UMOWA HANDLOWA UNIA EUROPEJSKA‑REPUBLIKA KOREI I JEJ WPŁYW NA GOSPODARKI KRAJÓW V4. ANALIZA PORÓWNAWCZA ZAAWANSOWANIA TECHNOLOGICZNEGO ORAZ HANDLU WEWNĄTRZGAŁĘZIOWEGO
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/cer-2018-0001Słowa kluczowe:
gospodarki krajów V4, Republika Korei, umowa o wolnym handlu, zaawansowanie technologiczne, handel wewnątrzgałęziowyAbstrakt
Artykuł poświęcony jest zbadaniu krótko‑ i średniookresowych efektów w handlu towarowym między krajami Grupy Wyszehradzkiej (V4: Republika Czeska, Węgry, Polska, Słowacja) a Republiką Korei (Koreą Południową) w ramach umowy o wolnym handlu między Unią Europejską a Republiką Korei. W strategii „Trade for All” to porozumienie określono mianem najambitniejszej umowy handlowej kiedykolwiek zawartej i wdrożonej przez UE. Głównym celem analizy jest zidentyfikowanie, porównanie oraz ocena zachodzących zmian w zaawansowaniu technologicznym dwustronnych strumieni eksportu i importu oraz w obrębie struktury handlu wewnątrzgałęziowego. Szerszym kontekstem badań jest ponadto napływ koreańskich inwestycji zagranicznych do krajów V4. Analiza technologicznego zaawansowania oparta jest na podejściu metodologicznym Konferencji Narodów Zjednoczonych ds. Handlu i Rozwoju, podczas gdy intensywność wymiany wewnątrzgałęziowej jest mierzona indeksem Grubela‑Lloyda wraz z określeniem jej kategorii składowych (handlu poziomego i pionowego). Badaniem objęto okres 2001–2015. Nowatorskość opracowania wynika z faktu, że jak dotąd badania nad stosunkami handlowymi między Koreą Południową a krajami V4 nie zostały przeprowadzone w ten sposób. Wnioski sugerują wpływ południowokoreańskich inwestycji bezpośrednich na handel, co znajduje swoje odzwierciedlenie w deficycie handlowym oraz strukturze dwustronnej wymiany w ujęciu jej zaawansowania technologicznego. Inwestycje te mogły mieć także pozytywne skutki dla ewolucji wymiany wewnątrzgałęziowej, zwłaszcza w obrębie przemysłu maszynowego. Polityczna interpretacja wskazuje, że mogą one wzmacniać zagrożenia typowe dla pułapki średniego dochodu, zwłaszcza lukę technologiczną oraz nacisk na niskie koszty produkcji.
Pobrania
Bibliografia
Babones S.J. (2012), Position and mobility in the contemporary world-economy: A structuralist perspective, [in:] Babones S.J., Chase-Dunn Ch. (eds.), Routledge Handbook of World-System Analysis, Routledge, Oxford.
Google Scholar
Babones S.J. (2015), What is world-systems analysis? Distinguishing theory from perspective, ‘Thesis Eleven’, No. 127 (1).
Google Scholar
Baldwin R. (1993), A Domino Theory of Regionalism, NBER Working Paper No. 4465, Cambridge.
Google Scholar
Baldwin R. (2006), Multilateralising Regionalism: Spaghetti Bowls as Building Blocs on the Path to Global Free Trade, ‘World Economy’, No. 29 (11). doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9701.2006.00852.x
Google Scholar
Bhagwati J. (1995), US Trade Policy: The Infatuation with FTAs, Discussion Paper Series No. 726, Columbia University.
Google Scholar
Brown C.M. (2011), The European Union and Regional Trade Agreements: A Case Study of the EU-Korea FTA, [in:] Herrmann C., Terhechte J.P. (eds.) European Yearbook of International Economic Law 2011, European Yearbook of International Economic Law 2, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg.
