The Conditions for Recognition of the Home Office as Fixed Place of Business Constituting the Permanent Establishment of the Employer

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1509-877X.2024.04.02

Keywords:

permanent establishment, home office, remote work, right of disposal, OECD Model Convention

Abstract

The article raises the issue of the constitution of the permanent establishment through the fixed place of business in the form of the Home Office of the employee. As part of the article, a detailed analysis of the provisions of the OECD Model Convention and the Commentary thereto, views in the doctrine, jurisprudence of the administrative courts and the interpretation practice of the tax authorities were presented. Special attention was paid to the notion “at the disposal” and “effective power to use the location”, as well as the controversies arising from the interpretation of those notions. Subsequently the exclusion from the definition of the permanent establishment for auxiliary activities was discussed, as well as the many doubts it raises. According to the author, the presented subject matter calls into question the premise of having a fixed establishment at the disposal of the taxpayer as a condition for the creation of the permanent establishment in the modern knowledge-based economy. On the other hand, in the circumstances of mobile work gaining popularity, it is necessary to regulate the allocation of income between the states with consideration to the postulate for minimizing of imposing of administrative burdens on the taxpayers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bendlinger S., Steuerlicher Nexus durch „digitale Nomaden“ und der Sinn der Homeoffice-Betriebstätte, „SWI Steuer und Wirtschaft International” 2021, Bd. 9.
Google Scholar

Bendlinger S., Bendlinger V., Der VwGH zur Verfügungsmacht und das jähe Ende der Homeoffice-Betriebsstätte, „SWI Steuer und Wirtschaft International” 2022, Bd. 9.
Google Scholar

Bendlinger V., Romstorfer J., SWI-Jahrestagung: Homeoffice-Tätigkeit von Arbeitnehmern als Betriebsstätte des Arbeitgebers?, „SWI Steuer und Wirtschaft International” 2023, Bd. 9.
Google Scholar

Beretta G., „Work on the Move”: Rethinking Taxation of Labour Income under Tax Treaties, „International Tax Studies” 2022, vol. 5(2), https://doi.org/10.59403/3mgn45y
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.59403/3mgn45y

Brzeziński B., Lasiński-Sulecki K., Morawski W., Problemy wykładni międzynarodowych umów w sprawie unikania opodatkowania, sporządzonych w dwóch lub większej liczbie języków, „Kwartalnik Prawa Podatkowego” 2023, nr 1, https://doi.org/10.18778/1509-877X.2023.01.01
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1509-877X.2023.01.01

Laskowska M., Niedźwiedzki W., Powstanie zagranicznego zakładu w przypadku agenta zależnego i pracy zdalnej na podstawie orzecznictwa sądowego w Polsce, „Przegląd Podatkowy” 2023, nr 6.
Google Scholar

Lipniewicz R., Dysponowanie placówką, [w:] R. Lipniewicz, Podatkowy zakład zagraniczny. Koncepcja i funkcjonowanie, Warszawa 2017, LEX.
Google Scholar

Lipniewicz R., Zakład typu podstawowego w polskich umowach podatkowych, [w:] R. Lipniewicz, Podatkowy zakład zagraniczny. Koncepcja i funkcjonowanie, Warszawa 2017, LEX.
Google Scholar

Litwińczuk H., Międzynarodowe prawo podatkowe, Warszawa 2020.
Google Scholar

Majdańska A., Zastosowanie Modelu Konwencji OECD oraz Komentarza w praktyce polskich organów podatkowych i sądów administracyjnych, „Monitor Podatkowy” 2015, nr 6.
Google Scholar

OECD, Interpretation and Application of Article 5 (Permanent Establishment) of the OECD Model Tax Convention, 12 October 2011 to 10 February 2012, Paris 2011, https://web-archive.oecd.org/2012-06-14/91526-48836726.pdf (dostęp: 11.02.2024).
Google Scholar

OECD, Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital 2017, Full Version (as it read on 21 November 2017), Paris 2019, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/g2g972ee-en
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/g2g972ee-en

OECD, OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations 2022, Paris 2022, https://doi.org/10.1787/0e655865-en
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/0e655865-en

Owoc J., Glosa do wyroku Wojewódzkiego Sądu Administracyjnego w Gliwicach z dnia 31 stycznia 2022 r., sygn. I SA/Gl 1340/21, „Kwartalnik Prawa Podatkowego” 2023, nr 2, https://doi.org/10.18778/1509-877X.2023.03.09
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1509-877X.2023.02.08

Rasch S., Rosenberger F., Brülisauer P., Auswirkungen dezentraler Home-Office Aktivitäten auf die Betriebsstättenbegründung, Gewinnzuordnung und Arbeitnehmerbesteuerung, „Archiv für Schweizerisches Abgaberecht” 2020/2021, Bd. 89(9).
Google Scholar

Reimer E., Article 5. Permanent Establishment, [w:] Klaus Vogel on Double Taxation Conventions, red. E. Reimer, A. Rust, Alphen aan den Rijn 2015.
Google Scholar

Reimer E., Permanent Establishment in the OECD Model Tax Convention, [w:] E. Reimer, S. Schmid, M. Orell, Permanent Establishments: A Domestic Taxation, Bilateral Tax Treaty and OECD Perspective, Alphen aan den Rijn 2018.
Google Scholar

Rohner T., Home Office – Steuerliche Behandlung im grenzüberschreitenden Bereich, „Zeitschrift für Schweizerisches und Internationales Steuerrecht” 2015, Bd. 4.
Google Scholar

Schuster R., Verleger T., Wenn das Home zum Office wird – Bedingt jede Tätigkeit im Homeoffice eine Betriebsstätte im abkommensrechtlichen Sinn?, „IWB Internationales Steuer- und Wirtschaftsrecht” 2020, Bd. 21.
Google Scholar

Skaar A.A., Permanent Establishment: Erosion of a Tax Treaty Principle, Alphen aan den Rijn 2020.
Google Scholar

Wassermeyer H.C.F., Kaeser C., Art. 5, [w:] Doppelbesteuerung. Kommentar, Band 1, red. H.C.F. Wassermeyer, München 2019.
Google Scholar

Woźniak T., Powstanie zakładu a unikanie opodatkowania w międzynarodowym prawie podatkowym, Warszawa 2022.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.33226/0137-5490.2022.1.4

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Olszewska, M. (2025). The Conditions for Recognition of the Home Office as Fixed Place of Business Constituting the Permanent Establishment of the Employer. Tax Law Quarterly, (4), 35–64. https://doi.org/10.18778/1509-877X.2024.04.02

Issue

Section

Articles

PlumX metrics