Regional Innovation Systems in Sweden
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/2082-4440.16.06Keywords:
regional innovation systems, knowledge bases, institutions, SwedenAbstract
Over the past two decades, social scientists and governments have been paying more and more attention to regions as designated sites of innovation and competitiveness in the globalizing economy. Thus, innovation and innovation systems are becoming increasingly interesting to policy‐makers as ways of achieving their economic and social goals. Europe 2020, the European Union’s key strategy for the current decade, aims to foster a smart, sustainable, and inclusive economy. “Innovation has been placed at the heart of the strategy”, as it provides the “best means of successfully tackling major societal challenges” (European Commission 2010, p. 2). The new age of capitalism requires a new kind of region. In effect, regions are increasingly defined by the same criteria and elements which comprise a knowledge-intensive firm: continuous improvement, new ideas, knowledge creation and organizational learning (Florida 2003, p. 236). The increased policy and research interest in regional clusters and innovation systems reflects the growing significance of the regional level, and the importance of specific and regional resources, for stimulating the innovation capability and competitiveness of firms. The social and interactive practice of innovation also points to the importance of the relationship between the firm and its environment. The learning economy perspective affirms that learning and innovation are localized, not placeless processes (Storper 1997). Thus, it emphasizes that innovation is a territorially-embedded process, based not only on resources that are place specific but also on social and institutional contexts (Asheim, lsaksen 2002). This paper describes the role of innovations in Sweden and Swedish regions in development and growth, mainly by analysing the concept of regional innovation systems. Moreover, the actors and associations from the innovation system perspective are pointed out in the article. An analysis of the policy documents and a literature overview was the basis of the empirical material. Data comes from the OECD and EUROSTAT databases.
References
Asheim B.T., Coenen L., Svensson-Henning M. (2003) Nordic SMEs and Regional Innovation Systems – Final Report. Oslo, Nordic Industrial Fund (http://www.nordicinnovation.net).
Google Scholar
Asheim B.T., Gertler M.S. (2004), Regional Innovation Systems and the Geographical Foundations of Innovation, [in:] Fagerberg J., Mowery D., Nelson R.R. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford.
Google Scholar
Asheim B.T., Isaksen A. (2002), Regional Innovation Systems: The Integration of Local ‘Sticky’ and Global ‘Ubiquitous’ Knowledge, “Journal of Technology Transfer”, Vol. 27.
Google Scholar
Beije P. (1998), Technological change in the modern economy: basic topics and new developments, Cheltenham.
Google Scholar
Cooke P. (1992), Regional Innovation Systems: Competitive Regulation in the New Europe, Geoforum 23.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7185(92)90048-9
Cooke P. (1998), Introduction: Origins of the Concept, [in:] Braczyk H., Cooke P., Heidenreich M. (eds.) (1998) Regional Innovation Systems, London.
Google Scholar
Cooke P. (2001), Regional Innovation Systems, Clusters, and the Knowledge Economy, “Industrial and Corporate Change”, Vol. 10 (4).
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/10.4.945
Doloreux D. (2002), What We Should Know About Regional Systems of Innovation, “Technology in Society”, Vol. 24.
Google Scholar
Edquist C., 1997. Introduction, [in:] Edquist, C. (ed.), Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organisations, London.
Google Scholar
European Regional Development Fund, (2010), Innovation System Guidebook, http://eit.europa.eu (8.02.2016).
Google Scholar
European Commission (2010), Innovation Union Scoreboard 2010.The Innovation Union’s performance scoreboard for research and Innovation, Directorate-General for Enterprise and Industry, February 2011.
Google Scholar
European Commission (2010), European Competitiveness report 2010. An integrated Industrial Policy for the Globalisation Era Putting Competitiveness and Sustainability at Front Stage, Directorate-General for Enterprise and Industry, SEC (2010) 1272.
Google Scholar
EUROSTAT, http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat (8.02.2016)
Google Scholar
Florida R. (2003), The Learning Region [in:] Zoltan J.A. (ed.) Regional Innovation Knowledge and Global Change, London.
Google Scholar
Freeman C. (ed.) (1987) Technology policy and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. London.
Google Scholar
Johnsen I., Olsen L. (2014), Regional Innovation Monitor Plus - Southern Sweden.
Google Scholar
Johnsen I., Fredricsson Ch. (2014), Regional Innovation Monitor Plus – West Sweden.
Google Scholar
Kuhlmann S., Arnold E. (2001), RCN in the Norwegian Research and Innovation System. Background report No 12 in the evaluation of the Research Council in Nor-way, Royal Norwegian Ministry for Education, Research and Church Affairs, Oslo.
Google Scholar
Lindqvist M. (2012), Regional Innovation Monitor Plus – Northern Central Sweden.
Google Scholar
Lundvall B.-Å., Borras S. (1997) The Globalising Learning Economy: Implications for Innovation Policy, European Communities, Luxembourg.
Google Scholar
Lundvall B-Å. (ed.) (1992), National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, London.
Google Scholar
Maddison A. (2006) The World Economy. Vol. 1–2, OECD.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8411.2005.00164.x-i1
Metcalfe I. (1997), National Innovation System, OECD.
Google Scholar
Nelson, R.R. (ed.) (1993), National Innovation Systems. A Comparative Analysis, New York.
Google Scholar
Nilsson, L. (2011), Efter Industrialismen: Urbaniseringoch Tätortsutveckling I Sverige 1950–2005, Malmö.
Google Scholar
OECD (2010), Innovation Strategy: Innovation to Strengthen Growth and Address Global and Social Challenges.
Google Scholar
OECD (2012), Main Science and Technology Indicators, 2012/1, Paris.
Google Scholar
Patel P., Pavitt K. (1994), National innovation systems: why they are important and how they might be measured and compared, “Economics of Innovation and New Technology”, Vol. 3.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599400000004
Schön L., (2004), Total Factor Productivity in Swedish Manufacturing in the Period 1870–2000, In Exploring Economic Growth: Essays in Measurement and Analysis, [in:] Heikkinen S., van Zanden J.L. (eds.), A Festschrift for Riitta Hjerppe on Her Sixtieth Birthday, Amsterdam.
Google Scholar
Soja E.W. (2009), Regional Planning and Development Theories [in:] Thrift N., Kitchin R. (eds.), International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, Oxford UK.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102295-5.10733-4
Storper M. (1997), The Regional World. Territorial Development in a Global Economy, New York and London.
Google Scholar
Swedish Agency for Economic and Regional Growth (2011), Statistik, (https://tillvaxtverket.se/statistik.html).
Google Scholar
Swedish Institute (2011), The Swedish Innovation Strategy, N2012.33.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.