Google Scholar
Cherry J. (2012), Upgrading the ‘software’: The EU–Korea Free Trade Agreement and sociocultural barriers to trade and investment, ‘The Pacific Review’, No. 25 (2). doi: 10.1080/09512748.2012.658849 ThomsonISI: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000303570300004&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3
Google Scholar
Cho C.-S. (2013), Korea – EU FTA: a blueprint for co-prosperity, [in:] Marx, A. et al. (eds.), EU-Korea Relations in a Changing World, A Joint Project by Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies (KU Leuven), Graduate School of International Studies (Seoul National University).
Google Scholar
Cohn T.H. (2016), Global Political Economy. Theory and Practice, 6th ed., New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Das D.K. (2012), The EU-Korea Free Trade Agreement: Making of a “Deep” Free Trade Agreement, ‘Global Economy Journal’, No. 12 (1).
Google Scholar
Dorożyński T., Kuna-Marszałek A. (2016), Investment Attractiveness. The Case of the Visegrad Group Countries, ‘Comparative Economic Research’, No. 19 (1).
Google Scholar
Dudáš T. (2015), Korean investments in V4 countries: Past, present and trends for the future, [in:] Grešš, M., Grančay, M. (eds.), Mutual Relations between the Republic of Korea and V4 Countries in Trade and Investment, Vydavateľstvo EKONÓM, Bratislava.
Google Scholar
Éltető A., Szunomár Á. (2015), Ties of the Visegrad Countries with East Asia. Trade and Investment, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies HAS Institute of World Economics, Working Paper No. 214, August.
Google Scholar
Endrődi-Kovács V., Kutasi G., Stukovszky T. (2015), Korean investments in V4 car, electronic and banking sector, [in:] Grešš, M., Grančay, M. (eds.), Mutual Relations between the Republic of Korea and V4 Countries in Trade and Investment, Vydavateľstvo EKONÓM, Bratislava.
Google Scholar
EUKORFTA (2010), Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Korea, of the other part, Official Journal L 127, 14/05/2011, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1399390040762&uri=CELEX:22011A0514(01), accessed on: 15.11.2016.
Google Scholar
European Commission (2011), The EU-Korea Free Trade Agreement in practice, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
Google Scholar
Global Europe: Competing in the world (2006), Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions of 4 October 2006, COM(2006) 567 final.
Google Scholar
Grančay M. (2015), Korean trade with the Visegrad countries: past, present and trends for the future, [in:] Grešš M., Grančay M. (eds.), Mutual Relations between the Republic of Korea and V4 Countries in Trade and Investment, Vydavateľstvo EKONÓM, Bratislava.
Google Scholar
Greenaway D., Hine R., Milner C. (1994), Country Specific Factors and the Pattern of Horizontal and Vertical Intra-Industry Trade in the UK, ‘Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv’, No. 130 (1).
Google Scholar
Greenaway D., Hine R., Milner C. (1995), Vertical and Horizontal Intra-Industry Trade: A Cross-Industry Analysis for the United Kingdom, ‘The Economic Journal’, No. 105 (433).
Google Scholar
Grubel H.G, Lloyd P.J. (1975), Intra-Industry Trade. The Theory and Measurement of International Trade in Differentiated Products, Macmillan, London.
Google Scholar
Heydon K., Woolcock S. (2009), The Rise of Bilateralism: Comparing American, European and Asian Approaches to Preferential Trade Agreements, United Nations University Press, Tokyo, New York, Paris.
Google Scholar
Horng D.-C. (2012), Reshaping the EU’s FTA Policy in a Globalizing Economy: The Case of the EU-Korea FTA, ‘Journal of World Trade’, No. 46 (2).
Google Scholar
Hwang K.-S, Lee J.-W., Kawai N. (2008), Japanese and Korean Foreign Direct Investment in Central and Eastern Europe: The Strategies and Economic Activities, ‘Journal of Korea Trade’ Vol. 12.
Google Scholar
Kaliszuk E. (2016), Chinese and South Korean investment in Poland: a comparative study, ‘Transnational Corporations Review’, No. 8 (1).
Google Scholar
Kelly R. (2012), Korea–European Union relations: beyond the FTA?, ‘International Relations of the Asia-Pacific’, No. 12.
Google Scholar
Kim C.-O. (2011), New Developments in EU’s External Trade Policy and Implications for Asia-Europe Relations, ‘Journal of East Asian Economic Integration’, No. 15 (4).
