AOIΔIMOI AΘANAI. The Praise of Athens in Pindar’s Poetry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-0319.23.02Keywords:
Pindar, polis-encomium, Athens, epinicians, dithyrambsAbstract
The prescriptions on how to eulogize the city, provided in 3rd century by Menander Rhetor in his treatise On Epideictic, reflect the encomiastic convention according to which Pindar composed his poetic encomia urbis. Among the topoi that the poet applies to praise Athens one can list the ancient origin of the city, including the identification of its founder, the practiced habits concerning the form of politeia as well as those concerning the professional skills and abilities of the inhabitants, their virtues and deeds in war and in peace.
In Pindar’s victory odes, the praise of the city is always subordinated to the praise of an individual victor. Therefore, the poet praises the outstanding individuals, members of aristocratic families, whose values and achievements adorn their city, and who inherited their excellence from heroic ancestors, mythical founders of Athens. In dithyrambic poems, composed for Athenian festivals and performed by kyklioi choroi of men and boys representing the communities of phylai, polis-encomium is a form of self-praise, an expression of 5th century Athenian ideology, which makes citizens proud of their city’s power. Consequently, Pindar focuses on praising Athens’ military prowess and the dominant position which the city achieved in the Greek world, its institutions, its beauty and public buildings.
References
Arystofanes (2001). Komedie. T. I: Acharnejczycy, Rycerze, Chmury, Osy, Pokój. Przeł. J. Ławińska-Tyszkowska. Warszawa: Prószyński i S-ka.
Athanassaki, L. (2011). Song, Politics, and Cultural Memory: Pindar’s Pythian 7 and the Alcmaeonid Temple of Apollo. W: Athanassaki, L., Bowie, E. (red.). Archaic and Classical Choral Song: Performance, Politics and Dissemination. Berlin–Boston: De Gruyter. 235–268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110254020.235
Bowra, C.M. (1964). Pindar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bundy, E.L. (1962). Studia Pindarica. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Burton, R.W.B. (1962). Pindar’s Pythian Odes. Essays in Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Calame, C. (2013). The Dithyramb, a Dionysiac Poetic Form: Genre Rules and Cultic Context. W: Kowalzig, B., Wilson P. (red.). Dithyramb in Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 332–352.
Cook, A.B. (1900). “Iostephanos. Why was Athens called the City of the Violet Crown”, Journal of Hellenic Studies 20. 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/623737
Danielewicz, J. (1996). Liryka starożytnej Grecji. Warszawa–Poznań: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
Eckerman, Ch. (2014). Pindar’s Delphi. W: Gilhuly, K., Worman, N. (red.). Space, Place and Landscape in Ancient Greek Literature and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 21–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107323766.002
Farnell, L.R. (1932). The Works of Pindar. Vol. II: Critical Commentary to the Works of Pindar. London: Macmillan.
Fearn, D.W. (2013). Athens and the Empire. The Contextual Flexibility of Dithyramb, and its Imperialist Ramification. W: Kowalzig, B., Wilson, P. (red.). Dithyramb in Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 133–152.
Figueira, T.J. (1993). Excursions in Epichoric History: Aeginetan Essays. Lanham: Rowman&Littlefield.
Goldhill, S. (1991). The Poet’s Voice. Essays on Poetics and Greek Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627347
Hamilton, R. (1974). Epinikion. General Form in the Odes of Pindar. The Hague–Paris: Mouton. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110869460
Herodot (1954). Dzieje. Przeł. S. Hammer. Warszawa: Spółdzielnia Wydawnicza „Czytelnik”.
Ieranò, G. (2013). “One who is Fought over by all the Tribes”: The Dithyrambic Poet and the City of Athens. W: Kowalzig, B., Wilson, P. (red.). Dithyramb in Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 368–386.
Kirkwood, G. (1982). Selections from Pindar. Chico: Scholars Press.
Komornicka, A. (1979). Studia nad Pindarem i archaiczną liryką grecką. W kręgu pojęć prawdy i fałszu. Łódź: Uniwersytet Łódzki.
Lausberg, H. (2002). Retoryka literacka. Podstawy wiedzy o literaturze. Przeł. A. Gorzkowski. Bydgoszcz: Homini.
Liddell, H.G. et al. (red.). (1996). A Greek-English Lexicon. Revised and augmented by Sir H.S. Jones, with the assistance of R. McKenzie. With a revised supplement. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Morris, S.P. (1992). Daidalos and the Origins of Greek Art. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691241944
Neer, R.T., Kurke, L. (2014). “Pindar Fr. 75 SM and the Politics of Athenian Space”. Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 54. 527–579.
Pauzaniasz (1973). Wędrówka po Helladzie. W świątyni i w micie. Z Pauzaniasza Wędrówki po Helladzie księgi I, II, III i VII. Przeł. J. Niemirska-Pliszczyńska. Wrocław–Warszawa–Kraków–Gdańsk: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich.
Pfeijffer, I.L. (1999). Three Aeginetan Odes of Pindar. A Commentary on Nemean V, Nemean II,I & Pythian VII. Leiden–Boston–Köln: Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004351240
Pindar (1987). Ody zwycięskie: Olimpijskie, Pytyjskie, Nemejskie, Istmijskie. Przeł. M. Brożek. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie.
Pindar (2005). Wybór poezji. Oprac. A. Szastyńska-Siemion. Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich.
Podlecki, A.J. (1984). The Early Greek Poets and their Times. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
Race, W.H. (1987). “Pindaric Encomium and Isokrates’ Evagoras”. Transactions of American Philological Association 117. 131–155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/283964
Rodighiero, A. (2012). The Sense of Place: Oedipus at Colonus, “Political” Geography, and the Defence of a Way of Life. W: Markantonatos, A., Zimmermann, B. (red.). Crisis on Stage: Tragedy and Comedy in Late Fifth-Century Athens. Berlin–Boston: Walter de Gruyter. 55–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110271560.55
Schadewaldt, W. (1928). Der Aufbau des Pindarischen Epinikion. Halle: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
Snell, B., Maehler, H. (eds.) (1987–1989). Pindari carmina cum fragmentis. Pars I: Epinicia. Pars II: Fragmenta. Indices. Leipzig: Teubner.
Stoneman, R. (2014). Pindar. London–New York: Bloomsbury Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9780755693795
Szastyńska-Siemion, A. (1975). Epinikion greckie. Monografia gatunku. Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich.
Tukidydes (2003). Wojna peloponeska. Przeł. K. Kumaniecki. Warszawa: Czytelnik.
Verdenius, W.J. (1988). Commentaries on Pindar. Vol. II: Olympian Odes 1, 10, 11, Nemean 11, Isthmian 2. Leiden–New York–København–Köln: Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004328884
Węcowski, M. (2009). Demokracja ateńska w epoce klasycznej. W: Bravo, B. et al. (red.). Historia starożytnych Greków. T. II: Okres klasyczny. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego. 345–520.
Wilson, P. (2000). The Athenian Institution of the Khoregia. The Chorus, The City and the Stage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4352616
Zimmermann, B. (1992). Dithyrambos. Geschichte einer Gattung. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck &Ruprecht. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666251979
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
