryczne. Jednym z jego celów jest ułatwienie badaczom geografii społeczno-ekonomicznej dostępu do ustaleń dotyczących NWS z zakresu nauk o zarządzaniu i nauk pokrewnych. Do przygotowania przeglądu wykorzystano dwa narzędzia służące analizom bibliometrycznym – Bibliometrix oraz VOSviewer. Artykuł może służyć jako punkt wyjścia do dalszych badań nad NWS, łączących perspektywę organizacyjną z geograficzną.

Pobrania

Brak dostępnych danych do wyświetlenia.

Bibliografia

Akhavan M., Astolfi L., Canevari A., Mariotti I., 2018, Coworking Spaces and New Social Relations: A Focus on Italy, [in:] City Street3 Conference, Notre Dame University Louaize (FAAD), 31 October – 3 November, Lebanon (pp. 1–18). LBN. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci3010002
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci3010002

Akhavan M., Hölzel M., Leducq D., 2023, Introduction to the Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Coworking, [in:] M. Akhavan, M. Hölzel, D. Leducq (eds), European Narratives on Remote Working and Coworking During the COVID-19 Pandemic, SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology(), Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26018-6_1
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26018-6

Allen D.W., 2017, Hackerspaces as entrepreneurial anarchy, Available at SSRN 2749016. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2749016
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2749016

Ananian P., Shearmur R., Borde M.A., Lachapelle U., Paulhiac F., Tremblay D.G., Rodrigue T., 2024, Coworking spaces in Montreal (Canada): Moving beyond classic location patterns, “Geoforum”, 152, 104016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104016
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104016

Anderson C., 2012, Makers: The new industrial revolution, Crown, New York.
Google Scholar

Assenza P., 2015, If you build it will they come? The influence of spatial configuration on social and cognitive functioning and knowledge spillover in entrepreneurial co-working and hacker spaces, “Journal of Management Policy and Practice”, 16(3): 35–48.
Google Scholar

Bednář P., Mariotti I., Rossi F., Danko L., 2021, The Evolution of Coworking Spaces in Milan and Prague: Spatial Patterns, Diffusion and Urban Change, [in:] M. Orel, O. Dvouletý, V. Ratten (eds), The Flexible Workplace. Human Resource Management, Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62167-4_4
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62167-4_4

Beltagui A., Sesis A., Stylos N., 2021, A bricolage perspective on democratising innovation: The case of 3D printing in makerspaces, “Technological Forecasting and Social Change”, 163, 120453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120453
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120453

Bosworth G., Whalley J., Fuzi A., Merrell,I., Chapman P., Russell E., 2023, Rural co-working: New network spaces and new opportunities for a smart countryside, “Journal of Rural Studies”, 97: 550–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.01.003
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.01.003

Botsman R.R., Rogers W., 2011, How Collaborative Consumption is Changing the Way We Live, ed. R. Botsman, R. Rogers, HarperCollinsPublishers, London.
Google Scholar

Bouncken R., Clauß T., Reuschl A., 2016, Coworking-spaces in Asia: A Business Model Design Perspective.
Google Scholar

Bouncken R.B., Fredrich V., Ritala P., Kraus S., 2018, Coopetition in new product development alliances: advantages and tensions for incremental and radical innovation, “British Journal of Management”, 29(3): 391–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12213
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12213

Bouncken R.B., Reuschl A.J., 2016, Coworking-spaces: How a phenomenon of the sharing economy builds a novel trend for the workplace and for entrepreneurship, “Review of Managerial Science”, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-016-0215-y
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-016-0215-y

Brafman O., Beckstrom R.A., 2006, The starfish and the spider: The unstoppable power of leaderless organizations, Penguin, New York.
Google Scholar

Brouwer A.E., Mariotti I., 2023, Remote Working and New Working Spaces During the COVID-19 Pandemic – Insights from EU and Abroad, [in:] M. Akhavan, M. Hölzel, D. Leducq (eds), European Narratives on Remote Working and Coworking During the COVID-19 Pandemic, “SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology”(), Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26018-6_2
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26018-6_2

Browder R.E., Aldrich H.E., Bradley S.W., 2019, The emergence of the maker movement: implications for entrepreneurship research, “Journal of Business Venturing”, 34: 459–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2019.01.005
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2019.01.005

