Proporcja liczby wyrazów faktycznych i przeciętnych tekstu w kontekście siedmiostopniowej skali trudności jasnopis.pl

Tomasz Moździerz

doi:10.18778/0860-6587.28.22

Authors

Tomasz Moździerz Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Szkoła Doktorska Nauk Humanistycznych (językoznawstwo), ul. Czapskich 4, 31-110 Kraków https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2037-0469

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0860-6587.28.22

Keywords:

Readability, text difficulty, average word

Abstract

The length of a text will be different depending on the choice of unit, if that should be the number of Actual Words (AW) or Average Words (APW, Moździerz 2020). The ratio of AW to APW in a text changes along with this text’s difficulty. An analysis of the ratio’s change across seven levels of readability on jasnopis.pl (publicly accessible program to asses the difficulty of Polish texts) scale was done. Ten thousand words from authentic Polish texts were collected for each level on jasnopis.pl, and their examination allowed the capture of the ratio’s change. As a result, a table of ratio proportional to different readability levels was created, which allows the easy assessment of any Polish text’s difficulty, by comparison of the text’s ratio to the table. Such an easily accessible assessment tool can be used in the process of Polish language education.

References

Alderson J., 2000, Assessing Reading, Cambridge.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511732935

Broda B., Ogrodniczuk M., Nitoń B., Gruszczyński W., 2014, Measuring Readibility of Brysbaert M., 2019, How many words do we read per minute? A review and meta-analysis of reading rate https://psyarxiv.com/xynwg/ (dostęp: 29.05.2020), DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/xynwg
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/xynwg

Carver R.P., 1972, Evidence for the invalidity of the Miller-Coleman Readability Scale, „Journal of Reading Behavior”, nr 4(3), s. 42–47.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10862967109546999

Carver R.P., 1976, Word Length, Prose Difficulty and Reading Rate, „Journal of Reading Behavior”, nr 8(2) s. 193–204.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10862967609547176

Carver R.P., 1977–78, Toward a Theory of Reading Comprehension and Rauding, „Reading Research Quarterly”, nr 13(1), s. 8–63.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/747588

Charzyńska E., 2015, Text topic interest, the willingness to read and the level of reading comprehension among adults — the role of gender and education level, „The New Educational Review”, vol. 39, nr 1, s. 84–95.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2015.39.1.07

Charzyńska E., Dębowski Ł., 2015, Empirical verification of the Polish formula of text difficulty, „Cognitive Studies”, nr 15, s. 125–132 https://doi.org/10.11649/cs.2015.010 (dostęp: 29.05.2020).
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.11649/cs.2015.010

Chen X., Meurers D., 2018, Word frequency and readability: Predicting the text-level readability with a lexical-level attribute, „Journal Research in Reading”, t. 41, nr 3, s. 486–510. DOI:10.1111/1467-9817.12121
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12121

Crossley S., Skalicky S., Dascalu M., 2019, Moving beyond classic readability formulas: new methods and new models, „Jorunal of Research in Reading”, t. 42, nr 3–4, s. 541–561. DOI:10.1111/1467-9817.12283
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12283

Dale E., Tyler R.W., 1934, A Study of the Factors Influencing the Difficulty of Reading Materials for Adults of Limited Reading Ability, „The Library Quarterly: Information, Community, Policy”, nr 4(3), s. 384–412.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/613490

Dębowski Ł., Nitoń B., Broda B., Charzyńska E., 2015, Jasnopis – A Program to Compute Readibility of Texts in Polish based on Psycholinguistic Research, w: B. Sharp, W. Lubaszewski, R. Delmonte (red.), Natural Language Processing and Cognitive Science, Proceedings 2015, Kraków, s. 51–61.
Google Scholar

DuBay W.H., 2004, The Principles of Readability https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228965813_The_Principles_of_Readability (dostęp: 15.09.2020).
Google Scholar

Ellis N. C., 2002, Frequency Effects in Language Processing: A Review with Implications for Theories of Implicit and Explicit Language Acquisition, „Studies in Second Language Acquisition”, nr 24(2), s. 143–188. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102002024
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102002024

Grabe W., 2009, Reading in a Second Language, Cambridge.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195384253.013.0006

Gray W., Leary S., 1935, What makes a book readable, Chicago.
Google Scholar

Gruszczyński W. i in., 2015, Measuring Readability of Polish Texts, w: Z. Vetulani, J. Mariani (red.), Materiały Konferencji LTC 2015 (7th Language & Technology Conference: Human Language Technologies as a Challenge for Computer Science and Linguistics, Poznań, 27–29 listopada 2015), Poznań, s. 445–449.
Google Scholar

Lado, R., 1955, Patterns of Difficulty in Vocabulary, „Language Learning”, nr 6(1), s. 23–41 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1955.tb00829.x
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1955.tb00829.x

Laufer B., 1990, Why Some Words are More Difficult Than Others, „IRAL”, nr 28(4), s. 293–307 https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1990.28.4.293
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1990.28.4.293

Na L., Nation, I.S.P. (1985). Factors Affecting Guessing Vocabulary in Context. “RELC Journal”, nr 16(1), s. 33–42 https://doi.org/10.1177/003368828501600103
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/003368828501600103

Piekot T., Zarzeczny G., Moroń E., 2019, Standard „plain language” w polskiej sferze publicznej, w: M. Zaśko-Zielińska, K. Kredens (red.), Lingwistyka kryminalistyczna. Teoria i praktyka, Wrocław, s. 197–214.
Google Scholar

Pisarek, W., 1972. Frekwencja wyrazów w prasie: wiadomości, komentarze, reportaże, „Biblioteka wiedzy o prasie, seria B”, t. 16, Kraków.
Google Scholar

Polish Texts: Baseline Experiments, w: N. Calzolari i in. (red.). Materiały z konferencji LREC 2014 (9th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Rejkiawik, 26–31 maja 2014), Rejkiavik, s. 573–580.
Google Scholar

Reeves L.M., Hirsch-Pasek K., Golinkoff R., 2005, Słowa i znaczenia – od pojęć pierwotnych do złożonych struktur, w: J. Berko Gleason, N. B. Ratner (red.), Psycholingwistyka, Gdańsk, s. 173–240.
Google Scholar

Seretny A., 2006, Wskaźnik czytelności tekstu jako pomoc w określaniu stopnia jego trudności, „Ling-Varia”, nr 2(2), s. 87–98.
Google Scholar

Seretny A., 2011, Kompetencja leksykalna uczących się języka polskiego jako obcego w świetle badań ilościowych, Kraków.
Google Scholar

Seretny A., 2016, Stopień trudności słowa w perspektywie glottodydaktycznej, „Języki Obce w Szkole”, nr 60(1), s. 18–25.
Google Scholar

Sigurd B., Eeg-Olofsson M., van de Weijer J., 2004, Word Length, Sentence Length and Frequency – Zipf Revisited, „Studia Linguistica”, nr 58(1), s. 37–52.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0039-3193.2004.00109.x

Sung Y.T. i in., 2015, Leveling L2 Texts Through Readability: Combining Multilevel Linguistic Features with the CEFR, „The Modern Language Journal”, t. 99, nr 2, s. 371–379.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12213

Wolter D., 2017, Moving readers from struggling to proficient, „The Phi Delta Kappan”, nr 99, s. 37–39.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721717728277

Yeni-Koshian G., 2005, Percepcja mowy, w: J. Berko Gleason, N.B. Ratner (red.), Psycholingwistyka, Gdańsk, s. 121–173.
Google Scholar