Emisja CO2 w krajach Grupy Wyszehradzkiej a polityka klimatyczna Unii Europejskiej
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.23.05Słowa kluczowe:
emisja dwutlenku węgla, analiza dekompozycyjna LMDI, polityka klimatyczna Unii Europejskiej, kraje Grupy WyszehradzkiejAbstrakt
Zmiana klimatu jest jednym z najbardziej palących wyzwań naszych czasów. W związku z tym podejmowany jest szereg działań mających na celu złagodzenie tego negatywnego zjawiska. Redukcja emisji gazów cieplarnianych, poprawa efektywności energetycznej oraz wzrost udziału energii ze źródeł odnawialnych stanowią także priorytet polityki Unii Europejskiej. W tym kontekście celem artykułu jest zbadanie czynników wpływających na zmiany emisji CO2 w czterech państwach członkowskich UE tworzących Grupę Wyszehradzką, w latach 1993–2016. Analiza przeprowadzona z wykorzystaniem metody dekompozycji LMDI (Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index) oraz tożsamości Kaya pozwala zidentyfikować czynniki, które w największym stopniu przyczyniają się do zmian emisji CO2. Umożliwia ona także omówienie uzyskanych wyników w powiązaniu z polityką klimatyczną Unii Europejskiej. Zgodnie z wynikami analizy dekompozycyjnej energochłonność oraz wzrost gospodarczy wyrażony PKB per capita były głównymi czynnikami przyczyniającymi się do zmian emisji CO2 we wszystkich rozważanych krajach. Spadek emisji wynikał głównie z poprawy efektywności energetycznej i w mniejszym stopniu ze zmian koszyka energetycznego w stronę odnawialnych źródeł energii.
Pobrania
Bibliografia
Ang, B.W. (2004), Decomposition analysis for policy making in energy: which is the preferred method?, “Energy Policy”, Vol. 32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00076-4
Google Scholar
Ang, B.W. (2005), The LMDI approach to decomposition analysis: a practical guide, “Energy Policy”, Vol. 33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2003.10.010
Google Scholar
Ang, B.W. (2015), LMDI decomposition approach: A guide for implementation, “Energy Policy”, Vol. 86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.07.007
Google Scholar
Ang, B.W., Goh, T. (2019), Index decomposition analysis for comparing emission scenarios: Applications and challenges, “Energy Economics”, Vol. 83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.06.013
Google Scholar
Ang, B.W., Zhang, F.Q., Choi, K.H. (1998), Factorizing changes in energy and environmental indicators through decomposition, “Energy”, Vol. 23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S03605442(98)00016-4
Google Scholar
Calbick, K.S., Gunton, T. (2014), Differences among OECD countries’ GHG emissions: Causes and policy implications, “Energy Policy”, Vol. 67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.12.030
Google Scholar
Cansino, J.M, Sánchez-Braza, A., Rodríguez-Arévalo, M.L. (2015), Driving forces of Spain’s CO2 emissions: A LMDI decomposition approach, “Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews”, Vol. 48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.011
Google Scholar
Chapman, A., Fujii, H., Managi, S. (2018), Key drivers for cooperation toward sustainable development and the management of CO2 emissions: Comparative analysis of six Northeast Asian countries, “Sustainability”, Vol. 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010244
Google Scholar
Chen, J., Wang, P., Cui, L., Huang, S., Song, M. (2018), Decomposition and decoupling analysis of CO2 emissions in OECD, “Applied Energy”, Vol. 231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.179
Google Scholar
Conclusions on 2030 Climate and Energy Policy Framework (2014), European Council, https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/145356.pdf (accessed: 10.04.2019).
Google Scholar
Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (2018), “Official Journal of the European Union”, L. 328, Vol. 61.
Google Scholar
Directive (EU) 2018/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 amending Directive 2012/27/EU on energy efficiency (2018), “Official Journal of the European Union”, L. 328, Vol. 61.
Google Scholar
Engo, J. (2018), Decomposing the decoupling of CO2 emissions from economic growth in Cameroon, “Environmental Science and Pollution Research”, Vol. 25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3511-z
Google Scholar
Europe 2020: A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth (2010), Communication from the European Commission, Brussels 3.3.2010, COM (2010) 2020 final, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:2020:FIN:EN:PDF (accessed: 21.05.2015).