Burret A., Pierre X., 2014, The added value of co-working spaces in the area of business development support: Encouraging peer networks, “Revue de l’Entrepreneuriat”, 13(1): 51–73. https://doi.org/10.3917/entre.131.0051
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/entre.131.0051

Butcher T., 2016, Co-working communities: Sustainability citizenship at work, [in:] R. Horne, J. Fien, B.B. Beza, A. Nelson (eds), Sustainability Citizenship in Cities: Theory and practice. Advances in Urban Sustainability, Routledge, Abingdon–Oxon: 93–103.
Google Scholar

Capdevila I., 2015, Co-working spaces and the localised dynamics of innovation in Barcelona, “International Journal of Innovation Management”, 19(03), 1540004. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919615400046
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919615400046

Capdevila I., 2017, Knowing communities and the innovative capacity of cities, “City, Culture and Society”. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2017.05.003
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2017.05.003

Castilho M.F., Quandt C.O., 2017, “Convenience Sharing” or “Community Building”: Collaborative capability in coworking spaces. In 28th ISPIM Innovation Symposium. Composing the Innovation Symphony, 18–21 June, Vienna.
Google Scholar

Chon H., Abu Bakar N.H., 2018, Collective Individualism in Design. To Get There: Designing Together. Cumulus Conference Proceedings Paris 2018, Cumulus International Association of Universities and Colleges of Art, Design and Media.
Google Scholar

Dale K., Burrell G., 2007, The spaces of organisation and the organisation of space: Power, identity and materiality at work, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350389373
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350389373

Dandoy A., 2016, Collaborative communities and their roles in education in the city (No. hal-01919899).
Google Scholar

Danko L., Bednář P., Lux G., Kalman J., Belvončíková E., Horeczki R., Bálint D., 2024, Coworking Spaces and Mid‐Sized Cities in Peripheral Contexts: Conceptualising Development Trajectories, “Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie”, 115(5): 706–720. https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12622
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12622

D’Andria A., Gabarret I., 2017, The entrepreneurial connection, [in:] A. d’Andria, I. Gabarret (eds), Building 21st century entrepreneurship, pp. 73–92, Wiley, London. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119419709.ch4
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119419709.ch4

Derviş H., 2019, Bibliometric analysis using Bibliometrix an R Package, “Journal of Scientometric Research”, 8(3): 156–160. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.8.3.32
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.8.3.32

Diez T., 2012, Personal fabrication: Fab labs as platforms for citizen-based innovation, from microcontrollers to cities, “Nexus Network Journal”, 14(3): 457–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-012-0131-7
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-012-0131-7

Dougherty D., 2012, The maker movement, “Innovations”, 7(3): 11–14. https://doi.org/10.1162/INOV_a_00135
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/INOV_a_00135

van Eck N.J., Waltman L., 2017, Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer, “Scientometrics”, 111(2): 1053–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7

Frick J.A., 2015, A comparative study of entrepreneurial clusters and co-working spaces in Norway: The sudden boom of private initiatives from 2010–2015, [in:] Operations Management for Sustainable Competitiveness, 22nd Conference of European Operation Management Association (Euroma 2015), June 26–July 1, Neuchatel, Switzerland.
Google Scholar

Fuzi A., 2015, Co-working spaces for promoting entrepreneurship in sparse regions: the case of South Wales, “Regional Studies, Regional Science”, 2(1): 462–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2015.1072053
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2015.1072053

Fuzi A., Clifton N., Loudon G., 2014, New in-house organizational spaces that suport creativity and innovation: the co-working space, R&D Management Conference 2014, 3–6 June, Stuttgart.
Google Scholar

Gandini A., 2015, The rise of coworking spaces: A literature review, “Ephemera Journal: Theory and Politics in Organisation”, 15(1): 193–205.
Google Scholar

Gauntlett D., 2011, Media studies 2.0 and other battles around the future of media research.
Google Scholar

Gertner D., Mack E., 2017, The Entrepreneurial Orientation (EO) of incubators, accelerators and co-working spaces, “International Journal of Regional Development”, 4(2): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijrd.v4i2.10210
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/ijrd.v4i2.10210

Gerdenitsch C., Scheel T.E., Andorfer J., Korunka C., 2016, Coworking spaces: A source of social support for independent professionals, “Frontiers in Psychology”, 7, 581. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00581
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00581

