Spatial Autocorrelation in the Analysis of the Land Property Market on the Example of Szczecin and Bydgoszcz

Barbara Batóg; Iwona Foryś; Radosław Gaca

doi:10.18778/0208-6018.329.03

Authors

Barbara Batóg University of Szczecin, Faculty of Economics and Management, Institute of Econometrics and Statistics, Department of Operations Research and Applied Mathematics in Economics
Iwona Foryś
Radosław Gaca

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.329.03

Keywords:

land property market, spatial autocorrelation

Abstract

The location of the real estate is the most important determinant of its value. Location does not change, therefore the value of real estate strongly depends on factors specific to a given area within a city. Topography influencing a possibility of land development, territorial development, installations and road infrastructure as well as the neighbourhood have great influence over the price of the real estate. All these factors are connected with buyers’ preferences and with transactional price, unit price and value of the property. The aim of the paper is to analyse the influence of the relative position of the examined real estates on their prices; and comparison of results obtained for Szczecin and Bydgoszcz. In order to achieve this aim Moran’s I Statistic and spatial autoregressive model were applied. The data came from notarial deeds from registers of real estate prices and values concerning transactions on land ownerships on unbuilt land properties in 2014 in Szczecin and Bydgoszcz.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anselin L. (1998), Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models, Springer, Dordrecht.
Google Scholar

Arbia G., Baltagi B.H. (2009), Spatial Econometrics. Methods and Applications, Physica‑Verlag, Heidelberg.
Google Scholar

Batóg B., Foryś I . (2014), Spatial Analysis of Housing Market Transactions in Szczecin, “Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica”, no. 6(309), pp. 31–42.
Google Scholar

Batóg B., Foryś I. (2016), Porównanie struktury mieszkań w obrocie w wybranych miastach Polski północno‑zachodniej, “Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie. Cracow Review of Economics and Management”, no. 9(957), Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie, Kraków, pp. 55–70.
Google Scholar

Been V., Voicu I. (2008), The Effect of Community Gardens on Neighbouring Property Values, “Real Estate Economics”, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 241–283.
Google Scholar

Domański C. (1990), Testy statystyczne, PWE, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Ellen I .G., Schill M.H., Schwartz A.E, Voicu I . (2007), Does Federally Subsidized Rental Housing Depress Neighborhood Property Values?, “Journal of Policy Analysis and Management”, no. 26, pp. 257–280.
Google Scholar

Foryś I . (ed.) (2014), Zarządzanie nieruchomościami handlowymi, Wydawnictwo Poltext, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Foryś I., Nowak M. (2014), Zarządzanie przestrzenią w gospodarowaniu nieruchomościami, Wydawnictwo Poltext, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Fujita M., Krugman P., Venables A. (1999), The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade, The MIT Press, Cambridge.
Google Scholar

Lee J., Wong D.W.S. (2001), Statistical Analysis with Arcview GIS, John Wiley & Sons Inc., USA.
Google Scholar

Suchecki B. (ed.) (2010), Ekonometria przestrzenna. Metody i modele analizy danych przestrzennych, Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Wang L. (2006), Spatial Econometric Issues in Hedonic Property Value Models: Model Choice and Endogenous Land Use, Pennsylvania State University, ProQuest, Pennsylvania.
Google Scholar

Wurtzebach C., Miles M. (1987), Modern Real Estate, John Wiley & Sons Inc., USA.
Google Scholar