Influence Work, Resistance, and Educational Life-Worlds: Quintilian’s [Marcus Fabius Quintilianus] (35-95 CE) Analysis of Roman Oratory as an Instructive Ethnohistorical Resource and Conceptual Precursor of Symbolic Interactionist Scholarship

Robert Prus

doi:10.18778/1733-8077.18.3.01

Authors

Robert Prus University of Waterloo, Canada https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9310-974X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.18.3.01

Keywords:

Quintilian, Rhetoric, Aristotle, Cicero, Roman Oratory, Education, Symbolic Interactionism, Ethnohistory, Persuasive Interchange, American Pragmatism, Impression Management, Courtroom Exchanges

Abstract

Despite the striking affinities of classical Greek and Latin rhetoric with the pragmatist/interactionist analysis of the situated negotiation of reality and its profound relevance for the analysis of human group life more generally, few contemporary social scientists are aware of the exceptionally astute analyses of persuasive interchange developed by Aristotle, Cicero, and Quintilian.

Having considered the analyses of rhetoric developed by Aristotle (384-322 BCE) and Cicero (106-43 BCE) in interactionist terms (Prus 2007a; 2010), the present paper examines Quintilian’s (35-95 CE) contributions to the study of persuasive interchange more specifically and the nature of human knowing and acting more generally.

Focusing on the education and practices of orators (rhetoricians), Quintilian (a practitioner as well as a distinctively thorough instructor of the craft) provides one of the most sustained, most systematic analyses of influence work and resistance to be found in the literature.

Following an overview of Quintilian’s “ethnohistorical” account of Roman oratory, this paper concludes by drawing conceptual parallels between Quintilian’s analysis of influence work and the broader, transcontextual features of symbolic interactionist scholarship (Mead 1934; Blumer 1969; Prus 1996; 1997; 1999; Prus and Grills 2003). This includes “generic social processes” such as: acquiring perspectives, attending to identity, being involved, doing activity, engaging in persuasive interchange, developing relationships, experiencing emotionality, attaining linguistic fluency, and participating in collective events. Offering a great many departure points for comparative analysis, as well as ethnographic examinations of the influence process, Quintilian’s analysis is particularly instructive as he addresses these and related aspects of human knowing, acting, and interchange in highly direct, articulate, and detailed ways.

Acknowledging the conceptual, methodological, and analytic affinities of The Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian with symbolic interactionism, an epilogue, Quintilian as an Intellectual Precursor to American Pragmatist Thought and the Interactionist Study of Human Group Life, addresses the relative lack of attention given to classical Greek and Latin scholarship by the American pragmatists and their intellectual progeny, as well as the importance of maintaining a more sustained transcontextual and transhistorical focus on the study of human knowing, acting, and interchange.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Robert Prus, University of Waterloo, Canada

Robert Prus is a sociologist (Professor Emeritus) at the University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. A symbolic interactionist, ethnographer, and social theorist, Robert Prus has been examining the conceptual and methodological connections of American pragmatist philosophy and its sociological offshoot, symbolic interactionism, with Classical Greek, Latin, and interim scholarship. In addition to his work on the developmental flows of pragmatist social thought in rhetoric, he also has been studying the flows of Western social thought in the interrelated areas of poetics (fictional representations), philosophy, ethnohistory, religion, education and scholarship, love and friendship, politics and governing practices, and deviance and morality.

References

Aristotle. 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle. Edited by Jonathan Barnes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar

Billig, Michael. 1996. Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Blumer, Herbert. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Google Scholar

Burke, Kenneth. 1953 [1931]. Counter-Statement. 2nd ed. Los Altos, CA: Hermes.
Google Scholar

Burke, Kenneth. 1959 [1937]. Attitudes toward History. 2nd ed. Los Altos, CA: Hermes.
Google Scholar

Burke, Kenneth. 1961. The Rhetoric of Religion: Studies in Logology. Boston: Beacon Press.
Google Scholar

Burke, Kenneth. 1966. Language as Symbolic Action: Essays on Life, Literature, and Method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520340664

Burke, Kenneth. 1969a [1945]. A Grammar of Motives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Google Scholar

Burke, Kenneth. 1969b [1950]. A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Google Scholar

Cicero, Marcus Tullius. 1942. De Oratore (Two Volumes). Translated by E. W. Sutton and H. Rackham. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/DLCL.marcus_tullius_cicero-de_oratore.1942