Grant M.J., Booth A., 2009, A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies, “Health Information & Libraries Journal”, 26(2): 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

DeGuzman G.V., Tang A.I., 2011, Working in the unoffice: A guide to coworking for indie workers, small businesses and nonprofits, Night Owls Press LLC.
Google Scholar

Hackley C., 2013, Marketing in context: Setting the scene, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137297112
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137297112

Hatch M., 2013, The maker movement manifesto: Rules for innovation in the new world of crafters, hackers and tinkerers, McGraw Hill Professional, New York.
Google Scholar

Holienka M., Racek F., 2015, Coworking spaces in Slovakia, “Management Review”, 9(2): 29–43.
Google Scholar

van Holm E.J., 2014, What are Makerspaces, Hackerspaces and Fab Labs? Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2548211 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2548211
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2548211

Huang H., Liu Y., Liang Y., Vargas D., Zhang L., 2020, Spatial perspectives on coworking spaces and related practices in Beijing, “Built Environment”, 46(1): 40–54. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.46.1.40
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.46.1.40

Hurry C.J., 2012, The Hub Halifax: A qualitative study on coworking, MBA Research Project, St. Mary’s University, Halifax, Nova Scotia.
Google Scholar

Janssens F., Glänzel W., De Moor B., 2008, A hybrid mapping of information science, “Scientometrics”, 75(3): 607–631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-2002-7
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-2002-7

Kostakis V., Niaros V., Giotitsas C., 2015, Open source 3D printing as a means of learning: An educational experiment in two high schools in Greece, “Telematics and informatics”, 32(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2014.05.001
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2014.05.001

DeKoven B., 2002, The well-played game: A playful path to wholeness, iUniverse, Bloomington.
Google Scholar

de Lange T., Wittek L., 2018, Creating shared spaces: developing teaching through peer supervision, “Mind, Culture and Activity”, 25: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2018.1544645
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2018.1544645

Leducq D., Demazière C., 2023, Narratives on COVID-19 Effects on Coworking Spaces in France: A Winning Ticket for the Peripheries?, [in:] M. Akhavan, M. Hölzel, D. Leducq (eds), European Narratives on Remote Working and Coworking During the COVID-19 Pandemic, SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology(), Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26018-6_4
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26018-6_4

Levy S., 2001, Crypto: How the code rebels beat the government – saving privacy in the digital age, Penguin.
Google Scholar

Mariotti I., Akhavan M., Rossi F., 2023, The preferred location of coworking spaces in Italy: an empirical investigation in urban and peripheral areas, “European Planning Studies”, 31(3): 467–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1895080
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1895080

Mariotti I., Di Vita S., Akhavan M (2021), New Workplaces-Location Patterns, Urban Effects and Development Trajectories (pp. 53–63), Springer International Publishing, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63443-8_4
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63443-8

Mariotti I., Pacchi C., 2021, Coworkers and coworking spaces as urban transformation actors. An Italian perspective, [in:] I. Mariotti, S. Di Vita, M. Akhavan (eds), New workplaces – location patterns, urban effects and development trajectories. Research for development, pp. 53–63, Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63443-8_4
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63443-8_4

Maxigas P., 2012, Hacklabs and hackerspaces: Tracing two genealogies, “Journal of Peer Production”, 2.
Google Scholar

McKay G. (ed.), 1998, DiY culture: party and protest in nineties’ Britain, Verso.
Google Scholar

Méndez‐Ortega C., Smit M.J., Micek G., 2024, Location patterns and drivers of coworking spaces in European regions, “Tijdschrift voor economische en socjale geografie”, 115(2): 281–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12603
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12603

Méndez-Ortega C., Micek G., Malochleb K., 2022, How do coworking spaces coagglomerate with service industries?, “The tale of three European cities. Cities”, 130, 103875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103875
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103875

Micek G., Baycan T., Lange B., 2024, A Taxonomy of New Working Spaces, [in:] I. Mariotti, E. Tomaz, G. Micek, C. Méndez-Ortega (eds), Evolution of New Working Spaces, “SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology”(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50868-4_3
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50868-4_3

Moriset B., 2014, Building new places of the creative economy. The rise of coworking spaces, proceedings of the 2nd Geography of Innovation, International Conference 2014, Utrecht University, Utrecht (The Netherlands).
Google Scholar

