Encountering Nature, Experiencing Courtly Love, and Romance of the Rose: Generic Standpoints, Interpretive Practices, and Human Interchange in 12th-13th Century French Poetics

Robert Prus

doi:10.18778/1733-8077.10.2.01

Authors

Robert Prus University of Waterloo, Canada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.10.2.01

Keywords:

Love, The Romance of the Rose, French Poets, Sexuality, Pragmatism, Symbolic Interaction, Philosophy, Sociology, Personification, Collective Events

Abstract

Whereas the fields of poetic expression and pragmatist philosophy may seem some distance apart, a closer examination of the poetics literature from the early Greeks onward provides testimony to the more general viability of the pragmatist analysis of community life, particularly as this has come to be associated with pragmatism’s sociological derivative, symbolic interaction.

Following a brief overview of the Greek, Roman, and Christian roots of contemporary fictional representations, attention is given to the ways that pragmatist concerns with human activity were addressed within the context of poetic expression in 12th-13th century France. Whereas the pre-Renaissance texts considered here exhibit pronounced attentiveness to Christian theology, they also build heavily on Latin sources (especially Virgil and Ovid [see Prus 2013a]).

Among the early French poets who address the matters of human knowing and acting in more direct and consequential terms are: Alan de Lille (c. 1120-1203) who wrote The Plaint of Nature and Anticlaudianus; Andreas Capellanus (text, c. 1185) the author of The Art of Courtly Love; and Guillaume de Lorris (c. 1212-1237) and Jean de Meun (c. 1235-1305) who, in sequence, co-authored The Romance of the Rose.

Given our interest in the ways in which those in the poetic community helped sustain an analytic focus on human lived experience, particular consideration is given to these early French authors’ attentiveness to (1) the relationships, identities, activities, and tactical engagements that people develop around romantic relationships; (2) the sense-making activities of those about whom they write, as well as their own interpretive practices as authors and analysts; (3) the ways in which the people within the communities that they portray knowingly grapple with religious and secular morality (and deviance); and (4) more generic features of human standpoints and relationships.

Clearly, the poets referenced here are not the first to pursue matters of these sorts. However, their materials are important not only for their popular intrigues, creativity, and effectiveness in “moving poetics out of the dark ages” but also for encouraging a broader interest in considerations of the human condition than that defined by philosophy and rhetoric.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Robert Prus, University of Waterloo, Canada

Robert Prus is a Sociologist (Professor Emeritus) at the University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. A symbolic interactionist, ethnographer, and social theorist, Robert Prus has been examining the conceptual and methodological connections of American pragmatist philosophy and its sociological offshoot, symbolic interactionism, with Classical Greek Latin, and interim scholarship. As part of this larger project, he has been analyzing a fuller range of texts produced by Emile Durkheim (most notably Durkheim’s later, but lesser known, works on morality, education, religion and philosophy), mindfully of their pragmatist affinities with Aristotle’s foundational emphasis on the nature of human knowing and acting, as well as Blumerian symbolic interactionism.

References

Aquinas, Thomas. 1981. Summa Thologica. Translated by the Fathers of the English Dominican Province. Ellen, TX: Christian Classics.
Google Scholar

Aristotle. 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle. Edited by Jonathan Barnes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar

Bernal, Martin. 1990. Cadmean Letters. The Transmission of the Alphabet to the Aegean and Future West before 1400 B.C. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
Google Scholar

Blumer, Herbert. 1969. Symbolic Interaction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Google Scholar

Boethius. 1962. The Consolation of Philosophy. Translated by Richard Green. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
Google Scholar

Capella, Martianus. 1997. The Marriage of Philology and Mercury. Translated by William Harris Stahl, Richard Johnson, with E. L. Burge. New York: Columbia University Press.
Google Scholar