Cicero, Marcus Tullius. 1962a. Brutus. Translated by G. L. Hendrickson. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar

Cicero, Marcus Tullius. 1962b. Orator. Translated by H. M. Hubbell. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar

Clarke, M. L. 1996. Rhetoric at Rome. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Cloeren, Herman. 1988. Language and Thought: German Approaches to Analytic Philosophy in the 18th and 19th Centuries. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110865684

Conley, Thomas M. 1990. Rhetoric in the European Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Cooper, Martha D. and William Nothstine. 1992. Power Persuasion: Moving an Ancient Art into the Media Age. Greenwood, IN: The Education Video Group.
Google Scholar

D’Angelo, Frank J. 1975. A Conceptual Theory of Rhetoric. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.
Google Scholar

Danisch, Robert. 2007. Pragmatism, Democracy, and the Necessity of Rhetoric. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
Google Scholar

Durkheim, Emile. 1915 [1912]. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. Translated by Joseph Ward Swain. London: Allen and Unwin.
Google Scholar

Durkheim, Emile. 1961 [1902-1903]. Moral Education: A Study in the Theory and Application of the Sociology of Education. Translated by Everett K. Wilson and Herman Schnurer. New York: Free Press.
Google Scholar

Durkheim, Emile. 1977 [1904-1905]. The Evolution of Educational Thought. Translated by Peter Collins. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Google Scholar

Durkheim, Emile. 1983 [1913-1914]. Pragmatism and Sociology. Translated by J. C. Whitehouse. Edited and Introduced by John B. Allcock. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Durkheim, Emile. 1993 [1887]. “La Science Positive de la Morale en Allemagne [The Scientific Study of Morality in Germany].” Pp. 58-135 in Ethics and the Sociology of Morals. Translated with an Introduction by Robert T. Hall. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus.
Google Scholar

Farrell, Thomas B. 1995. Norms of Rhetorical Culture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor.
Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1963. Stigma. London: Penguin.
Google Scholar

Grassi, Ernesto. 2001 [1980]. Rhetoric as Philosophy. Translated by John Michael Krois and Azizeh Azodi. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Google Scholar

Grills, Scott and Robert Prus. 2019. Management Motifs: An Interactionist Approach for the Study of Organizational Interchange. Basel: Springer International.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93429-7

Gusfield, Joseph R. 1963. Symbolic Crusade: Status Politics and the American Temperance Movement. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Google Scholar

Gusfield, Joseph R. 1981. The Culture of Public Problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Gusfield, Joseph R. 1989. Kenneth Burke: On Symbols and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Gusfield, Joseph R. 1996. Contested Meanings: The Construction of Alcohol Problems. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Google Scholar

Kastely, James L. 1997. Rethinking the Rhetorical Tradition: From Plato to Postmodernism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar

Kennedy, George. 1963. The Art of Persuasion in Greece. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar

Kennedy, George. 1972. The Art of Rhetoric in the Roman World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar

Kennedy, George. 1980. Classical Rhetoric and Its Christian and Secular Tradition from Ancient to Modern Times. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1770910

Kennedy, George. 1983. Greek Rhetoric under Christian Emperors. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar

Kennedy, George. 1989. The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521300063

Kennedy, George. 1991. Aristotle on Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse. New York: Oxford.
Google Scholar

Kennedy, George. 1999. Classical Rhetoric and Its Christian and Secular Tradition from Ancient to Modern Times. 2nd ed. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
Google Scholar

Kinneavy, James L. 1990. “Contemporary Rhetoric.” Pp. 186-241 in The Present State of Scholarship in Historical and Contemporary Rhetoric (revised edition), edited by W. B. Horner. Columbia, MS: University of Missouri Press.
Google Scholar

Klapp, Orrin. 1962. Heroes, Villains and Fools. San Diego, CA: Aegis.
Google Scholar

Klapp, Orrin. 1964. Symbolic Leaders. Chicago: Aldine.
Google Scholar

Klapp, Orrin. 1971. Social Types: Process, Structure and Ethos. San Diego, CA: Aegis.
Google Scholar

Lyman, Stanford and Marvin Scott. 1970. Sociology of the Absurd. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Google Scholar

MacKendrick, Paul. 1989. The Philosophical Books of Cicero. London: Duckworth.
Google Scholar

Mead, George H. 1934. Mind, Self and Society. Edited by Charles W. Morris. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Murphy, James J. 1974. Rhetoric in the Middle Ages: A History of Rhetorical Theory from Saint Augustine to the Renaissance. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Google Scholar

