Radical socialization? Analysis of the secondary socialization process in the table tennis environment

Julia Witkowska; Radosław Kossakowski

doi:10.18778/0208-600X.89.02

Authors

Julia Witkowska University of Gdańsk, Faculty of Social Science, Institute of Sociology https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0336-284X
Radosław Kossakowski University of Gdańsk, Faculty of Social Science, Institute of Sociology https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4150-9730

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-600X.89.02

Keywords:

secondary socialization, the social dimension of sports, values in sports, table tennis players, qualitative study

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of the secondary socialization process in the table tennis environment. Sports communities represent a specific case study in this context because the secondary socialization processes occurring in them seem more radical. The sports environment is characterized by highly specific features and values conveyed, and interest in this phenomenon may be heightened because sports are a relatively less studied area in terms of their socialization impact on individuals. The main goal of the text is to analyse the specificity of the table tennis environment as a secondary socialization environment. More specific goals include issues related to the specific bonds and relationships formed in such an environment, the specific communication system (slang and characteristic meanings), and the impact of the sports environment on the relations of table tennis players with the world outside of sports. The qualitative analysis allowed for discovering unique patterns that characterize the socialization process in the sports environment. Among these patterns is the blurring of boundaries between values acquired in the sports environment and the external world, as the respondents transferred sports principles to everyday life practices. The totality of socialization in the sports environment also influences the formation of a specific “socialization bubble” and problems in establishing relationships with people not belonging to the sports world: the sports environment became, for many respondents, a reality in itself, generating bonds, rules, and communication patterns for its participants.

References

Babbie E. (2013), Logika doboru próby, trans. A. Kloskowska-Dudzińska, Badania społeczne w praktyce, Warszawa, pp. 204–206.

Benson A.J., Evans M.B., Eys M.A. (2016), Socialization in team sport, “Scandinavian Journal of Medicine Science in Sports”, no. 26, pp. 463–473. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12460

Berger P., Luckamnn T. (2010), Społeczne tworzenie rzeczywistości. Traktat z socjologii wiedzy, trans. J. Niżnik, Warszawa.

Blumer H. (2007), Interakcjonizm symboliczny. Perspektywa i metoda, trans. G. Woroniecka, Zakład Wydawniczy NOMOS, Kraków, p. 61.

Ciok A., Lenartowicz M. (2020), Sportowi migranci. Zagraniczni zawodnicy w polskich ligach tenisa stołowego, AWF Warszawa, Warszawa (ISBN: 978-83-61830-43-6).

Dziubiński Z. (2011), Socjalizacja do kultury fizycznej, [in:] Dziubiński Z., Krawczyk Z., Lenartowicz M., Socjologia kultury fizycznej, Warszawa.

Elias N. (2008), Społeczeństwo jednostek, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.

Frankfort-Nachmias Ch., Nachmias D. (2001), Metody badawcze w naukach społecznych, Poznań, pp. 220–239.

Hałas E. (2006), Interakcjonizm symboliczny. Społeczny kontekst znaczeń, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa, pp. 70–81.

Hill A., Schücker L., Hagemann N., Babel S.A., MacMahon C., Strauß B. (2021), Attentional focusing in running: Implicit focus manipulations reflect the effects for explicit instructions, “International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology”, vol. 19(2), pp. 203–214.

Kacperczyk A. (2014), Autoetnografia – technika, metoda, nowy paradygmat?: o metodologicznym statusie autoetnografii, “Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej”, vol. 10(3), pp. 32–75.

Kowalczyk S. (2012), Podstawy i zakresy społecznej funkcji sportu, [in:] Dziubiński Z., Jankow-ski K.W. (ed.), Kultura fizyczna a socjalizacja, Warszawa, p. 28.

Lenartowicz M., Ciok A. (2020), Foreign players in top Polish table tennis leagues: sport cultures differences and perceived impact on Polish table tennis, “Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Sociologica”, no. 75, pp. 15–32, https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-600X.75.02

Leo F.M., López-Gajardo M.A., González-Ponce I., García-Calvo T., Benson, M. (2020), How socialization tactics relate to role clarity, cohesion, and intentions to return to soccer teams, “Psychology of Sport and Exercise”, no. 50, 101735.

Lipiec J. (2012), Socjalizacyjna lekcja sportu, [in:] Dziubiński Z., Jankowski K.W. (ed.), Kultura fizyczna a socjalizacja, Warszawa, p. 19.

Loland S. (2001), Fair Play in Sport. A Moral Norm System, London.

Mead G.H. (1975), Umysł, osobowość i społeczeństwo, trans. Zofia Wolińska, Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warszawa.

Miller P.K., Van Der Zee S., Elliott D. (2022). Pain, culture and pedagogy: a preliminary investigation of attitudes towards “reasonable” pain tolerance in the grassroots reproduction of a culture of risk, “Psychological Reports”, vol. 125(2), pp. 1086–1102.

Newman H.J.H., Howells K.L., Fletcher D. (2016), The Dark Side of Top Level Sport: An Autobiographic Study of Depressive Experiences in Elite Sport Performers, “Frontiers in Psychology”, no. 7, pp. 1–12.

Stavrou N.A.M., Psychountaki M., Georgiadis E., Karteroliotis K., Zervas Y. (2015), Flow theory – goal orientation theory: positive experience is related to athlete’s goal orientation, “Frontiers in Psychology”, no. 6, pp. 1–12.

Szacka B. (2003), Wprowadzenie do socjologii, Warszawa, p. 137.

Tillmann K.J. (2005), Teorie Socjalizacji. Społeczność, instytucja, upodmiotowienie, trans. G. Bluszcz, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa, pp. 8–19.