The LEADER programme in Central Europe. A new local development policies.

Pascal Chevalier; Marie-Claude Maurel

doi:10.18778/0208-600X.44.04

Authors

Pascal Chevalier Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales
Marie-Claude Maurel Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier 3, Department of Geography and Land Management; Research Centre ART-Dev (UMR 5281)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-600X.44.04

Keywords:

LEADER programme, local development, European Rural Development Policy, policy transfer, Central Europe

Abstract

The implementation of a new European policy based on integrated rural development is an entirely new experiment in the Central European countries, which formerly belonged to the communist system. This paper explores the conditions and the context in which the Local Development Model is being transferred from former member states to new ones, and the way it has been implemented. To examine this issue, we consider the European Union’s Leader programme (an acronym of Liaisons Entre Actions de Développement de l’Economie Rurale), which became the fourth axis of the European Rural Policy (2007–2013). The Leader approach is usually presented as an original way of supporting local development, especially through a Local action group (LAG), which is a local body constituted of public and private stakeholders. We focus on how this approach is put into effects in five post-communist states, four of which are new EU members. (Czech Republic, Hungary, Lithuania, eastern Germany and Poland). Downloading policy to the local communities takes place via various hierarchical modes of governance. Domestic authorities (or transfer operators) transpose and implement European rules and norms, which are more flexible than the former development policies. Looking at the main differences between the countries we explore how the original model is being distorted by domestic institutional factors. Policy transfer processes are not restricted to ministries of agriculture but involve a wide variety of nongovernmental actors mediating the policy transfer to the local stakeholders, who are the acting receivers. The Leader model is experimented in various territorial and social contexts, some more and some less receptive to this new way of thinking and managing local development. This paper is based on the relevant academic literature, on official national sources, and a field research survey. It is a cross-national comparative work that takes into account national and local variations in order to highlight similarities and differences in the transfer of a policy model.

References

Chevalier P. (2012), Le transfert du modèle européen LEADER: entre diffusion des normes et durcissement réglementaire, „Revue d’Etudes Comparatives Est-Ouest”, no 3, pp. 17‒55.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/receo.433.0017

Davezies L. (2008), La République et ses territoires. La circulation des richesses, Seuil, Coll. „La République des Idées”, Paris.
Google Scholar

Deberre J.-C. (2007), Décentralisation et développement local, „Afrique contemporaine”, no 1, pp. 45‒54.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/afco.221.0045

Dedeire M., Mačiulytė J. (2012), Les communautés rurales, nouveaux acteurs du développement local en Lituanie, „Revue d’études comparatives Est-Ouest”, no 3, pp. 145‒172.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/receo.433.0145

Hall P. A. (1993), Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain, „Comparative Politics”, no 25, pp. 275‒297.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/422246

Kovách I., Kučerova E. (2006), The Project Class in Central Europe: The Czech and Hungarian Cases, „Sociologia Ruralis”, vol. 46, no 1, pp. 3–19.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00403.x

Lascoumes P., Simard L. (2011), L’action publique au prisme de ses instruments, „Revue française de science politique”, vol. 61, no 1, pp. 5‒22.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/rfsp.611.0005

Maurel M.-C. (2004), Les collectivités locales d’Europe centre-orientale: des territoires politiques en recomposition, [in:] V. Rey, L. Coudroy de Lille, E. Boulineau, L’élargissement de l’UE: réformes territoriales en Europe centrale et orientale, L’Harmattan, Paris, pp. 81‒94.
Google Scholar

Osti G. (2000), LEADER and Partnerships: The case of Italy, „Sociologia Ruralis”, vol. 40, no 2, pp. 172‒180.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00139

Pálné-Kovács I. (2011), Local governance in Hungary – the balance of the last 20 years, „Discussion paper”, no 83, Centre for Regional Studies of Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Pécs.
Google Scholar

Pecqueur B. (2006), Le tournant territorial de l’économie globale, „Espaces et sociétés”, no 124-125, pp. 2‒3.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/esp.124.0017

Radaelli C. (2003), The Europeanization of Public Policy, [in:] K. Featherstone, C. Radaelli (eds.), The Politics of Europeanization, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0199252092.003.0002

Raffestin C. (1980), Pour une géographie du pouvoir, Litec, Paris.
Google Scholar

Rey V. (coord.) (1996), Les nouvelles campagnes d’Europe orientales, CNRS Éditions, Paris.
Google Scholar

Saurugger S., Surel Y. (2006), L’européanisation comme processus de transfert de politique publique, „Revue Internationale de Politique Comparée”, vol. 13, no 2, pp. 179‒211.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/ripc.132.0179

Smith A. (1995), L’Europe politique au miroir du local. Les fonds structurels et les zones rurales en France, en Espagne et au Royaume-Uni, l’Harmattan, Paris.
Google Scholar

Spieser C. (2008), Les fonds structurels européens: quels outils pour faire face aux restructurations?, „Revue Internationale de Droit Economique”, no 22, pp. 2‒24.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/ride.222.0213