Religion, Platonist Dialectics, and Pragmatist Analysis: Marcus Tullius Cicero’s Contributions to the Philosophy and Sociology of Divine and Human Knowing

Robert Prus

doi:10.18778/1733-8077.7.3.01

Authors

Robert Prus University of Waterloo, Canada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.7.3.01

Keywords:

Religion, God(s), Cicero, Plato, Philosophy, Pragmatism, Symbolic Interaction, Dialectic Analysis, Knowing, Epicureanism, Stoicism, Fatalism, Divination

Abstract

Whereas Socrates, Plato, Aristotle and Augustine are probably the best known of the early Western philosophers of religion, Marcus Tullius Cicero (106-43 BCE) also played a particularly consequential role in the development and continuity of Greco-Latin-European social thought. Cicero may be best known for his work on rhetoric and his involvements in the political intrigues of Rome, but Cicero’s comparative examinations of the Greco-Roman philosophies of his day merit much more attention than they have received from contemporary scholars. Cicero’s considerations of philosophy encompass much more than the theological issues considered in this statement, but, in the process of engaging Epicurean and Stoic thought from an Academician (Platonist) perspective, Cicero significantly extends the remarkable insights provided by Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle. Although especially central to the present analysis, Cicero’s On the Nature of the Gods (1972) is only one of several texts that Cicero directs to a comparative (multiparadigmatic and transhistorical) analysis of divine and human knowing. Much of Cicero’s treatment of the philosophy of religion revolves around variants of the Socratic standpoints (i.e., dialectics, theology, moralism) that characterized the philosophies of Cicero’s era (i.e., Stoicism, Epicureanism, Academician dialectics), but Cicero also engages the matters of human knowing and acting in what may be envisioned as more distinctively pragmatist sociological terms. As well, although Cicero’s materials reflect the socio-historical context in which he worked, his detailed analysis of religion represents a valuable source of comparison with present day viewpoints and practices. Likewise, a closer examination of Cicero’s texts indicates that many of the issues of divine and human knowing, with which he explicitly grapples, have maintained an enduring conceptual currency. This paper concludes with a consideration of the relevance of Cicero’s works for a contemporary pragmatist sociological (symbolic interactionist) approach to the more generic study of human knowing and acting.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Robert Prus, University of Waterloo, Canada

Robert Prus is a Sociologist at the University of Waterloo, Canada. A symbolic interactionist and ethnographer, Robert Prus has been examining the conceptual and methodological connections of American pragmatist philosophy and its sociological offshoot, symbolic interactionism, with Classical Greek and Latin scholarship.

References

Aquinas, Thomas St. 1981. Summa Theologica. 5 volumes. Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province. Ellen, TX: Christian Classics.
Google Scholar

Aristotle. 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle. Edited by Jonathan Barnes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar

Augustine. 1984. City of God. Translated by Henry Bettenson. New York: Penguin.
Google Scholar

Augustine. 1995. Against the Academicians. Translated by Peter King. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
Google Scholar

Berger, Peter and Thomas Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Anchor.
Google Scholar

Blumer, Herbert. 1969. Symbolic Interaction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Google Scholar

Cicero. 1914. De Finibus Bonorum et Malorum [On Ends of Good and Evil]. Translated by H. Rackham. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/DLCL.marcus_tullius_cicero-de_finibus_bonorum_et_malorum.1914

Cicero. 1923a. De Divinatione [On Divination]. Translated by William Armistead Falconer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/DLCL.marcus_tullius_cicero-de_divinatione.1923

Cicero. 1923b. De Amicitia [On Friendship]. Translated by William Armistead Falconer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/DLCL.marcus_tullius_cicero-de_amicitia.1923

Cicero. 1928a. De Legibus [Laws]. Translated by Clinton Walker Keyes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/DLCL.marcus_tullius_cicero-de_legibus.1928

Cicero. 1928b. De Re Pubica [Republic]. Translated by Clinton Walker Keyes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar

Cicero. 1942a. De Fato [On Fate]. Translated by H. Rackham. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/DLCL.marcus_tullius_cicero-de_fato.1942

Cicero. 1942b. De Oratore. 2 volumes. Translated by E. W. Sutton and H. Rackham. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/DLCL.marcus_tullius_cicero-de_oratore.1942

Cicero. 1945. Tusculan Disputations. Translated by J. E. King [First printed in 1927]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar

Cicero. 1949a. De Inventione. Translated by H. M. Hubbell. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/DLCL.marcus_tullius_cicero-de_inventione.1949

Cicero. 1949b. Topica [Topics]. Translated by H. M. Hubbell. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/DLCL.marcus_tullius_cicero-topica.1949

Cicero. 1951a. De Natura Deorum [On the Nature of the Gods]. Translated by H. Rackham. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar

Cicero. 1951b. Academica. Translated by H. Rackham. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar

Cicero. 1962a. Brutus. Translated by G. L. Hendrickson. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar

Cicero. 1962b. Orator. Translated by H. M. Hubbell. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar

Cicero. 1972. The Nature of the Gods. Translated by Horace C. P. McGregor. New York: Penguin.
Google Scholar

