Analiza obrazów - przegląd metod i inspiracji teoretycznych

Tomasz Ferenc

doi:10.18778/0208-600X.32.01

Autor

Tomasz Ferenc Uniwersytet Łódzki

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-600X.32.01

Abstrakt

The article represents an attempt to review methods and techniques of analysis of various images. It contains elements of formal analysis, contents analysis, semiological studies, psychoanalytical variations, and two types of discourse analysis. The article also presents remarks concerning studies of public and reception of art. Each of the described methodology focuses on one aspect of a complex process where meaning, reception and image circulation are constructed. It was noted that each methodology possesses both strong and weak elements. It is necessary to become familiar with all of them, in order to utilise the best method of image interpretation for each individual study. The purpose of this article is to facilitate methodological choices.

Bibliografia

Akeret U. D. (1975) Photoanalisis. How to interpret the hidden psychological meaning of personal and public photographs. New York: Ed. Thomas Humber.

Barthes R. (2000), Mitologie, tłum. Adam Dziadek, Wydawnictwo KR, Warszwa.

Barthes R. (1996), Światło obrazu. Uwagi o fotografii, Warszawa, Wydawnictwo KR

Berger J. (1997), Sposoby widznia, tłum. Mariusz Bryl, Rebis, Poznań.

Ferenc T. (2004), Fotografia. Dyletanci, amatorzy i artyści, Łódź, Wydawnictwo f5.

Foucault M. (2002), Archeologia Wiedzy, tłum. Andrzej Siemek, Warszawa, Altaya.

Gervereau L. (2000), Voir, comprende analyser les images. Editions La Découverte, Paris.

Hall S. (1984), Encoding, decoding, [w:] Culture. Media. Language, (ed.) Hall S., Hobson D., Lowe A ., Willis P., Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies.

Matuchniak-Krasuska A. (1999), Publiczność wobec metafory plastycznej. O recepcji groteski Jerzego Dudy-Gracza, Łódź.

Matuchniak-Krasuska A. (1988), Gust i kompetencja, Łódź.

Metz Ch. (2006), Fotografia i fetysz, „Kwartalnik Filmowy”, nr 54-55, s. 246-254.

Mrozowski M. (2001), Media masowe. Władza, rozrywka i biznes. Warszawa, Aspra-Jr.

Olechnicki K. (2003), Antropologia obrazu. Fotografia jako metoda, przedmiot i medium nauk społecznych, Warszawa, Oficyna Naukowa.

Panofsky E. (1971), Studia z historii sztuki, Warszawa, PWN.

Pijarski K. (2007), Artysta jako archiwista, [w:] Anty fotografie, red. Mazur Adam, Poznań.

Rose G. (2001), Visual Methodologies. An Introduction to the lnteroretations of Visual Materials, Sage Publications.

Sekula A. (1982), On the Invention of Photographic Meaning, [w:] Thinking PhotograJiy, ed. Bürgin V. London. Macmillan.

Suren L. (1996), Photography, Vision, and the Production of Modern Bodies, New York.

Tagg J. (1988), The Burden of Representation. Essays on Photographies and Histories. London. Macmillan.

Tagg J. (1986), The silent picture show, [w:] Photographic Practices: Towards Different Image, (ed.) Bezencenet S., Corrigan P., London, Comedia Publishing Group.