Mengual P., Danzinger F., Roth A., 2023, Physical interaction platforms: A taxonomy of spaces for interactive value creation, Creativity and Innovation Management.
Google Scholar

Oldenburg R., 1989, The great good place: Cafés, coffee shops, community centers, beauty parlors, general stores, bars, hangouts and how they get you through the day, Paragon House Publishers, Vadnais Heights, Minnesota.
Google Scholar

Paré G., Trudel M.C., Jaana M., Kitsiou S., 2015, Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews, “Information & Management”, 52(2): 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008

Pompa L., 2017, From the unusual to the useful: Digital platforms and co-working spaces as instruments for human resource management in emerging economic and organizational environments, “International Journal of Business and Management”, 12(8): 143–159. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v12n8p143
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v12n8p143

Qiu Y., Bouncken R.B., Arndt F., Ng W., 2023, Microfoundations and dynamics of do-ityourself ecosystems, “Technological Forecasting and Social Change”, 193, 122611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122611
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122611

Raffaele C., Connell J., 2016, Telecommuting and co-working communities: What are the implications for individual and organizational flexibility? [in:] J. Connell, J. Burgess (eds.), Flexible work organizations: The challenges of capacity building in Asia, pp. 21–35, Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2834-9_2
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2834-9_2

Ratto M., Boler M., 2014, DIY Citizenship, Critical Making and Social Media, The MIT Press, 10, 2.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9568.001.0001

Schmidt S., Brinks V., 2017, Open creative labs: Spatial settings at the intersection of communities and organizations, “Creativity and Innovation Management”, 26(3): 291–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12220
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12220

Smit M.J., Schutjens V., Brouwer A., 2023, Not going back to the office any time soon: Coworking spaces in The Netherlands, [in:] M. Akhavan, M. Hölzel, D. Leducq (eds), European narratives on remote working and coworking during the COVID-19 pandemic: A multidisciplinary perspective, pp. 63–72, Springer, Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26018-6_7.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26018-6_7

Soerjoatmodjo G., Bagasworo D., Joshua G., Kalesaran T., van den Broek K., 2015, Sharing workspace, sharing knowledge: Knowledge sharing amongst entrepreneurs in Jakarta co-working spaces, International Conference on Intellectual Capital and Knowledge Management and Organisational Learning (p. 259), Academic Conferences International Limited.
Google Scholar

Spreitzer G., Bacevice P., Garrett L., 2015, Why people thrive in coworking spaces, “Harvard Business Review”, 93(7): 28–30.
Google Scholar

Tomaz E., Henriques C., 2023, The evolution and spatial dynamics of coworking spaces in Lisbon: a qualitative analysis, “Cidades. Comunidades e Territórios”, 46. https://doi.org/10.15847/cct.31140
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.15847/cct.31140

Tomaz E., Moriset B., Teller J., 2022, Rural coworking spaces in the COVID-19 era: A window of opportunity?, [in:] The COVID-19 pandemic and the future of working spaces, pp. 122–135, Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003181163-12
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003181163-12

Walter-Herrmann J., 2013, Fab Labs – A Global Social Movement, FabLab: Of machines, makers and inventors. https://doi.org/10.1515/transcript.9783839423820
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/transcript.9783839423820

Van Weele M.A., Van Rijnsoever F.J., Steinz H., 2014, Start-ups down under: How start-up communities facilitate Australian entrepreneurship, In DRUID (Dynamics of Organizations, Industries, Systems and Regions) Society Conference, Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen, June 16–18 (27 pp.).
Google Scholar

Wolf M., McQuitty S., 2011, Understanding the do-it-yourself consumer: DIY motivations and outcomes, “AMS Review”, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-011-0021-2
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-011-0021-2

Zakoth D., Mauroner O., Emes J., 2023, The role of makerspaces in innovation processes: an exploratory study, R&D Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12594
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12594

Zhai L., 2021, How do socioeconomic and urban form factors affect the spatial distribution of coworking spaces? The case of Shanghai, China, University of Washington.
Google Scholar

Zhang S., Mendez-Ortega C., Mariotti I., 2024, Location dynamics of coworking spaces in China: Insights from Beijing metropolitan, “Regional Studies, Regional Science”, 11(1): 523–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2024.2381641
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2024.2381641