Пространственность как семантико-грамматическая особенность русского языка (в сравнении с болгарским языком)

Lyudmila Karpenko

doi:10.18778/1731-8025.21.07

Authors

Lyudmila Karpenko https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8432-1164

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1731-8025.21.07

Keywords:

Russian, Bulgarian, spatiality, semantic-grammatical dominant, grammatical conceptualization

Abstract

The article deals with the linguistic conceptualization of space in the Russian language. The relevance of the article is due to the importance of studying the specific features of the Russian language.

The aim of the article is to trace the degree of expressiveness of locality in comparison with the Bulgarian language. The material used comes from the National Corpus of the Russian language, the Bulgarian National Corpus, translated texts, and dictionaries. Spatiality in the Russian language is considered a semantic-grammatical dominant, revealed at different linguistic levels.

The study uses systemic, comparative, and functional methods. The effectiveness and relevance of the named methods is connected with the possibility to present the specific features of the Russian language in the expression of spatiality in a comprehensive approach, to show this category as a semantic-grammatical dominant of the Russian language, which is manifested both in the language system at different levels, and in speech. Its more explicit manifestation in comparison with the Bulgarian language is traced in the comparative analysis at the levels of phraseology, grammar, and text.

It is demonstrated that the Russian language in the totality of its expressive means draws attention to the spatial picture of the world with maximum explication and detailing of real object-spatial relations contained in the situation. The differences in the linguistic interpretation of space, revealed in the Russian and Bulgarian material, are due to both extra-linguistic and linguistic factors – the peculiarities of the system properties of the languages, their lexico-grammatical resources, and typological characteristics.

The significance of the study for the theory and practice of teaching Russian as a foreign language is noted.

References

Апресян, Ю.Д. (1995). Интегральное описание языка и системная лексикография. В: Ю.Д. Апресян. Избранные труды. Том 2. Москва: Языки русской культуры.
Google Scholar

Арутюнова, Н.Д. (1976). Предложение и его смысл: логико-семантические проблемы. Москва: Наука.
Google Scholar

аспекты. Mосква: «Школа русской культуры».
Google Scholar

Български национален корпус, http://www.search.dcl.bas.bg, доступ: 11.02.2022.
Google Scholar

Влахов, С. (1980). Русско-болгарский фразеологический словарь. Москва: Русский язык; София: Наука и изкуство.
Google Scholar

Карпенко, Л.Б. (1984). Способы выражения локальности в русском и болгарском языках, Съпоставително езикознание, 1, 20–28.
Google Scholar

Карпенко, Л.Б. (1988). Соотношение предлогов горизонтальной ориентации в русском и болгарском языках, Съпоставително езикознание, 6, 13–17.
Google Scholar

Национальный корпус русского языка, http://www.ruskorpora.ru, доступ: 28.12.2022.
Google Scholar

Телия, В.Н. (1996). Русская фразеология. Семантический, прагматический и лингвокультуро-логический аспекты. Mосква: «Школа русской культуры».
Google Scholar

Уорф, Б (1960). Наука и языкознание, Новое в лингвистике, 1, 169–182.
Google Scholar

Эверетт, Д.Л. (2016). Не спи – кругом змеи! Быт и язык индейцев амазонских джунглей. Сост. А.Д. Кошелев. Москва: Издательский Дом ЯСК.
Google Scholar

Humboldt, W. (2019). Linguistic Variability and Intellectual Development. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Google Scholar

Sapir, E. (1921). An Introduction to the Study of Speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
Google Scholar

Arutyunova, N.D. (1976). Predlozhenie i ego smysl: logiko-semanticheskie problemy. Moscow: Nauka.
Google Scholar

B”lgarski natsionalen korpus, http://www.search.dcl.bas.bg accessed: 11.02.2022.
Google Scholar

Everett, D.L. (2016). Ne spi – krugom zmei! Byt i yazyk indeitsev amazonskikh dzhunglei. Sost. A.D. Koshelev. Moscow: Izdatel’skii Dom YaSK.
Google Scholar

Humboldt, W. (2019). Linguistic Variability and Intellectual Development. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Google Scholar

Karpenko, L.B. (1984). Sposoby vyrazheniya lokal’nosti v russkom i bolgarskom yazykakh, S”postavitelno ezikoznanie, 1, 20–28.
Google Scholar

Karpenko, L.B. (1988). Sootnoshenie predlogov gorizontal’noi orientatsii v russkom i bolgarskom yazykakh, S”postavitelno ezikoznanie, 6, 13–17.
Google Scholar

Natsional’nyi korpus russkogo yazyka, http://www.ruskorpora.ru, accessed: 28.12.2022.
Google Scholar

Sapir, E. (1921). An Introduction to the Study of Speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
Google Scholar

Teliya, V.N. (1996). Russkaya frazeologiya. Semanticheskii, pragmaticheskii i lingvokul’turologicheskii aspekty. Moscow: Shkola «Yazyki russkoi kul’tury».
Google Scholar

Uorf, B. (1960). Nauka i yazykoznanie, Novoe v lingvistike, 1, 169–182, https://doi.org/10.3406/bude.1960.3893
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/bude.1960.3893

Vlakhov, S. (1980). Russko-bolgarskii frazeologicheskii slovar’. Moscow: Russkii yazyk; Sofiya: Nauka i izkustvo.
Google Scholar