Durkheim, Emile. 1915 [1912]. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Translated by Joseph Ward Swain. London: Allen and Unwin.
Google Scholar

Heilman, Samuel. 1998. Synagogue Life: A Study in Symbolic Interaction. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Google Scholar

Heilman, Samuel. 2002. People of the Book: Drama, Fellowship, and Religion. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Google Scholar

Hume, David. 1957. Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. New York: Hafner.
Google Scholar

Jorgensen, Danny L. 1992. The Esoteric Scene, Cultic Milieu, and Occult Tarot. New York: Garland.
Google Scholar

Kleinknecht, Steven. 2007. “An Interview with Robert Prus: His Career, Contributions, and Legacy as an Interactionist Ethnographer and Social Theorist.” Qualitative Sociology Review 3(2):221-288. Retrieved December 4, 2011 http://www.qualitativesociologyreview.org/ENG/Volume7/QSR_3_2_Kleinknecht.pdf
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.3.2.12

Kleinman, Sheryl. 1984. Equals Before God: Seminarian as Humanist Professionals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Lofland, John. 1977 [1966]. The Doomsday Cult: A Study in Conversion, Proselytization and Maintenance of Faith. New York: Irvington Publishers.
Google Scholar

Luckmann, Thomas. 1967. The Invisible Religion. New York: Macmillan.
Google Scholar

MacKendrick, Paul. 1989. The Philosophical Books of Cicero. London: Duckworth.
Google Scholar

Mead, George H. 1934. Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Plato. 1937. The Dialogues of Plato. Edited by Benjamin Jowett. New York: Random House.
Google Scholar

Plato. 1997. Plato: The Collected Works. Edited by John M. Cooper. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
Google Scholar

Prus, Robert. 1976. “Religious Recruitment and the Management of Dissonance: A Sociological Perspective.” Sociological Inquiry 46(2):127-134.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1976.tb00757.x

Prus, Robert. 1996. Symbolic Interaction and Ethnographic Research: Intersubjectivity and the Study of Human Lived Experience. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Google Scholar

Prus, Robert. 1997. Subcultural Mosaics and Intersubjective Realities: An Ethnographic Research Agenda for Pragmatizing the Social Sciences. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Google Scholar

Prus, Robert. 1999. Beyond the Power Mystique: Power as Intersubjective Accomplishment. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Google Scholar

Prus, Robert. 2003. “Ancient Precursors.” Pp. 19-38 in Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism, edited by Larry T. Reynolds and Nancy J. Herman-Kinney. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
Google Scholar

Prus, Robert. 2004. “Symbolic Interaction and Classical Greek Scholarship: Conceptual Foundations, Historical Continuities, and Transcontextual Relevancies.” The American Sociologist 35(1):5-33.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-004-1001-x

Prus, Robert. 2005. “Terrorism, Tyranny, and Religious Extremism as Collective Activity: Beyond the Deviant, Psychological, and Power Mystiques.” The American Sociologist 36(1):47-74.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-005-1009-x

Prus, Robert. 2006. “In Defense of Knowing, In Defense of Doubting: Cicero Engages Totalizing Skepticism, Sensate Materialism, and Pragmatist Realism in Academica.” Qualitative Sociology Review 2(3):21-47. Retrieved December 4, 2011 http://www.qualitativesociologyreview.org/ENG/Volume5/QSR_2_3_Prus.pdf
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.2.3.03

Prus, Robert. 2007a. “Aristotle‟s Nicomachean Ethics: Laying the Foundations for a Pragmatist Consideration of Human Knowing and Acting.” Qualitative Sociology Review 3(2):5-45. Retrieved December 4, 2011 http://www.qualitativesociologyreview.org/ENG/Volume7/QSR_3_2_Prus.pdf
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.3.2.02

Prus, Robert. 2007b. “Human Memory, Social Process, and the Pragmatist Metamorphosis: Ethnological Foundations, Ethnographic Contributions and Conceptual Challenges.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 36(4):378-437.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241606299029

Prus, Robert. 2008a. “Aristotle‟s Rhetoric: A Pragmatist Analysis of Persuasive Interchange.” Qualitative Sociology Review 4(2):24-62. Retrieved December 4, 2011 http://www.qualitativesociologyreview.org/ENG/Volume10/QSR_4_2_Prus.pdf
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.4.2.02

Prus, Robert. 2008b. “Producing, Consuming, and Providing Instruction on Poetic Texts in the Classical Roman Era: The Pragmatist Contributions of Horace (65-8BCE), Longinus (100CE), and Plutarch (46-125CE).” Studies in Symbolic Interaction 30:81-103.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-2396(08)30006-4

Prus, Robert. 2008c. “Writing History for Eternity: Lucian‟s (c120-200) Contributions to Pragmatist Scholarship and Ethnographic Analysis.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 37(1):62-78.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241607303964

Prus, Robert. 2009a. “Poetic Expression and Human Enacted Realities: Plato and Aristotle Engage Pragmatist Motifs in Greek Fictional Representations.” Qualitative Sociology Review 5(1):3-27. Retrieved December 4, 2011 http://www.qualitativesociologyreview.org/ENG/Volume12/QSR_5_1_Prus.pdf
Google Scholar

