Why Have Labour Markets Reacted To The Global Crisis In Different Ways?

Eugeniusz Kwiatkowski

doi:10.1515/cer-2016-0027

Authors

Eugeniusz Kwiatkowski University of Lodz, Faculty of Economics and Sociology, Chair of Macroeconomics

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1515/cer-2016-0027

Keywords:

employment, unemployment, the global crisis, EU

Abstract

This paper aims to identify the effects of the global crisis on employment and unemployment in the EU countries and indicate factors which may explain the differentiated response of labour markets to this crisis.
Analyses show that the global economic crisis affected the labour markets of EU countries, causing declines in employment and increases in unemployment. The greatest declines in employment were observed in Greece, Estonia, Ireland, Spain, Iceland, and Portugal, and the lowest in Austria, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Poland. The greatest increase in unemployment occurred in the Baltic countries, Greece, Spain, and Portugal.
The analyses indicate that the scale of changes in employment and unemployment during the global crisis depends on such factors as: the depth of the demand shock and scale of GDP adjustments; the degree of openness of the economy; the scope of alternative labour market adjustments and some labour market institutions, especially employment protection legislation and the share of fixed-term employment contracts. The analyses indicate that the smallest declines in employment (and correspondingly the smallest increases in unemployment) during the crisis can be expected in countries where the EPL indexes and share of those employed on fixed-term employment contracts in total employment are moderate.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bednarski M. (2012), Zatrudnienie na czas określony. Perspektywa pracodawców, [in:] M. Bednarski, K.W. Frieske (ed.), Zatrudnienie na czas określony w polskiej gospodarce. Społeczne i ekonomiczne konsekwencje zjawiska, Instytut Pracy i Spraw Socjalnych, Warsaw.

Blanchard O., Summers L. (1986), Hysteresis and the European Unemployment Problem, NBER Macroeconomics Annual, No. 1, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Boeri T., van Ours J. (2011), Ekonomia niedoskonałych rynków pracy, Wolters Kluwer Polska Sp. z o.o., Warsaw.

Cahuc P., Zylberberg A. (2004), Labour Economics, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London.

Eurostat,: epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu

Greenwald B.C., Stiglitz J.E. (1995), Labour Market Adjustments and the Persistence of Unemployment, AEA Papers and Proceedings.

Kwiatkowski E., Włodarczyk P. (2012), Wpływ prawnej ochrony zatrudnienia na rynek pracy w warunkach negatywnego szoku ekonomicznego, ‘Gospodarka Narodowa’, Vol. LXXX/XXI, No. 11–12.

Kwiatkowski E., Włodarczyk P. (2015), Instytucje rynku pracy i polityka makroekonomiczna a zatrudnienie w krajach OECD w okresie globalnego kryzysu, [in:] E. Kwiatkowski, B. Liberda (ed.), Determinanty rozwoju Polski. Rynek pracy i demografia, PTE, Warsaw.

Lazear E.P. (1990), Job security provisions and unemployment, ‘Quarterly Journal of Economics’, No. 3.

OECD, strona internetowa OECD: http://www.oecd.org

Ostoj I. (2012), Formalne i nieformalne instytucje rynku pracy, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, Katowice.

Smith S. (2003), Labour Economics, Routledge, London–New York.

Strzelecki P., Wyszyński R., Saczuk K. (2009), Zjawisko chomikowania pracy w polskich przedsiębiorstwach po okresie transformacji, ‘Bank i Kredyt’, 40(6).