Google Scholar
Fatima, T., Xia, E., Cao, Z., Khan, D., Fan, J-L. (2019), Decomposition analysis of energy-related CO2 emission in the industrial sector of China: Evidence from the LMDI approach, “Environmental Science and Pollution Research”, Vol. 26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05468-5
Google Scholar
Feng, C., Huang, J.-B., Wang, M. (2018), The driving forces and potential mitigation of energy-related CO2 emissions in China’s metal industry, “Resources Policy”, Vol. 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.09.003
Google Scholar
Freitas, L.C., Kaneko, S. (2011), Decomposition of CO2 emissions change from energy consumption in Brazil: Challenges and policy implications, “Energy Policy”, Vol. 39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.12.023
Google Scholar
González, P.F., Landajo, M., Presno, M.J. (2014a), The driving forces behind changes in CO2 emission levels in EU-27. Differences between member states, “Environmental Science & Policy”, Vol. 38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.10.007
Google Scholar
González, P.F., Landajo, M., Presno M.J. (2014b), Tracking European Union CO2 emissions through LDMI (logarithmic mean divisia index) decomposition. The activity revaluation approach, “Energy”, Vol. 73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.06.078
Google Scholar
Karmellos, M., Kopidou, D., Diakoulaki, D. (2016), A decomposition analysis of the driving factors of CO2 (Carbon dioxide) emissions from the power sector in the European Union countries, “Energy”, Vol. 94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.10.145
Google Scholar
Köne, A.Ç., Büke, T. (2019), Factor analysis of projected carbon dioxide emissions according to the IPCC based sustainable emission scenario in Turkey, “Renewable Energy”, Vol. 133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.10.099
Google Scholar
Kumbaroğlu, G. (2011), A sectoral decomposition analysis of Turkish CO2 emissions over 1990–2007, “Energy”, Vol. 36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.01.027
Google Scholar
Li, W., Ou, Q., Chen, Y. (2014), Decomposition of China’s CO2 emissions from agriculture utilizing an improved Kaya identity, “Environmental Science and Pollution Research”, Vol. 21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3250-8
Google Scholar
Lima, F., Nunes, M.L., Cunha, J., Lucena, A.F.P. (2016), A cross-country assessment of energy-related CO2 emissions: An extended Kaya Index Decomposition Approach, “Energy”, Vol. 115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.05.037
Google Scholar
Madaleno, M., Moutinho, V. (2017), A new LDMI decomposition approach to explain emission development in the EU: Individual and set contribution, “Environmental Science and Pollution Research”, Vol. 24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8547-y
Google Scholar
Mavromatidis, G., Orehounig, K., Richner, P., Carmeliet, J. (2016), A strategy for reducing CO2 emissions from buildings with the Kaya identity – A Swiss energy system analysis and a case study, “Energy Policy”, Vol. 88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.10.037
Google Scholar
Moutinho, V., Moreira, A.C., Silva, P.M. (2015), The driving forces of change in energy-related CO2 emissions in Eastern, Western, Northern and Southern Europe: The LMDI approach to decomposition analysis, “Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews”, Vol. 50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.072
Google Scholar
O’Mahony, T. (2013), Decomposition of Ireland’s carbon emissions from 1990 to 2010: An extended Kaya identity, “Energy Policy”, Vol. 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.04.013
Google Scholar
Pakulski, J. (ed.) (2016), The Visegrad countries in crisis, Collegium Civitas, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Pao, H.-T., Tsai, C.-M. (2011), Multivariate Granger causality between CO2 emissions, energy consumption, FDI (foreign direct investment) and GDP (gross domestic product): Evidence from a panel of BRIC (Brazil, Russian Federation, India, and China) countries, “Energy”, Vol. 36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.09.041
Google Scholar
Remuzgo, L., Sarabia, J.M. (2015), International inequality in CO2 emissions: A new factorial decomposition based on Kaya factors, “Environmental Science & Policy”, Vol. 54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.05.020
Google Scholar
Shahiduzzaman, Md., Layton, A. (2015), Changes in CO2 emissions over business cycle recessions and expansions in the United States: A decomposition analysis, “Applied Energy”, Vol. 150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.007
Google Scholar
Štreimikienė, D., Balezentis, T. (2016), Kaya identity for analysis of the main drivers of GHG emissions and feasibility to implement EU “20–20–20” targets in the Baltic States, “Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews”, Vol. 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.311
Google Scholar
Tang, C.F., Tan, B.W. (2015), The impact of energy consumption, income and foreign direct investment on carbon dioxide emissions in Vietnam, “Energy”, Vol. 79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.11.033
Google Scholar
Vehmas, J., Kaivo-oja, J., Luukkanen, J. (2018), Energy efficiency as a driver of total primary energy supply in the EU-28 countries – incremental decomposition analysis, “Heliyon”, Vol. 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00878
Google Scholar
Wang, H., Ang, B.W., Su, B. (2017), Multi-region structural decomposition analysis of global CO2 emission intensity, “Ecological Economics”, Vol. 142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.023
Google Scholar
Wang, Q., Li, R. (2016), Drivers for energy consumption: A comparative analysis of China and India, “Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews”, Vol. 62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.04.048
Google Scholar
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.