Prus, Robert. 2009b. “Reconceptualizing the Study of Community Life: Emile Durkheim‟s Pragmatism and Sociology.” The American Sociologist 40:106-146.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-009-9066-1

Prus, Robert. 2010. “Creating, Sustaining, and Contesting Definitions of Reality: Marcus Tullius Cicero (106-43BCE) as a Pragmatist Theorist and Analytic Ethnographer.” Qualitative Sociology Review 6(2):3-50. Retrieved December 4, 2011 http://www.qualitativesociologyreview.org/ENG/Volume16/QSR_6_2_Prus.pdf
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.6.2.01

Prus, Robert. 2011. “Examining Community Life «in the Making»: Emile Durkheim's Moral Education.” The American Sociologist 42:56-111.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-010-9119-5

Prus, Robert and Scott Grills. 2003. The Deviant Mystique: Involvements, Realities, and Regulation. Westport, CN: Praeger.
Google Scholar

Shaffir, William. 1974 Life In A Religious Community: The Lubavitcher Chassidim In Montreal. Toronto: Holt, Rinehart and Winston of Canada.
Google Scholar

Shaffir, William. 1978a. “Becoming an Orthodox Jew: The Socialization of Newcomers in a Chassidic Community.” Pp. 295-309 in The Canadian Ethnic Mosaic: A Quest for Identity, edited by L. Dreidger. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.
Google Scholar

Shaffir, William. 1978b. “Witnessing as Identity Consolidation: The Case of Lubavitcher Chassidim.” Pp.39-57 in Identity and Religion, edited by H. Mol. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar

Shaffir, William. 1983. “Hassidic Jews and Quebec Politics.” The Jewish Journal of Sociology 25(2):105-118.
Google Scholar

Shaffir, William. 1987. “Separated From the Mainstream: The Hassidic Community of Tash.” The Jewish Journal of Sociology 29(1):19-35.
Google Scholar

Shaffir, William. 1991. “Conversion Experiences: Newcomers to and Defectors from Orthodox Judaism.” Pp. 173-202 in Tradition, Innovation, Conflict: Jewishness and Judaism in Contemporary Israel, edited by Z. Sobel and B. Beit Hallahmi. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Google Scholar

Shaffir, William. 1993. “Jewish Messianism Lubavitch Style: An Interim Report.” The Jewish Journal of Sociology 35(2):115-128.
Google Scholar

Shaffir, William. 1995a. “Boundaries and Self-Presentation among Hasidim: A Study in Identity Maintenance.” Pp. 31-68 in New World Hasidim: Ethnographic Studies of Hasidic Jews in America, edited by J. Belcove-Shalin. New York: SUNY Press.
Google Scholar

Shaffir, William. 1995b. “When Prophecy Is Not Validated: Explaining the Unexpected in a Messianic Campaign.” The Jewish Journal of Sociology 37(2):119-136.
Google Scholar

Shaffir, William. 1998a. “Doing Ethnographic Research in Jewish Orthodox Communities: The Neglected Role of Sociability.” Pp. 48-64 in Doing Ethnographic Research: Fieldwork Settings, edited by S. Grills. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar

Shaffir, William. 1998b. “Still Separated From the Mainstream: A Hassidic Community Revisited.” The Jewish Journal of Sociology 39(1-2):46-62.
Google Scholar

Shaffir, William. 2000a. “Hassidim and the Rebbe: Some Initial Observations.” The Jewish Journal of Sociology 42(1-2):73-85.
Google Scholar

Shaffir, William. 2000b. “Movements in and out of Orthodox Judaism: The Cases of Penitents and the Disaffected.” Pp. 269-285 in Joining and Leaving Religion: Research Perspectives, edited by L. J. Francis, Y. J. Katz. Trowbridge, Waltshire: Gracewing.
Google Scholar

Shaffir, William. 2001. “Fieldwork among Hassidic Jews: Moral Challenges and Missed Opportunities.” The Jewish Journal of Sociology 43(1-2):53-69.
Google Scholar

Shaffir, William. 2002. “Outremont‟s Hassidim and their Neighbours: An Eruv and its Repercussions.” The Jewish Journal of Sociology 44(1-2):56-71.
Google Scholar

Shaffir, William. 2004. “Secular Studies In a Hassidic Enclave: «What Do We Need It For?»” The Jewish Journal of Sociology 46(1-2):59-77.
Google Scholar

Shaffir, William. 2006. “The Renaissance of Hassidism.” The Jewish Journal of Sociology 48(1-2):69-74.
Google Scholar

Shaffir, William. 2007. “Hassidim Confronting Modernity.” The Jewish Journal of Sociology 49(1):5-35.
Google Scholar

Shepherd, Gordon. 1987. “The Social Construction of a Religious Prophecy.” Sociological Inquiry 57:394-414.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1987.tb00246.x

Strauss, Anselm. 1993. Continual Permutations of Action. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Google Scholar