Capellanus, Andreas. 1941. The Art of Courtly Love. Translated by John Jay Parry. New York: Norton.
Google Scholar

de Lille, Alan. 1973. Anticlaudianus or The Good and Perfect Man. Translated by James J. Sheridan. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.
Google Scholar

de Lille, Alan. 1989. The Plaint of Nature. Translated by James J. Sheridan. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.
Google Scholar

de Lorris, Guillaume and Jean de Meun. 1900. The Romance of the Rose. Translated by Frederick S. Ellis. London: Aldine.
Google Scholar

de Lorris, Guillaume and Jean de Meun. 1962. The Romance of the Rose. Translated by Harry W. Robbins. New York: Dutton.
Google Scholar

Grills, Scott and Robert Prus. 2008. “The Myth of the Independent Variable: Reconceptualizing Class, Gender, Race, and Age as Subcultural Processes.” The American Sociologist 39(1):19-37.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-007-9026-6

Lofland, John. 1976. Doing Social Life. New York: Wiley.
Google Scholar

Lucian of Samosata. 1913-1967. Lucian (VIII volumes). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar

Luria, Maxwell. 1982. A Reader’s Guide to the Roman de la Rose. Hamden, CN: Archon.
Google Scholar

Mead, George H. 1934. Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Ovid. 1957. The Loves, The Art of Beauty, The Remedies for Love, and The Art of Love. Translated by Rolfe Humphries. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Google Scholar

Plato. 1997. Plato: Complete Works. Edited by John M. Cooper. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
Google Scholar

Prus, Robert. 1996. Symbolic Interaction and Ethnographic Research: Intersubjectivity and the Study of Human Lived Experience. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Google Scholar

Prus, Robert. 1997. Subcultural Mosaics and Intersubjective Realities: An Ethnographic Research Agenda for Pragmatizing the Social Sciences. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Google Scholar

Prus, Robert. 1999. Beyond the Power Mystique: Power as Intersubjective Accomplishment. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Google Scholar

Prus, Robert. 2004. “Symbolic Interaction and Classical Greek Scholarship: Conceptual Foundations, Historical Continuities, and Transcontextual Relevancies.” The American Sociologist 35(1):5-33.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-004-1001-x

Prus, Robert. 2006. “In Defense of Knowing, In Defense of Doubting: Cicero Engages Totalizing Skepticism, Sensate Materialism, and Pragmatist Realism in Academica.” Qualitative Sociology Review 2(3):21-47.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.2.3.03

Prus, Robert. 2007a. “Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics: Laying the Foundations for a Pragmatist Consideration of Human Knowing and Acting.” Qualitative Sociology Review 3(2):5-45.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.3.2.02

Prus, Robert. 2007b. “Human Memory, Social Process, and the Pragmatist Metamorphosis: Ethnological Foundations Ethnographic Contributions and Conceptual Challenges.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 36(4):378-437.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241606299029

Prus, Robert. 2008a. “Aristotle’s Rhetoric: A Pragmatist Analysis of Persuasive Interchange.” Qualitative Sociology Review 4(2):24-62.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.4.2.02

Prus, Robert. 2008b. “On the Pragmatics and Problematics of Defining Beauty and Character: The Greek Poet Lucian (120-200) Engages Exacting Portraitures and Difficult Subjects.” Qualitative Sociology Review 4(1):3-20.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.4.1.01

Prus, Robert. 2008c. “Producing, Consuming, and Providing Instruction on Poetic Texts in the Classical Roman Era: The Pragmatist Contributions of Horace (65-8BCE), Longinus (100CE), and Plutarch (46-125CE).” Studies in Symbolic Interaction 30:81-103.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-2396(08)30006-4

Prus, Robert. 2008d. “Writing History for Eternity: Lucian’s (c120-200) Contributions to Pragmatist Scholarship and Ethnographic Analysis.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 37(1):62-78.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241607303964

Prus, Robert. 2009. “Poetic Expressions and Human Enacted Realities: Plato and Aristotle Engage Pragmatist Motifs in Greek Fictional Representations.” Qualitative Sociology Review 5(1):3-27.
Google Scholar

