Jane Addams and the Lost Paradigm of Sociology

Vessela Misheva

doi:10.18778/1733-8077.15.2.14

Authors

Vessela Misheva

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.15.2.14

Keywords:

Sociological Paradigm, Sociological Canon, Addams’s Sociological Identity, Comte’s Unfinished Project, Mechanism of Emulation, Symbolic Interactionism

Abstract

The present work is the beginning of a discussion that again addresses the question of Jane Addams’ sociological heritage. That latter is defined as a puzzle which may finally have a solution in that all of the pieces now appear to have been collected. The approach taken to recovering Addams’ identity as a sociologist involves a historico-sociological exploration of the influences upon the formation of her sociological thought, with a focus on Auguste Comte, the Father of Sociology. The article argues that Addams emulated Comte’s scientific mission and took upon herself the task of continuing his project by following another route to the goal. She is thus Comte’s successor, and even rival, insofar as she sought to establish sociology as a science that may be placed in charge of producing knowledge about social life and has the social mission of finding solutions to social problems that politicians proved incapable of tackling. Addams emerges from the discussion as the creator of a sociological paradigm that was dismissed, dismantled, and then lost in the process of the scientific revolution that took place unnoticed after the end of World War I, when the normal period of the scientific development of sociology in America came to an end. The suppression during the 1920s of the type of sociology that Addams developed and adhered to has left sociology in a state of unresolved identity crisis and arrested scientific development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Vessela Misheva

Vessela Misheva is a Professor of Sociology at the Department of Sociology, Uppsala University. She has also served as a Professor of Social Psychology at the University of Sködve, Sweden. She was awarded a Ph.D. in the philosophy of science from the Bulgaria Academy of Sciences, as well as a Ph.D. in sociology from Uppsala University. Misheva has also specialized in sociology and systems theory at Bielefeld University under the direction of Niklas Luhmann. From 1998 to 2006 she was a Vice-President of Research Committee 51 on Sociocybernetics and Systems Theory at the International Sociological Association (ISA) and served as a President of the Research Committee 36 on Alienation theory and Research at the ISA between 2010 and 2018. Her current research interests include the sociology of peace, the sociology of knowledge, classical sociology, the theory of self-conscious emotions, and the theory of self. Recent publications include Jane Addams and the Spirit of Social Entrepreneurship (co-edited) (2018), “Jane Addams and the Birth of Micro Sociology as a Science and a Social Enterprise” (2018), “Guilt: What’s So Good about Feeling Bad about Yourself” (2018), and “Lost in Vicissitudes of Greatness and Decline: Charles Horton Cooley’s Unique Contribution to Sociology” (2018).

References

Addams, Jane. 1910. Twenty Years at Hull-House with Autobiographical Notes. New York: MacMillan.
Google Scholar

Addams, Jane. 2002a [1910]. “The Snare of Preparation.” Pp. 100-113 in The Jane Addams Reader, edited by Jean Bethke Elshtain. New York: Basic Books.
Google Scholar

Addams, Jane. 2002b [1881]. “Cassandra.” Pp. 10-13 in The Jane Addams Reader, edited by Jean Bethke Elshtain. New York: Basic Books.
Google Scholar

Addams, Jane. 2002c [1893]. “The Subjective Necessity for a Social Settlement.” Pp. 14-28 in The Jane Addams Reader, edited by Jean Bethke Elshtain. New York: Basic Books.
Google Scholar

Addams, Jane. 2002d [1893]. “The Objective Value of a Social Settlement.” Pp. 29-45 in The Jane Addams Reader, edited by Jean Bethke Elshtain. New York: Basic Books.
Google Scholar

Baker, Keith M. 1989. “Closing the French Revolution: Saint-Simon and Comte.” Pp. 323-339 in The French Revolution and the Creation of Modern Political Culture: Vol. 3, The Transformation of Political Culture 1789-1848, edited by François Furet and Mona Ozouf. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-034260-3.50026-2

Bryant, C. G. A. 1975. “Kuhn, Paradigms and Sociology.” British Journal of Sociology 26:354-359.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/589851

Calhoun, Craig. 2007. “Preface.” Pp. ix-xiv in Sociology in America: A History, edited by Craig Calhoun. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Claeys, Gregory. 2005. “Early Socialism.” Pp. 184-191 in Encyclopedia of Nineteenth-Century Thought, edited by Gregory Claeys. London, New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203380420

Connell, R. W. 1997. “Why Is Classical Theory Classical?” American Journal of Sociology 102(6):1511-1557.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/231125

Cooley, Charles Horton. 1902. Human Nature and Social Order. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Google Scholar

Deegan, Mary Jo. 2005. Jane Addams and the Men of the Chicago School, 1892-1920. New Brunswick, London: Transaction Publishers.
Google Scholar

Eckberg, Douglas Lee and Lester Hill, Jr. 1979. “The Paradigm Concept and Sociology: A Critical Review.” American Sociological Review 44(6):925-937.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2094717

Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 2002. Jane Addams and the Dream of American Democracy. A Life. New York: BasicBooks.
Google Scholar

Franklin, Donna L. 1986. “Mary Richmond and Jane Addams: From Moral Certainty to Rational Inquiry in Social Work Practice.” Social Service Review 60(4):504-525.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/644396

Gouhier, Henri. 1933-1941. La Jeunesse d’Auguste Comte et la formation du positivisme, 3 volumes. Paris: Vrin.
Google Scholar

Harvey, Lee. 1982. “The Use and Abuse of Kuhnian Paradigms in the Sociology of Knowledge.” Journal of the British Sociological Association 16(1):85-101.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038582016001009

Kuhn, Thomas. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Linn, James Weber. 1935. Jane Addams: A Biography. New York, London: D. Appleton-Century.
Google Scholar

Long, Norman. 1990. “From Paradigm Lost to Paradise Regained? The Case for an Actor-Oriented Sociology of Development.” European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies 49:3-24.
Google Scholar

Lubove, Roy. 1965. The Professional Altruist: The Emergence of Social Work as a Career 1880-1930. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674420939

Misheva, Vessela. 2018. “Jane Addams and the Birth of Sociology as a Science and a Social Enterprise.” Pp. 219-274 in Jane Addams’ Sociology and the Spirit of Social Entrepreneurship, edited by Vessela Misheva and Andrew Blasko. Uppsala: Uppsala University, Studia Sociological Upsaliensia 65.
Google Scholar

Misheva, Vessela. 2019. “Lost in Vicissitudes of Greatness and Decline: Charles Horton Cooley’s Unique Contribution to Sociology.” Pp. 37-73 in Updating Charles H. Cooley. Contemporary Perspectives on a Sociological Classic, edited by Natalia Ruiz-Junco and Baptiste Brossard. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315104515-3

Parsons, Talcott. 1968a. “Cooley and the Problem of Internalization.” Pp. 48-67 in Cooley and Sociological Analysis, edited by Albert J. Reiss. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Google Scholar

Parsons, Talcott. 1968b. “Introduction to the Paperback Edition.” Pp. v-xiv in Talcott Parsons, The Structure of Social Action, vol. II. New York: Free Press.
Google Scholar

Pickering, Mary. 1993. “Auguste Comte and the Saint-Simonians.” French Historical Studies 18(1):211-236.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/286964

Ritzer, George. 1975. “Sociology: A Multiple Paradigm Science.” The American Sociologist 10(3):156-167.
Google Scholar

Seigfried, Charlene Haddock. 2010. “Cultural Contradictions: Jane Addams’s Struggles with the Life of Art and the Art of Life.” Pp. 55-79 in Feminist Interpretations of Jane Addams, edited by Maurice Hamington. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Google Scholar

Stebner, Eleanor J. 2010. “The Theology of Jane Addams: Religion Seeking Its Own Adjustment.” Pp. 201-222 in Feminist Interpretations of Jane Addams, edited by Maurice Hamington. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Google Scholar

Turner, Jonathan, Leonard Beeghley, and Charles H. Powers. 2007. The Emergence of Sociological Theory. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
Google Scholar

Turner, Stephen Park and Jonathan H. Turner. 1990. The Impossible Science. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar