Metaverse and its creative potential for visual arts

Agata Kępińska; Rafał Wiśniewski

doi:10.18778/0208-600X.85.04

Authors

Agata Kępińska Dział Badań i Analiz, Narodowe Centrum Kultury, ul. Płocka 13, 01-231 Warszawa https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3623-1815
Rafał Wiśniewski Instytut Nauk Socjologicznych, Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie, ul. Wóycickiego 1/3, 01-938 Warszawa https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7952-8021

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-600X.85.04

Keywords:

Metaverse, virtual reality, NFT, digital art, sociology of art

Abstract

The National Centre for Culture is conducting a foresight research project on the impact of emerging technologies on the arts. The article presents the first findings brought by the analysis of opportunities created by the development of virtual spaces accessible to artists and the public – which are expected to create the Metaverse and promote a new form of ownership, NFT. The text is dedicated to the potential of new tools and media – the positive side of the interface between modern technologies and art. The article offers definitions of the Metaverse, NFT and digital art. Apparently, these elements of social (and technological) reality not only overlap, but also complement each other. The text attempts to answer the question of what potential the next phase of digital transformation brings for visual artists.

References

Ball M. (2022), The Metaverse: And How It Will Revolutionize Everything, Liveright Publishing Corporation, New York.
Google Scholar

Bandoch J. (2021), Algorytmy kontra ludzie. Niesocjologiczna analiza wpływu nowych technologii na życie społeczne, “Studia Socjologiczne”, no. 3(242), pp. 165–174.
Google Scholar

Barrière L. (2019), Exploring Randomness in Digital Art, [in:] Proceedings of Bridges 2019: Mathematics, Music, Art, Architecture, Education, Culture, pp. 569–574, Linz, Austria, July 16th – 20th.
Google Scholar

Bashir I. (2023), Mastering Blockchain, PactPublishing (early access).
Google Scholar

Doyle D. (2015), New Opportunities for Artistic Practice in Virtual Worlds, IGI Global, Hershey, https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8384-6
Google Scholar

Hyun-Kyung L., Soobin P., Yeonji L. (2022), A proposal of virtual museum metaverse content for the MZ generation, “Digital Creativity”, vol. 33(2), pp. 79–95, https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2022.2063903
Google Scholar

Khan F., Kothari R., Patel M., Banoth N. (2022), Enhancing Non-Fungible Tokens for the Evolution of Blockchain Technology, [in:] 2022 International Conference on Sustainable Computing and Data Communication Systems (ICSCDS), pp. 1148–1153, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSCDS53736.2022.9760849
Google Scholar

Klütsch C. (2005), The summer 1968 in London and Zagreb: starting or end point for computer art?, [in:] Proceedings of the 5th conference on Creativity & cognition (C&C ’05), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, pp. 109–117, https://doi.org/10.1145/1056224.1056241
Google Scholar

McAndrew C. (ed.) (2022), The Art Market 2022, Art Basel and USB.
Google Scholar

Myoo S. (2012), Lepiej chodźmy zapytać robota… (wstęp do technoantropologii), “Przegląd Filozoficzny. Nowa Seria”, vol. 21, no. 2(82), pp. 363–376, https://doi.org/10.2478/v10271-012-0046-x
Google Scholar

Myoo S. (2016), Twórcze roboty, “Przegląd Filozoficzny. Nowa Seria”, vol. 25, no. 2(98), pp. 115–126.
Google Scholar

Ornes S. (2022), Virtual reality helps shape and respond to artistic impulses, “PNAS”, vol. 119(31), https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2210323119
Google Scholar

P ark S.-M., K im Y.-G. (2022), A Metaverse: Taxonomy, Components, Applications, and Open Challenges, “IEEE Access”, vol. 10, pp. 4209–4251, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3140175
Google Scholar

Postman N. (2004), Technopol. Triumf techniki nad kulturą, transl. A. Tanalska-Dulęba, Wydawnictwo Literackie Muza, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Richter H. (1997), Dada art and anti-art, Thames & Hudson, London.
Google Scholar

Riva G., Wiederhold B.K. (2022), What the Metaverse Is (Really) and Why We Need to Know About It, “Cyberpsychological, Behavior and Social Networking”, no. 25(6), pp. 355–359, https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2022.0124
Google Scholar

Shields R. (2003), The Virtual, Routledge, New York.
Google Scholar

Stephenson N. (2020), Śnieżyca, transl. W. Szypuła, Wydawnictwo Mag, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Toffler A. (2001), Trzecia fala, transl. E. Woydyłło, Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Walewska-Choptiany J. (2021), Cyfrowa dekada. Związki sztuki i technologii w latach 1960–1975, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika, Toruń.
Google Scholar

Whitaker A. (2019), Art and Blockchain. A Primer, History, and Taxonomy of Blockchain Use Cases in the Arts, “Artivate: A Journal of Entrepreneurship in the Arts”, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 21–46, https://doi.org/10.1353/artv.2019.0008
Google Scholar

Wiśniewski R., Bukalska I. (2020), The Interactive Dimension of Creating Cultural Artifacts Using Agile Methodologies, “Qualitative Sociology Review”, vol. 16, no. 4, https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.16.4.12
Google Scholar