On State of the Art of Discourse Studies in Poland: Towards Diagnosis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.11.4.09Keywords:
Discourse Analysis, Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), Symbolic Elites, Q ualitative Research Methods, Qualitative Research Methods, Inter- and Multi-Disciplinarity in the Social SciencesAbstract
This article provides reflection on the state-of-the-art and key challenges of qualitative discourse studies as a social science research method in Poland. It focuses on the so-called Workshops in Discourse Analysis [Warsztaty Analizy Dyskursu], a multidisciplinary research collaboration that, initially taking place informally at the University of Lodz, eventually evolved and became institutionalized as a national Consortium for Discourse Studies [Konsorcjum Analizy Dyskursu]. At its core, the article provides a critical review of the volume The Discourse of Symbolic Elites: Towards a Diagnosis (Dyskurs elit symbolicznych. Próba diagnozy [M. Czyżewski, K. Franczak, M. Nowicka, J. Stachowiak, eds., 2014]), which is the first major publication resulting from works of (selected) members of the aforementioned research consortium. As is argued in the article, the focal publication displays the significant amount of challenges faced by the multidisciplinary collaboration within the area of discourse studies. These challenges not only stem from the fact that discourse analysts working in Poland come from different arts & humanities and social science disciplines, but also are rooted in the fact that these researchers draw on various—and often significantly different— traditions in qualitative discourse studies, and often do not engage sufficiently in a constructive dialogue with existent and well-established approaches to discourse research. Hence, the article not only summarizes the key distinctive features of the volume under review, but also attempts to position the state-of-the-art of discourse analysis in Poland within the contemporary international landscape of (critical) discourse studies.
Downloads
References
Abousnnouga Gill, Machin David (2013) The Language of War Monuments. London: Bloomsbury Academics.
Google Scholar
Berglez Peter (2013) Global Journalism: Theory and Practice. New York: Peter Lang.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3726/978-1-4539-1088-7
Berglez Peter, Olausson Ulrika (2014) Media Research on Climate Change: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Heading? „Environmental Communication”, vol. 8, no. 2, s. 139‒141.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.910330
Billig Michael (1991) Ideology and Opinions. London: Sage.
Google Scholar
Carvalho Anabela, ed. (2008) Communicating Climate Change: Discourses, Mediations, and Perceptions. Braga: Centro de Estudos de Comunicação e Sociedade (CECS).
Google Scholar
Czyżewski Marek, Dunin Kinga, Piotrowski Andrzej, red. (2010a) Cudze problemy. O ważności tego, co nieważne. Analiza dyskursu publicznego w Polsce. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Akademickie i Profesjonalne.
Google Scholar
Czyżewski Marek, Kowalski Sergiusz, Piotrowski Andrzej, red. (2010b) Rytualny chaos. Studium dyskursu publicznego. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Akademickie i Profesjonalne.
Google Scholar
Czyżewski Marek i in., red. (2014) Dyskurs elit symbolicznych. Próba diagnozy. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Akademickie Sedno.
Google Scholar
Duszak Anna (1998) Tekst, dyskurs, komunikacja międzykulturowa. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Google Scholar
Duszak Anna, Fairclough Norman, red. (2008) Krytyczna analiza dyskursu: interdyscyplinarne podejście do komunikacji społecznej. Kraków: Universitas.
Google Scholar
Galasińska Aleksandra (2009) Small Stories Fight Back. Narratives of Polish Economic Migration on an Internet Forum [w:] Aleksandra Galasińska, Michał Krzyżanowski, eds., Discourse and Transformation in Central and Eastern Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, s. 188–203.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230594296_11
Galasińska Aleksandra (2010) Leavers and Stayers Discuss Returning Home: Internet Discourses on Migration in the Context of the Post-communist Transformation. „Social Identities”, vol. 16, no. 3, s. 309–324.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2010.482416
Horolets Anna, red. (2008) Analiza dyskursu w socjologii i dla socjologii. Toruń: Adam Marszałek.
Google Scholar
Koselleck Reinhart (2006) Crisis. „Journal of the History of Ideas”, vol. 67, no. 2, s. 357‒400.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.2006.0013
Krzyżanowska Natalia (2013) (Krytyczna) analiza dyskursu a (krytyczna) analiza gender: zarys synergii teoretycznej i metodologicznej. „Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej”, t. 9, nr 1, s. 62‒84.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.9.1.05
Krzyżanowska Natalia (2015) The Discourse of Counter-Monuments: Semiotics of Material Commemoration in Contemporary Urban Spaces. „Social Semiotics” [dostęp 30 października 2015 r.]. Dostępny w Internecie http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10350330.2015.1096132
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2015.1096132
Krzyżanowski Michał (2010) The Discoursive Construction of European Identities. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Google Scholar
Krzyżanowski Michał (2011) Political Communication, Institutional Cultures, and Linearities of Organisational Practice: A Discourse-Ethnographic Approach to Institutional Change in the European Union. „Critical Discourse Studies”, vol. 8, no. 4, s. 281‒296.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2011.601638
Krzyżanowski Michał (2013) Discourses and Concepts: Interfaces and Synergies Between Begriffsgeschichte and the Discourse-Historical Approach in CDA [w:] Ruth Wodak, ed., Critical Discourse Analysis (vol. 4). London: Sage, s. 111‒126.
Google Scholar
Lazar Michelle M., ed. (2005) Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis: Gender, Power, and Ideology in Discourse. London: Palgrave.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230599901
Mautner Gerlinde (2010) Language and the Market Society. Critical Reflections on Discourse and Dominance. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Rogers Rebecca (2011) An Introduction to Critical Discourse Analysis in Education. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203836149
Samman Amin (2015) Crisis Theory and the Historical Imagination. „Review of the International Political Economy” [dostęp 30 października 2015 r.]. Dostępny w Internecie http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09692290.2015.1011682
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2015.1011682
Sayer Andrew (2000) For Postdisciplinary Studies: Sociology and the Curse of Disciplinary Parochialism and Imperialism [w:] John T. Eldridge i in., eds., For Sociology: Legacies and Prospects. Durham: Sociology Press, s. 83‒91.
Google Scholar
Swales John (1988) Discourse Communities. Genres and English as an International Language. „World Englishes”, vol. 7 no. 2, s. 211‒220.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1988.tb00232.x
Triandafyllidou Anna, Wodak Ruth, Krzyżanowski Michał, eds. (2009) European Public Sphere and the Media: Europe in Crisis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230271722
Wodak Ruth (1996) Disorders of Discourse. London: Longman.
Google Scholar
Wodak Ruth (2006) Understanding the Concept(s) of „Discourse”. „Language in Society”, nr 35, s. 595–611.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450606026X
Wodak Ruth (2007) What Is Critical Discourse Analysis? „Forum: Qualitative Social Research”, vol. 8, no. 2, art. 29.
Google Scholar
Wodak Ruth, Krzyżanowski Michał, red. (2011) Jakościowa analiza dyskursu w naukach społecznych. Przełożyła Danuta Przepiórkowska. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Łośgraf.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.