Building Bridges: Understanding the Interplay between Generation X, Generation Y, and Generation Baby Boomers – Characteristics, Organisational Culture, and Organisational Identification in Modern Cities

Aygün Kam

doi:10.18778/0208-6018.365.04

Authors

Aygün Kam University of Lodz, Faculty of Economics and Sociology, Department of Local Government Economics, Lodz, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5187-6035

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.365.04

Keywords:

modern cities, urban workforce, organisational culture, organisational identification, generations

Abstract

Over the years, the profile of a modern city dweller has been evolving and diversifying due to the emergence of various generations. Different generations are characterised by distinct expectations and perspectives towards life. Therefore, in today’s highly dynamic environment, city authorities must deeply understand their city dwellers to build an influential organisational culture which will lead them to have city friendly citizens in order to create resilient, sustainable, and inclusive cities. This study aims to define the impact of Generation X, Generation Y, and Generation Baby Boomers employees’ characteristics on organisational culture and organisational identification relationships in terms of professional and urban life. From this perspective, a study was carried out on 460 white-collar employees who are city dwellers working stationary in the private sector in Istanbul. The data were obtained in the course of a quantitative study carried out through an interview questionnaire using the CAPI (Computer Assisted Personal Interview) technique. The primary conclusions are that there is a statistically significant and positive relationship between clan (β = 0.360, p < 0.01) as well as market (β = 0.147, p < 0.05) culture and organisational identification. In addition, there is a statistically significant relationship between employees’ experience levels and their perceptions of adhocracy culture (F = 3.19, p < 0.05), and there is no statistically significant difference between the perceptions of Generation X, Y, and Baby Boomers employees about organisational culture and organisational identification levels.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allam Z., Newman P. (2018), Redefining the smart city: Culture, metabolism and governance, “Smart Cities”, vol. 1(1), pp. 4–25.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities1010002

Anholt S. (2007), What is competitive identity?, [in:] S. Anholt, Competitive identity, Springer Nature, London, pp. 1–23.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230627727_1

Anholt S. (2011), Beyond the Nation Brand: The Role of Image and Identity in International Relations, [in:] A. Pike (ed.), Brands and branding geographies, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp. 6–12.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857930842.00027

Ashforth B.E., Mael F. (1989), Social Identity Theory and The Organization, “Academy of Management Review”, vol. 14(1), pp. 20–39.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4278999

Assoratgoon W., Kantabutra S. (2023), Toward a sustainability organizational culture model, “Journal of Cleaner Production”, 136666.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136666

Aydıntan B. (2005), Cultural Diversity and Its Effects in Multinational Business, [in:] O.A. Seymen, T. Bolat (eds.), Globalization and Multinational Business, Celal Bayar University, Manisa, pp. 153–178.
Google Scholar

Cameron K.S., Quinn R.E. (2006), Diagnosing and Changing Culture Organizational Based on the competing values framework, John Willey & Sons Inc., San Francisco.
Google Scholar

Cameron K.S., Freeman S.J., Mishra A.K. (1991), Best practices in white-collar downsizing: Managing contradictions, “Academy of Management Perspectives”, vol. 5(3), pp. 57–73.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1991.4274469

Caragliu A., Del Bo C., Nijkamp P. (2011), Smart cities in Europe, “Journal of Urban Technology”, vol. 18(2), pp. 65–82.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2011.601117

Castells M. (1989), The informational city: Technology, economic restructuring, and the urban-regional process, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Google Scholar

Denison D.R., Mishra A.K. (1995), Toward A Theory of Organizational Culture and Effectiveness, “Organization Science”, vol. 6(2), pp. 204–223.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.2.204

Deshpandé R., Farley J.U., Webster Jr. F.E. (1993), Corporate culture, customer orientation, and innovativeness in Japanese firms: a quadrad analysis, “Journal of Marketing”, vol. 57(1), pp. 23–37.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299305700102

Doğan B. (2007) Organization culture, Beta Publications, Istanbul.
Google Scholar

Ge J., Su X., Zhou Y. (2010), Organizational socialization, organizational identification and organizational citizenship behavior: An empirical research of Chinese high‐tech manufacturing enterprises, “Nankai Business Review International”, vol. 1(2), pp. 166–179.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/20408741011052573

Gürbüz S. (2015), Generational Differences: A Myth or Reality?, “İş ve İnsan Dergisi”, vol. 2(1), pp. 39–57.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18394/iid.80342

Hammill G. (2005), Mixing and Managing Four Generations of Employees, “FDU Magazine Online”, vol. 12(2).
Google Scholar

Hu Y., Huang J. (2023), Delineating and comparing local labor market geographies of Millennials, Generation Xers, and Baby Boomers, “Travel Behaviour and Society”, vol. 30, pp. 325–334.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2022.10.012

İŞKUR (n.d.), https://www.iskur.gov.tr/ [accessed: 7.05.2023].
Google Scholar

Kam A. (2019), Örgüt kültürü ve örgütsel özdeşleşme ilişkisinde X ve Y kuşağı işgören özelliklerinin etkisi, Master’s thesis, Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
Google Scholar

Kam A. (2021), The importance of different generational features for urban management and planning, SKN SPATIUM, Lodz.
Google Scholar

Kam A. (2023), Remote work in the public institutions: Theoretical considerations and exploration of its potential benefits, “Polityka Społeczna”, vol. 19(eng (1)), pp. 13–19.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.1437

Kam A., Trippner-Hrabi J. (2021), The influence of generation X and Y employees on modern cities, “Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica”, vol. 1(352), pp. 39–61.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.352.03

