The Temporal Stability of Buyers’ Preferences for Property Localization on the Housing Market in Szczecin

Barbara Batóg; Iwona Foryś

doi:10.18778/0208-6018.342.06

Authors

Barbara Batóg University of Szczecin, Faculty of Economics and Management, Institute of Econometrics and Statistics http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9236-7405
Iwona Foryś University of Szczecin, Faculty of Economics and Management, Institute of Econometrics and Statistics https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2294-0672

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.342.06

Keywords:

housing market, temporal stability, fixed effects model

Abstract

The housing market investors’ decisions are caused by their subjective expectations. These decisions are to do with financial resources, activity of local developers and buyers’ individual needs connected to the size of their household or their specific habits, as well as a sense of security and prestige of the neighborhood. The localization of a property is one of the most significant determinants of its price because of its spatial constancy. The attributes of a given residential area influence the value of properties and this phenomenon can be observed through intensity of transactions and transaction prices. On the other hand, the neighborhood’s influence changes over time. These changes are sometimes slow but could be very substantial. That is why buyers’ preferences can also change over time. The aim of this research is the analysis of the temporal stability of buyers’ localization preferences on the housing market in Szczecin. The fixed effects model, which allows for the comparison of changes in apartments’ prices in residential areas, has been applied. The data came from notarial deeds, from registers of real estate prices and values concerning transactions on the housing market in Szczecin.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anas A., Arnott R., Small K. A. (1998), Urban Spatial Structure, “Journal of Economic Literature”, vol. 36, pp. 1426–1464.
Google Scholar

Anselin L. (1998), Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models, Springer Science+Business Media, Dordrecht.
Google Scholar

Cameron A. C., Trivedi P. K. (2005), Microeconometrics. Methods and Applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Google Scholar

Dańska‑Borsiak B. (2011), Dynamiczne modele panelowe w badaniach ekonomicznych, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź
Google Scholar

DiPasquale D., Wheaton W. C. (1996), Urban Economics and Real Estate Markets, Prentice‑Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs.
Google Scholar

Draper N. R., Smith H. (1998), Applied Regression Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Google Scholar

Foryś I. (2011), Społeczno‑gospodarcze determinanty rozwoju rynku mieszkaniowego w Polsce. Ujęcie ilościowe, “Rozprawy i Studia”, vol. 793, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, Szczecin.
Google Scholar

Foryś I., Batóg B. (2013), The Analysis of Spatial Stability of Prices on the Secondary Housing Market, “Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica”, no. 292, pp. 77–88.
Google Scholar

Freideman A. (2000), Preferences of First – time Buyers of Affordable Housing Evidence from Grow Homes in Montreal, Canada, “Canadian Journal of Urban Research”, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–22.
Google Scholar

Johnston J. (1991), Econometric Methods, McGraw‑Hill Book Company, New York.
Google Scholar

Judge G. G., Griffiths W. E., Hill R. C., Lutkepohl H., Lee T.‑C. (1985), The Theory and Practice of Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Google Scholar

Kucharska‑Stasiak E. (2016), Ekonomiczny wymiar nieruchomości, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Maddala G. S. (2006), Ekonometria, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Matyas L., Sevestre P. (2008), The Econometrics of Panel Data, Springer, Berlin–Heidelberg.
Google Scholar

Shiller R. (2006), Long‑Term Perspective on the Current Boom in Home Prices, “The Economists’ Voice”, vol. 3(4), pp. 1–11, http://dx.doi.org/10.2202/1553–3832.1145.
Google Scholar