Institutional Complementarity of Poland in Terms of Diversity of Capitalism

Authors

  • Maciej Wysocki Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/2082-4440.14.03

Keywords:

institutional complementarity, diversity of capitalism, cluster analysis, k-nearest neighbours method, k-mean method, principal component analysis

Abstract

Poland is one of the most significant examples of a transition country in Central and Eastern Europe. After 45 years of being a centrally planned economy Poland emerged at the end of the 1980’s a free-market economy. In 2004 Poland became a member of the European Union, which was another milestone in the transition process. Undoubtedly, institutions were a very important factor in Poland’s economic transition. It seems that the horizon of 25 years since the fall of communism has created a decent prospect to evaluate the balance of economic transition in terms of the quality of institutions. However, comparative studies do not analyse institutions separately, but consider them together in an institutional framework.
The purpose of this essay is to examine the scope of the institutional complementarity of Poland in terms of Diversity of Capitalism. The main thesis of the article is that after more than two decades since the first stage of the economic transition, and one decade after joining the European Union, Poland’s institutional complementarity is, in general, at a satisfactory level. However, there is a very low level of institutional complementarity in the case of interaction between the labour market and the financial system. Furthermore, the Polish model of capitalism seems to be quite different from other countries from the peer group of transition economies (for example the Czech Republic or Hungary). The research method which was used in this essay includes statistical methods (in particular the K-Nearest Neighbours Method, K-Mean Method and Principal Component Analysis).

References

Amable B. (2003), The Diversity of Modern Capitalism, Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/019926113X.001.0001

Arthur, B. (1994), Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.10029

Estevez-Abe M., Iversen T., Soskice D. (2001), Social Protection and the Formation of Skills: A Reinterpretation of the Welfare State, chapter in “Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage” edited by Hall P. and Soskice D., Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0199247757.003.0004

Friedman M., Friedman R. (1979), Free to Choose, Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Gatti D., Rault Ch., Vaubourg A. (2010), Unemployment and finance: how do financial and labour market factors interact?, William Davidson Institute Working Paper No. 973, January 2010.
Google Scholar

Gross D., Steinherr A. (2005), Economic Transition in Central and Eastern Europe, Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805646

Hoffmann I. (2010), Principal Component Analysis with FactoMineR, Institutfür Statistik und Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie.
Google Scholar

Kolodko G., Rutkowski M. (1991), The Problem of Transition from a Socialist to a Free Market Economy: The Case of Poland, “The Journal of Social, Political and Economic Studies”, Summer, 1991, Vol. 16, No. 2.
Google Scholar

Krugman P., Wells R. (2005), Microeconomics, New York: Worth Publishers.
Google Scholar

Levine R. (1990), Stock Markets, Growth and Policy, “Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System International Finance Discussion Papers”, No. 374.
Google Scholar

Matthews R.C.O. (1986), The Economics of Institutions and the Sources of Economic Growth, “Economic Journal 96:4, pp. 903–918.
Google Scholar

North D.C. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678

Sen A. (2007), Capability and well-being, chapter in “The Philosophy of Economics. An Anthology” edited by Hausman D.M., Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Topkis, D.M. (1998), Supermodularity and Complementarity, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400822539

Williamson O. (2000), The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead, “Journal of Economic Literature”, Vol. XXXVIII (September 2000), pp. 595–613.
Google Scholar

Yildiz M. (2010), Lecture Notes on Supermodular Games, MIT Open Course Ware.
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2016-06-30

How to Cite

Wysocki, M. (2016). Institutional Complementarity of Poland in Terms of Diversity of Capitalism. Ekonomia Międzynarodowa (International Economics), (14), 133–157. https://doi.org/10.18778/2082-4440.14.03

Issue

Section

Articles