Knox H. (2010), Cities and organisation: The information city and urban form, “Culture and Organization”, vol. 16(3), pp. 185–195.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2010.503496

Korkmaz O., Aydemir S., Uysal H.T. (2017), The Impact of the Dominant Institutional Culture on Organizational Identification, “Journal of Balkan Social Sciences”, vol. 6(12), pp. 62–81.
Google Scholar

Köse C.G. (2009), Contribution of Organizational Identification to Continuous Improvement Efforts of Employees: A Study, Istanbul University Institute of Social Sciences, Istanbul.
Google Scholar

Kupperschmidt B.R. (2000), Multigeneration Employees: Strategies For Effective Management, “The Health Care Manager”, vol. 19(1), pp. 65–76.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00126450-200019010-00011

Mael F., Ashforth B.E. (1992), Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification, “Journal of Organizational Behavior”, vol. 13(2), pp. 103–123.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130202

Markina I., Drogomyretska M. (2014), The role of branding in the sustainable development of tourist destination, “Journal of Research on Trade, Management and Economic Development”, vol. 2, pp. 37–43.
Google Scholar

Mendoza Moheno J., Hernández Calzada M.A., Salazar Hernández B.C. (2017), Organizational Challenges for Building Smart Cities, [in:] M. Peris-Ortiz, D.R. Bennett, D. Pérez-Bustamente Yábar (eds.), Sustainable Smart Cities: Creating Spaces for Technological, Social and Business Development, Springer, Switzerland, pp. 89–99.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40895-8_7

Miller V .D., Allen M., Casey M.K., Johnson J.R. (2000), Reconsidering the organizational identification questionnaire, “Management Communication Quarterly”, vol. 13(4), pp. 626–658.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318900134003

Mücevher M.H. (2015), Feature and interaction perceptions of generation X and Y against each other: SDU sample, Doctoral dissertation, Süleyman Demirel University Institute of Social Sciences, Isparta.
Google Scholar

Oblinger D., Oblinger J. (eds.) (2005), Educating the Net Generation, Educause, Boulder.
Google Scholar

Özgözgü S. (2016), Kurumsal imaj, örgüt kültürü ve örgütsel özdeşleşme ilişkisi, “Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi”, vol. 25(2), pp. 581–596.
Google Scholar

Özkalp E., Kırel Ç. (2013), Örgütsel Davranış, Ekin Yayınevi, Bursa.
Google Scholar

Pieroni A., Scarpato N., Di Nunzio L., Fallucchi F., Raso M. (2018), Smarter city: smart energy grid based on blockchain technology, “International Journal on Advanced Science Engineering and Information Technology”, vol. 8(1), pp. 298–306.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.8.1.4954

Quinn R.E. (1988), Beyond rational management: mastering the paradoxes and competing demands of high performance, Jossey Bass, San Francisco.
Google Scholar

Schein E.H. (1984), Coming to A New Awareness of Organizational Culture, “Sloan Management Review”, vol. 25(2), pp. 3–16.
Google Scholar

Schein E.H. (2010), Organizational Culture and Leadership, vol. 2, John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey.
Google Scholar

Schwarz T. (2008), Brace Yourself Here Comes Generation Y, “Critical Care Nurse”, vol. 28(5), pp. 80–85.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2008.28.5.80

Scott‐Findlay S., Estabrooks C.A. (2006), Mapping the organizational culture research in nursing: a literature review, “Journal of Advanced Nursing”, vol. 56(5), pp. 498–513.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04044.x

Sekaran U. (2003), Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Google Scholar

Sekaran U., Bougie R. (2016), Research methods for business: A skill building approach, John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex.
Google Scholar

Seymen O.A. (2008), A Research on Organizational Culture Types Affecting Organizational Commitment, Detay Publishing, Ankara.
Google Scholar

Sathe V . (1983), Implications of corporate culture: A manager’s guide to action, “Organizational Dynamics”, vol. 12(2), pp. 5–23.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(83)90030-X

Şişman M. (2007), Örgütler ve kültürler: Örgüt kültürü, Pegem A Publising, Ankara.
Google Scholar

Sun R., Li J.Y.Q., Lee Y., Tao W. (2023), The role of symmetrical internal communication in improving employee experiences and organizational identification during COVID–19 pandemic-induced organizational change, “International Journal of Business Communication”, vol. 60(4), pp. 1398–1426.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23294884211050628

Tajfel H., Turner J.C. (1979), An integrative theory of intergroup conflict, [in:] W.G. Austin, S. Worchel (eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations, Brooks/Cole, Monterey, pp. 33–37.
Google Scholar

Tokgöz E. Seymen O.A. ve (2013), Örgütsel Güven, Örgütsel Özdeşleşme ve Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı Arasındaki İlişki: Bir Devlet Hastanesinde Araştırma, “Öneri Dergisi”, vol. 10(39), pp. 61–76.
Google Scholar

Trippner-Hrabi J., Chądzyński J., Kam A. (2023), Benefits of Remote Work in the Self-Service Model in the Public Utility Sector, [in:] G. Rouet, T. Côme (eds.), Participatory and Digital Democracy at the Local Level: European Discourses and Practices, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 327–346.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20943-7_20

Williams S. (2010), Welcome to Generation Z, “B and T Magazine”, vol. 60(2731), pp. 12–12.
Google Scholar

Yesil S., Kaya A. (2013), The effect of organizational culture on firm financial performance: Evidence from a developing country, “Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences”, no. 81, pp. 428–437.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.455