Miłość i poezja w Elegii 2.30 Sekstusa Propercjusza

Autor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-0319.24.04

Słowa kluczowe:

Propercjusz, elegia rzymska, mitologia

Abstrakt

Elegy 2.30 has been considered to be one of Propertius’ most difficult poems due to its complicated sequence of thought and distant associations noticeable in the discourse, which was often the reason for dividing the text into two separate poems. The article is an interpretative proposal aimed at demonstrating the integrity of 2.30, which was obtained by the poet by combining the concept of love with the concept of love poetry, as well as by using subtly constructed mythological references.

Biogram autora

Antoni Bobrowski - Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

dr hab. Antoni Bobrowski – Associate Professor of Classics at the Jagiellonian University, Cracow, Poland. He focuses his research interests on two main fields: the history of Roman literature, and the reception of ancient cultural heritage in the Polish and European literary tradition. His recent research deals with various aspects of the reception of the Homeric tradition in antiquity, as well as in later literary periods.

Bibliografia

Butler-Barber (1933). The Elegies of Propertius. Edited with an introduction and commentary by H.E. Butler, E.A. Barber. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Google Scholar

Camps, W.A. (1967). Propertius, Elegies, Book II. Edited by W.A. Camps. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (repr. 1985).
Google Scholar

Enk, P.J. (1962). Sexti Properti Elegiarum liber secundus cum prolegomenis, notis criticis, commentario exegetico. Edidit P.J. Enk, vol. I–II. Leiden: In Aedibus A.W. Sijthoff.
Google Scholar

Fedeli, P. (1984). Sexti Properti elegiarum libri IV. Edidit Paolo Fedeli Stuttgart: Teubner.
Google Scholar

Fedeli, P. (1985). Properzio, Il Libro Terzo delle Elegie. Introduzione testo e commento di Paolo Fedeli. Bari: Adriatica Editrice.
Google Scholar

Helm, R. (1965). Properz, Gedichte, lateinisch und deutsch von R. Helm. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112572924

Richardson, L.N.Jr. (1977). Propertius, Elegies I–IV. Edited with introduction and commentary by L. Richardson, Jr. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Google Scholar

Rothstein, M. (1898). Die Elegien des Sextus Propertius. Erklärt von Max Rothstein, 1. Teil: Erstes und zweites Buch. Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung (2Berlin 1920).
Google Scholar

Babnis, T. (2017). „Augustan poets on the Roman-Parthian treaty of 20 BC”. Classica Cracoviensia 20. 5–44 https://doi.org/10.12797/CC.20.2017.20.01
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.12797/CC.20.2017.20.01

Babnis, T. (2018). „Sive aliquid Augustus parcet Eois. Wschodnia polityka Rzymu w poezji Propercjusza”.
Google Scholar

Roczniki Humanistyczne 66, z. 3. 9–26 https://doi.org/10.18290/rh.2018.66.3-1
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18290/rh.2018.66.3-1

Benediktson, D.Th. (1982). Studies in the Use of Mythology by the Roman Elegists. Diss. Austin: University of Texas.
Google Scholar

Benediktson, D.Th. (1986). Catullus 58B defended. Mnemosyne Fourth Series 39. 305–312 https://doi.org/10.1163/156852586X00455
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156852586X00455

Bobrowski, A. (1997). Mitologia w rzymskiej elegii i liryce miłosnej okresu augustowskiego. Kraków: Księgarnia Akademicka.
Google Scholar

Butrica, J.L. (1984). The Manuscript Tradition of Propertius. Toronto–Buffalo–London: University of Toronto Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442632776

Cairns, F. (1971). „Propertius, 2.30 A and B”. The Classical Quarterly. 21. 204–213 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838800028950
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838800028950

Cairns, F. (2006). Sextus Propertius. The Augustan elegist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Camps, W.A. (1964) „Propertiana”. The Classical Review 14. 6–9 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009840X00217903
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009840X00217903

Camps, W.A. (1979). „L. Richardson, Jr., Propertius, Elegies I–IV” [Review]. The Classical Review NS 29. 37–39 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009840X00230254
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009840X00230254

Commager, S. (1974). A Prolegomenon to Propertius. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Google Scholar

Kocur, M. (2005). We władzy teatru. Aktorzy i widzowie w antycznym Rzymie. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.
Google Scholar

La Penna, A. (1977). L’integrazione difficile. Un profilo di Properzio. Torino: Giulio Einaudi editore.
Google Scholar

Landels, J.G. (2003). Muzyka starożytnej Grecji i Rzymu, przeł. M. Kaziński. Kraków: Homini (I wyd. ang.: Music in Ancient Greece and Rome. London 1999: Routledge).
Google Scholar

Lefèvre, E. (1966). Propertius ludibundus. Elemente des Humors in seinen Elegien. Heidelberg: Winter.
Google Scholar

Lieberg, G. (1969). Die Mythologie des Properz in der Forschung und Idealisierung Cynthias. Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 112. 311–347.
Google Scholar

Luck, G. (1962). Beiträge zum Text der Römischen Elegiker. Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 105. 337–351.
Google Scholar

Lyne, R.O.A.M. (1979). „Servitium Amoris”. The Classical Quarterly 29. 117–130 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838800035229
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838800035229

MacKay, L.A. (1937). „Propertius II, 30 Quo fugis a demens”. The Classical Journal 33. 163–164.
Google Scholar

Maltby, R. (2006). Major Themes and Motifs in Propertius’ Love Poetry. W: Günther, H.-Ch. (red.). Brill’s Companion to Propertius. Leiden–Boston: Brill. 147–181.
Google Scholar

Murgia, Ch.E. (2000). The Division of Propertius 2. Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 45. 147–242 https://doi.org/10.2307/40236186
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/40236186

Nilsson, N.-O. (1947). „Zur Erklärung von Properz II 30”. Eranos 45. 37–58.
Google Scholar

Reinhard, T. (2006). Propertius and Rhetoric. W: Günther, H.-Ch. (red.). Brill’s Companion to Propertius. Leiden–Boston: Brill. 199–216 https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047404835_012
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047404835_010

Syndikus, H.P. (2006). The Second Book. W: Günther, H.-Ch. (red.). Brill’s Companion to Propertius. Leiden–Boston: Brill. 245–318 https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047404835_012
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047404835_012

Whitaker, R. (1983). Myth and Personal Experience in Roman Love Elegy. A Study in Poetic Technique. Göttingen 1983: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666251740
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666251740

Williams, G. (1980). Figures of Thought in Roman Poetry. New Haven–London: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar

Pobrania

Opublikowane

2021-12-28

Jak cytować

Bobrowski, A. (2021). Miłość i poezja w Elegii 2.30 Sekstusa Propercjusza. Collectanea Philologica, (24), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-0319.24.04

Numer

Nr 24 (2021): Ad fontes. Tradycja antyczna i jej recepcja

Dział

Articles

Licencja

Creative Commons License

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC