What Counts as Qualitative Research? Some Cautionary Comments
Keywords:Qualitative Research, Interviews, Data Analysis, Social Theory
Many PhD students begin as unconscious Naturalists or Emotionalists using interview studies to report people’s “experience” of an unquestioned social “problem.” An analysis of articles in one journal shows that this naïve use of interview data has become the common currency of qualitative research. In a critique of one such article, I show how interview studies may simply reproduce interviewees’ own accounts, glossed over by a few social science categories. By “mining” interviews for apposite extracts, such researchers lose sight of how sequence is consequential for what we say and do. Much more needs to be done if qualitative research is not to be just a set of techniques but an analytic project, different from journalism.
Atkinson, Paul and David Silverman. 1997. “Kundera’s Immortality: The Interview Society and the Invention of Self.” Qualitative Inquiry 3(3):324-345.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/107780049700300304
Czarniawska, Barbara. 2012. “When is it time to move on?” Plenary delivered at ESA Qualitative Research Mid-Term Conference, September 21, University of Lund, Sweden.
Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Gubrium, Jaber F. and James A. Holstein. 1997. The New Language of Qualitative Method. New York: Oxford University Press.
Holstein, James A. and Jaber F. Gubrium. 2011. “Animating Interview Narratives.” Pp. 149-167 in Qualitative Research, edited by David Silverman. London: Sage.
Silverman, David. 2011. Interpreting Qualitative Data, 4th ed. London: Sage.
Silverman, David. 2013. Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical Handbook, 4th ed. London: Sage.
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.