Trójkąt niebermudzki: sceny, sieci i ruchy społeczne w rozwoju obszarów nie tylko wiejskich

Marta Klekotko; Krzysztof Gorlach

doi:10.18778/0208-600X.44.03

Authors

Marta Klekotko Instytut Socjologii, Uniwersytet Jagielloński
Krzysztof Gorlach Instytut Socjologii, Uniwersytet Jagielloński

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-600X.44.03

Keywords:

rural development, scenes, networks, social movements

Abstract

The authors try to construct a rather general analytical and conceptual framework that might be useful for considerations focused in rural development. Its frame has been characterised by three various theoretical perspectives (the triangle), namely: theory of social scenes, social networks approach as well as theories of social movements. The first one might be used as a tool to conceptualise of parts of social space (places) that might be recognised as fields of various social practices including not only consumption activities but economic and political performances as well. In turn, social network approach focused mainly on the issue of governance might be used as a tool for description and explanation of the nature and character of relations among social actors playing in particular social scenes and participating in the processes of rural development. Finally, the social movement perspective has been projected for the analysis of particular actors, especially the dynamics of their structuration and actions.

References

Almas R., Lawrence G. (eds.) (2003), Globalization, Localization and Sustainable Livelihoods, Ashgate, Aldershot.
Google Scholar

Bell D., Jayne M. (eds.) (2006), Small Cities: Urban Experience beyond the Metropolis, Routledge, New York–Oxon.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203019269

Bradley A., Hall T. (2006), The festiwal phenomenon. Festivals, events and the promotion of small urban areas, [w:] D. Bell, M. Jayne (eds.), Small Cities: Urban Experience beyond the Metropolis, Routledge, New York–Oxon, s. 77–89.
Google Scholar

Clark T. N. (2004), The city as an entertainment machine, Elsevier, Oxford.
Google Scholar

Clark T. N. (2009), The New Chicago School – not New York or L.A. and Why it Matters for Urban Social Science, Chicago, (typescript).
Google Scholar

Clark T. N., Lloyd R., Wong K. K., Jaiun P. (2001), Amenities Drive Urban Growth?, „Journal of Urban Affairs”, Vol. 24, No. 5, s. 493–515.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9906.00134

Curtis R. L., Zurcher L. A. (1973), Stable resources of protest movements. Multi-organizational field, „Social Forces”, Vol. 52, No. 1, s. 53–61.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2576423

Della Porta D., Diani M. (2009), Ruchy społeczne. Wprowadzenie, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków.
Google Scholar

Dibben J., Cocklin C. (2005), Sustainability and Agri-Environmental Governance, [w:] V. Higgins, G. Lawrence (eds.), Agricultural Governmance: Globalization and the New Politics of Regulation, Routledge, London–New York, s. 135–152.
Google Scholar

Evans G., Foord J. (2006), Small cities for a small country: sustaining the cultural renaissance?, [w:] D. Bell, M. Jayne (eds.), Small Cities: Urban Experience beyond the Metropolis, Routledge, New York–Oxon, s. 151–167.
Google Scholar

Ewert J. (2003), Co-operatives to Companies: The South African Wine Industry in the Face of Globalization, [w:] R. Almas, G. Lawrence (eds.), Globalization, Localization and Sustainable Livelihoods, Ashgate, Aldershot, s. 153–169.
Google Scholar

Goodwin J., Kasper J. M. (eds.) (2009), The Social Movements Reader. Cases and Concepts, Wiley-Blackwell, Chicherster–Malden (MA).
Google Scholar

Hall T. (1998), Urban Geography, Routledge, London.
Google Scholar

Higgins V., Lawrence G. (eds.) (2005), Agricultural Governmance: Globalization and the New Politics of Regulation, Routledge, London–New York.
Google Scholar

Klekotko M. (2012), Rozwój po śląsku: procesy kapitalizacji kultury w społeczności górniczej, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków.
Google Scholar

Klekotko M., Gorlach K. (2011), Miejsce, lokalność, globalizacja. Przyczynek do problematyki socjologii wsi (i nie tylko) w społeczeństwie ponowoczesnym, [w:] H. Podedworna, A. Pilichowski (red.), Obszary wiejskie w Polsce. Różnorodność i procesy różnicowania, IFiS PAN – Polskie Towarzystwo Socjologiczne, Warszawa, s. 22–55.
Google Scholar

Kooiman J. (2003), Governing as Governance, SAGE Publications, London.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446215012

Leach D. K., Haunss S. (2009), Scenes and Social Movements, [w:] H. Johnston (ed.), Culture, Social Movements and Protest, Burlington, Ashgate, s. 255–276.
Google Scholar

Navarro C. J. (2012), Introducción, [w:] C. J. Navarro (red.), Las dimensiones culturales de la ciudad, Catarata, Madrid, s. 7–11.
Google Scholar

Page S. (1995), Urban Tourism, Routledge, London.
Google Scholar

Pakulski J. (2009), Postmodern social theory, [w:] B. S. Turner (ed.), The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory, Wiley-Blackwell, Malden (MA)–Oxford–Chichester, s. 251–280.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444304992.ch13

Peine E., McMichael P. (2005), Globalization and Global Governance, [w:] V. Higgins, G. Lawrence (eds.), Agricultural Governmance: Globalization and the New Politics of Regulation, Routledge, London–New York, s. 19–34.
Google Scholar

Perkins H. C. (2006), Commodification: re-resourcing rural areas, [w:] P. Cloke, T. Marsden, P. H. Mooney (eds.), Handbook of Rural Studies, Sage Publications, London–Thousand Oaks–New Delhi, s. 342–257.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608016.n17

Ray C. (2006), Neo-Endogenous Rural Development in the EU, [w:] P. Cloke, T. Marsden, P. H. Mooney (eds.), Handbook of Rural Studies, SAGE Publications, London–Thousand Oaks–New Delhi, s. 278–291.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608016.n19

Rucht D. (2007), Movement allies, adversaries, and third parties, [w:] D. D. Snow, S. A. Soule, H. Kriesi (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, Blackwell Publishing, Malden (MA)–Oxford–Carlton, s. 197–216.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470999103.ch9

Shucksmith M. (2012), Class, power and inequality in rural areas: beyond social exclusion?, „Sociologia Ruralis”, Vol. 52, No. 4, s. 377–397.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2012.00570.x

Silver D., Clark T. N., Graziul Ch. (2011), Scenes, innovation and urban development, [w:] D. E. Anderson, A. E. Anderson, Ch. Mellander (eds.), Handbook of Crative Cities, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham–Northampton, s. 229–258.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857936394.00019

Silver D., Clark T. N., Navarro C. J. (2010), Scenes: social context in an age of contingency, „Social Forces”, Vol. 88, No. 5, s. 2293–2324.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2010.0041

Silver D., Clark T. N., Rothfield L. (2007), A theory of Scenes, Chicago, University of Chicago, (typescript).
Google Scholar

Snow D. A., Soule S. A., Kriesi H. (eds.) (2007), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, Blackwell Publishing, Malden (MA)–Oxford–Carlton.
Google Scholar

Sztompka P. (2005), Ruchy społeczne – struktury in statu nascendi, [w:] P. Sztompka, M. Kucia (red.), Socjologia. Lektury, Znak, Kraków, s. 225–237.
Google Scholar

Tuan F. Y. (1987), Przestrzeń i miejsce, Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy, Warszawa.
Google Scholar