Bez sensu as an act of communication
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1505-9057.58.09Keywords:
meaning, communicational grammar, ideation, interaction, conversation, logic, persuasion, manipulation, colloquial discourse, media discourse, political discourseAbstract
The article presents a communication-based analysis of the function of the ‘bez sensu’ [meaningless/ pointless/makes no sense etc.] phraseme. The author discusses the conversational and discursive opportunities for using it. He applies the methodology of communicational grammar, which enables the analysis of communications at the ideational and interactive levels. Within the semantic level, ‘bez sensu’ removes the value of the trivialised semantic standard. In conversations, it is the reaction to scripts which contradict natural logic and the common-sensical cause-and-effect course of things. An important function is the bringing forward of scripts of failure, wastefulness, redundancy, and lack of benefit or expected or actual harm. At the interactive level, the ‘bez sensu’ expression fulfils the function of support for the argumentative power of a communication; it is also a measure of undermining an argumentation – it emphasises the frailty of its premises. In axiological strategies, ‘bez sensu’ is a major component of emotive acts and the building block of the emotional tension between interlocutors. In this instance, it is mostly used to bring forward the experience of a negative emotion. One negative outcome of using the ‘bez sensu’ expression is the introduction distance to interpersonal contact, and in some cases the sense of intellectually debasing the sender of a communication. The article includes several examples of media-based political statements with the ‘bez sensu’ expression, which are used for discrediting political opponents.
Downloads
References
Awdiejew Aleksy, “Czym jest sens?” [in:] Komunikowanie wartości – wartość komunikowania, eds. I. Benenowska, A. Bączkowska, W. Czechowski, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Kazimierza Wielkiego, Bydgoszcz 2019, pp. 65–74.
Google Scholar
Awdiejew Aleksy, Grażyna Habrajska, Komponowanie sensu w procesie odbioru komunikatów, Primum Verbum, Łódź 2010.
Google Scholar
Fleischer Michael, Sens, czyli – co to jest. Perspektywa konstruktywistyczna, Wydawnictwo Primum Verbum, Łódź 2019.
Google Scholar
Habrajska Grażyna, Komunikacyjna analiza i interpretacja tekstu, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2004.
Google Scholar
Halliday Michael A.K., Explorations in the Functions of Language, E. Arnold, London 1973.
Google Scholar
Malinowski Grzegorz, Logika ogólna, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warsaw 2010.
Google Scholar
Maslov Abraham H., Motivation and Personality, Harper, New York 1954.
Google Scholar
Ogden Charles, Richards Ivor, The Meaning of Meaning. A Study of the Influence of Language upon Thought and of the Science of Symbolism, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London 1923.
Google Scholar
Perelman Chaim, Imperium retoryki, Retoryka i argumentacja, trans. M. Chomicz, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warsaw 2002.
Google Scholar
Sperber Dan, Wilson Deirdre, Relevance. Communication and Cognition, Blackwell, Oxford 1995.
Google Scholar
Stanosz Barbara, Wprowadzenie do logiki formalnej. Podręcznik dla humanistów, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warsaw 2012.
Google Scholar
Szymanek Krzysztof, Sztuka argumentacji. Słownik terminologiczny, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warsaw 2001.
Google Scholar
Tokarz Marek, Argumentacja, perswazja, manipulacja, Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne, Gdańsk 2006.
Google Scholar
Ziomek Jerzy, Retoryka opisowa, Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich, Wrocław–Warsaw–Krakow 2000.
Google Scholar
Ziółkowski Marek, Znaczenie – interakcja – rozumienie, Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warsaw 1981.
Google Scholar
https://twitter.com/leszekmiller/status/1063159714694029312 [accessed on: 15.03.2018].
Google Scholar
https://twitter.com/panwaldemar/status/829790926507823109 [accessed on: 15.03.2019].
Google Scholar
https://wpolityce.pl/polityka/418370-korwin-mikke-atakuje-kukiz15-tego-typu-ruch-jest-bez-sensu [accessed on: 15.03.2019].
Google Scholar
https://wpolityce.pl/polityka/438418-prof-legutko-oburzajaca-wypowiedz-bronia-rza-to-szantaz [accessed on: 15.03.2019].
Google Scholar
https://www.facebook.com/jakub.zulczyk/posts/po-internecie-kr%C4%85%C5%BCy--wypowied%C5%BA-krystyny-paw%C5%82owicz-nt-samob%C3%B3jstwa-kac-pra-z-gorczyn/1468669583222633/ [accessed on: 15.03.2019].
Google Scholar
https://www.fakt.pl/wydarzenia/polityka/schetyna-zje-kosiniaka/ghnf80n?utm_source=_viasg_fakt&utm_medium=direct&utm_campaign=leo_automatic&srcc=ucs&utm_v=2 [accessed on: 15.03.2019].
Google Scholar
https://www.gosc.pl/doc/4643655.Kaczynski-Jestem-dosc-optymistyczny-ws-wyco-fania-procedury-z [accessed on: 15.03.2019].
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b52d/0b52d46edc111e449a0fbf055f579b35f69999ca" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.