Google Scholar
Kim H. (2013), Korea and the European Union: a changing landscape, [in:] Youngs, R. (ed.), A New Context for EU-Korean Relations, FRIDE and the Korea Foundation.
Google Scholar
Lakatos C., Nilsson L. (2017), The EU-Korea FTA: anticipation, trade policy uncertainty and impact, ‘Review of World Economics’, No. 153 (1). ThomsonISI: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000393033500007&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3
Google Scholar
Magasházi A., Szijártó N., Tétényi A. (2015), Integrated in global value chains by Korean-V4 participation, [in:] Grešš, M., Grančay, M. (eds.), Mutual Relations between the Republic of Korea and V4 Countries in Trade and Investment, Vydavateľstvo EKONÓM, Bratislava.
Google Scholar
Mazur G. (2012), The European Union-South Korea Free Trade Agreement. A New Model of Trade and Economic Cooperation between Developed Countries, [in:] Skulski P. (ed.), Innovation as a Factor of the Development of the Asia-Pacific Region, Research Papers of Wrocław University of Economics, No. 257.
Google Scholar
Michalski B. (2016), The Comparative Analysis of Mid-Tech and High-Tech Trade of the Visegrad Countries and the German Impact, ‘Unia Europejska.pl’, No. 4 (239).
Google Scholar
Nam S.-H. (2015), Attractiveness of the Visegrád region for trade and investment development: the Korean perspective, [in:] Grešš M., Grančay M. (eds.), Mutual Relations between the Republic of Korea and V4 Countries in Trade and Investment, Vydavateľstvo EKONÓM, Bratislava.
Google Scholar
Park S.-H., Yoon S.-W. (2010), EU perceptions through the FTA lens: main results of interviews among the Korean “elites”, ‘Asia Europe Journal’, No. 8 (2). doi: 10.1007/s10308-010-0260-0 ThomsonISI: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000282694500006&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3
Google Scholar
Sankot O., Hnát P. (2015), Comparative advantage of V4 countries: Trends and changes between 2003 and 2013, [in:] Grešš M., Grančay M. (eds.), Mutual Relations between the Republic of Korea and V4 Countries in Trade and Investment, Vydavateľstvo EKONÓM, Bratislava.
Google Scholar
Smith R., El-Anis I., Farrands C. (2013), International Political Economy in the 21st Century. Contemporary Issues and Analyses, Routledge, New York.
Google Scholar
Szunomár Á., McCaleb A. (2016), Comparing Chinese, Japanese and South Korean FDI in Central and Eastern Europe: macroeconomic versus institutional factors, [in:] Wardęga J. (ed.), China-Central and Eastern Europe cross-cultural dialogue: society, business, education in transition, Jagiellonian University Press, Cracow.
Google Scholar
Trade for All. Towards a more responsible trade and investment policy (2015), Publications Office of the European Union Luxembourg.
Google Scholar
Trade Map (2017), http://www.trademap.org, accessed on: 14.03.2017.
Google Scholar
UNCTAD (2012), http://unctadstat.unctad.org/UnctadStatMetadata/Classifications/Methodology-&Classifications.html, accessed on: 26.10.2012.
Google Scholar
WTO (2011), World Trade Report 2011. The WTO and Preferential Trade Agreements: From Co-existence to Coherence, Geneva. ThomsonISI: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000302367600008&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3
Google Scholar
WTO (2012a), Consideration of the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Korea. Goods and Services, WT/REG296/M/1, 5 July.
Google Scholar
WTO (2012b), Factual Presentation, Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Korea (Goods and Services), Report by the Secretariat. Revision, WT/REG296/1/Rev.1, 31 August.
Google Scholar
WTO (2017), http://rtais.wto.org, accessed on: 30.03.2017.
Google Scholar
Zolin M.B., Andreosso-O’Callaghan B. (2013), The Korea-EU FTA: New Prospects for and Patterns of Agricultural and Agrifood Trade?, ‘Journal of Global Policy and Governance’, No. 1 (2).
Google Scholar
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b52d/0b52d46edc111e449a0fbf055f579b35f69999ca" alt="Creative Commons License"
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.