Prus, Robert. 2010. “Creating, Sustaining, and Contesting Definitions of Reality: Marcus Tullius Cicero (106-43BCE) as a Pragmatist Theorist and Analytic Ethnographer.” Qualitative Sociology Review 6(2):3-50.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.6.2.01

Prus, Robert. 2011a. “Defending Education and Scholarship in the Classical Greek Era: Pragmatist Motifs in the Works of Plato (c420-348BCE) and Isocrates (c436-338BCE).” Qualitative Sociology Review 7(1):1-35.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.07.1.01

Prus, Robert. 2011b. “Morality, Deviance, and Regulation: Pragmatist Motifs in Plato’s Republic and Laws.” Qualitative Sociology Review 7(2):1-44.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.07.2.01

Prus, Robert. 2011c. “On the Processes and Problematics of Representing Divinity: Dio Chrysostom (c40-120) and the Pragmatist Motif.” Pp. 205-221 History, Time, Meaning, and Memory: Ideas for the Sociology of Religion, edited by Barbara Jones Denison. Leiden: Brill.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004210622.i-269.63

Prus, Robert. 2011d. “Religion, Platonist Dialectics, and Pragmatist Analysis: Marcus Tullius Cicero’s Contributions to the Philosophy and Sociology of Divine and Human Knowing.” Qualitative Sociology Review 7(3):1-30.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.7.3.01

Prus, Robert. 2012. “On the Necessity of Re-engaging the Classical Greek and Latin Literatures: Lessons from Emile Durkheim’s The Evolution of Educational Thought.” The American Sociologist 43:172-202.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-012-9154-5

Prus, Robert. 2013a. “Generating, Intensifying, and Redirecting Emotionality: Conceptual and Ethnographic Implications of Aristotle’s Rhetoric.” Qualitative Sociology Review 9(4):6-42.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.9.4.01

Prus, Robert. 2013b. “Aristotle’s Theory of Education: Enduring Lessons in Pragmatist Scholarship.” Pp. 325-343 in The Chicago School Diaspora: Epistemology and Substance, edited by Jacqueline Lowe and Gary Bowden. Montreal, Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Google Scholar

Prus, Robert. 2013c. “Love, Despair, and Resiliency: Ovid’s Contributions to an Interactionist Analysis of Intimate Relations.” Qualitative Sociology Review 9(3):124-151.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.9.3.07

Prus, Robert. 2013d. “Representing, Defending, and Questioning Religion: Pragmatist Sociological Motifs in Plato’s Timaeus, Phaedo, Republic, and Laws.” Qualitative Sociology Review 9(1):8-42.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.09.1.01

Prus, Robert. 2014 [forthcoming in Qualitative Sociology Review]. “Engaging Love, Divinity, and Philosophy: Pragmatism, Personification, and AutoEthnographic Motifs in the Humanist Poetics of Brunetto Latini, Dante Alighieri, and Giovanni Boccaccio.”
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.10.3.01

Prus, Robert and Matthew Burk. 2010. “Ethnographic Trailblazers: Herodotus, Thucydides, and Xenophon.” Qualitative Sociology Review 6(3):3-28.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.6.3.01

Prus, Robert and Fatima Camara. 2010. “Love, Friendship, and Disaffection in Plato and Aristotle: Toward a Pragmatist Analysis of Interpersonal Relationships.” Qualitative Sociology Review 6(3):29-62.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.6.3.02

Prus, Robert and Scott Grills. 2003. The Deviant Mystique: Involvements, Realities, and Regulation. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Google Scholar

Puddephatt, Antony and Robert Prus. 2007. “Causality, Agency, and Reality: Plato and Aristotle Meet G. H. Mead and Herbert Blumer.” Sociological Focus 40(3):265-286.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00380237.2007.10571310

Strauss, Anselm. 1993. Continual Permutations of Action. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Google Scholar