Murphy, James J. 1989. Medieval Rhetoric: A Select Bibliography. 2nd ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442677197

Murphy, James J. and Richard A. Katula. 2003. A Synoptic History of Classical Rhetoric. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410607492

Nienkamp, Jean. 2001. Internal Rhetorics: Toward a History and Theory of Self-Persuasion. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Google Scholar

Ogden, C. K. and I. A. Richards. 1946 [1923]. The Meaning of Meaning: A Study of the Influence of Language upon Thought and of the Science of Symbolism. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
Google Scholar

Perelman, Chaim. 1982. The Realm of Rhetoric. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Google Scholar

Perelman, Chaim and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1996. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Translated by John Wilkinson and Purcell Weaver. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Google Scholar

Plato. 1997. Plato: The Complete Works. Edited by John M. Cooper and D. S. Hutchinson. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
Google Scholar

Prus, Robert. 1996. Symbolic Interaction and Ethnographic Research: Intersubjectivity and the Study of Human Lived Experience. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Google Scholar

Prus, Robert. 1997. Subcultural Mosaics and Intersubjective Realities. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Google Scholar

Prus, Robert. 1999. Beyond the Power Mystique: Power as Intersubjective Accomplishment. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Google Scholar

Prus, Robert. 2003. “Ancient Precursors.” Pp. 19-38 in Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism, edited by L. T. Reynolds and N. J. Herman-Kinney. New York: Altamira Press.
Google Scholar

Prus, Robert. 2004. “Symbolic Interaction and Classical Greek Scholarship: Conceptual Foundations, Historical Continuities, and Transcontextual Relevancies.” The American Sociologist 35(1):5-33.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-004-1001-x

Prus, Robert. 2006. “In Defense of Knowing, In Defense of Doubting: Cicero Engages Totalizing Skepticism, Sensate Materialism, and Pragmatist Realism in Academica.” Qualitative Sociological Review 2(3):21-47.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.2.3.03

Prus, Robert. 2007a. “Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics: Laying the Foundations for a Pragmatist Consideration of Human Knowing and Acting.” Qualitative Sociology Review 3(2):5-45.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.3.2.02

Prus, Robert. 2007b. “The Intellectual Canons of a Public Sociology: Pragmatist Foundations, Historical Extensions, and Humanly Engaged Realities.” Pp. 195-235 in Public Sociology: The Contemporary Debate, edited by L. T. Nichols. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315127781-9

Prus, Robert. 2008a. “Aristotle’s Rhetoric: A Pragmatist Analysis of Persuasive Interchange.” Qualitative Sociology Review 4(2):24-62.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.4.2.02

Prus, Robert. 2008b. “Producing, Consuming, and Providing Instruction on Poetic Texts in the Classical Roman Era: The Pragmatist Contributions of Horace (65-8BCE), Longinus (100CE), and Plutarch (46-125CE).” Studies in Symbolic Interaction 30:81-103.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-2396(08)30006-4

Prus, Robert. 2009a. “Poetic Expressions and Human Enacted Realities: Plato and Aristotle Engage Pragmatist Motifs in Greek Fictional Representations.” Qualitative Sociology Review 5(1):3-27.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.5.1.01

Prus, Robert. 2009b. “Reconceptualizing the Study of Community Life: Emile Durkheim’s Pragmatism and Sociology.” The American Sociologist 40:106-146.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-009-9066-1

Prus, Robert. 2010. “Creating, Sustaining, and Contesting Definitions of Reality: Marcus Tullius Cicero (106-43 BCE) as a Pragmatist Theorist and Analytic Ethnographer.” Qualitative Sociology Review 6(2):3-27.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.6.2.01

Prus, Robert. 2011a. “Defending Education and Scholarship in the Classical Greek Era: Pragmatist Motifs in the Works of Plato (c420-348BCE) and Isocrates (c436-338BCE).” Qualitative Sociology Review 7(1):1-35.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.07.1.01

Prus, Robert. 2011b. “Morality, Deviance, and Regulation: Pragmatist Motifs in Plato’s Republic and Laws.” Qualitative Sociology Review 7(2):1-44.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.07.2.01

Prus, Robert. 2011c. “Examining Community Life ‘in the Making’: Emile Durkheim’s Moral Education.” The American Sociologist 42:56-111.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-010-9119-5

Prus, Robert. 2011d. “Religion, Platonist Dialectics, and Pragmatist Analysis: Marcus Tullius Cicero’s Contributions to the Philosophy and Sociology of Divine and Human Knowing.” Qualitative Sociology Review 7(3):1-30.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.7.3.01

Prus, Robert. 2012. “On the Necessity of Re-Engaging the Classical Greek and Latin Literatures: Lessons from Emile Durkheim’s The Evolution of Educational Thought.” The American Sociologist 43:172-202.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-012-9154-5

Prus, Robert. 2013a. “Aristotle’s Theory of Education: Enduring Lessons in Pragmatist Scholarship.” Pp. 325-343 in The Chicago
Google Scholar

School Diaspora: Epistemology and Substance, edited by J. Lowe and G. Bowden. Montreal, Kingston: McGill-Queens University Press.
Google Scholar

Prus, Robert. 2013b. “Generating, Intensifying, and Redirecting Emotionality: Conceptual and Ethnographic Implications of Aristotle’s Rhetoric.” Qualitative Sociology Review 9(4):6-42.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.9.4.01

Prus, Robert. 2013c. “Representing, Defending, and Questioning Religion: Pragmatist Sociological Motifs in Plato’s Timaeus, Phaedo, Republic, and Laws.” Qualitative Sociology Review 9(1):8-42.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.09.1.01

Prus, Robert. 2013d. “Love, Despair, and Resiliency: Ovid’s Contributions to an Interactionist Analysis of Intimate Relations.” Qualitative Sociology Review 9(3):124-151.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.9.3.07

Prus, Robert. 2015. “Aristotle’s Theory of Deviance and Contemporary Symbolic Interactionist Scholarship: Learning from the Past, Extending the Present, and Engaging the Future.” The American Sociologist 46(1):122-167.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-014-9250-9

Prus, Robert. 2017. “Kenneth Burke’s Dramatistic Pragmatism: A Missing Link between Classical Greek Scholarship and the Interactionist Study of Human Knowing and Acting.” Qualitative Sociology Review 13(2):6-58.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.13.2.01

Prus, Robert. 2019. “Engaging the Pragmatist Sociological Paradigm: Emile Durkheim and the Scientific Study of Morality.” Qualitative Sociology Review 15(1):6-34.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.15.1.01

Prus, Robert and Matthew Burk. 2010. “Ethnographic Trailblazers: Herodotus, Thucydides, and Xenophon.” Qualitative Sociology Review 6(3):3-28.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.6.3.01

Prus, Robert and Fatima Camara. 2010. “Love, Friendship, and Disaffection in Plato and Aristotle: Toward a Pragmatist Analysis of Interpersonal Relationships.” Qualitative Sociology Review 6(3):29-62.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.6.3.02

Prus, Robert and Scott Grills. 2003. The Deviant Mystique: Involvements, Realities, and Regulation. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Google Scholar

Puddephatt, Antony and Robert Prus. 2007. “Causality, Agency, and Reality: Plato and Aristotle Meet G. H. Mead and Herbert Blumer.” Sociological Focus 40(3):265-286.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00380237.2007.10571310

Quintilian [Marcus Fabius Quintilianus]. 1891. Institutes of Oratory or Education of an Orator. Translated by John Selby Watson. London: George Bell and Sons.
Google Scholar

Quintilian [Marcus Fabius Quintilianus]. 1920. The Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian. Translated by H. E. Butler. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar

Rosenfield, Lawrence. 1971. “An Autopsy of the Rhetorical Tradition.” Pp. 64-77 in The Prospect of Rhetoric, edited by L. F. Ritzer and E. Black. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Google Scholar

Spangler, Sister Mary Michael. 1998. Aristotle on Teaching. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Google Scholar

Stewart, Donald C. 1990. “The Present State of Scholarship in Historical and Contemporary Rhetoric.” Pp. 151-185 in The Present State of Scholarship in Historical and Contemporary Rhetoric (revised edition), edited by W. B. Horner. Columbia, MS: University of Missouri Press.
Google Scholar

Strauss, Anselm L. 1993. Continual Permutations of Action. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Google Scholar

Vickers, Brian. 1988. In Defense of Rhetoric. Oxford: Clarendon.
Google Scholar

Vitanza, Victor J. 1994. Writing Histories of Rhetoric. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Google Scholar

Walker, Jeffery. 2000. Rhetoric and Poetics in Antiquity. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar