Virgilian Reception in the “Sulpiciae Conquestio”

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-0319.28.09

Keywords:

Virgil, Sulpiciae Conquestio, Epigrammata Bobiensia, Augustus, Intertexuality

Abstract

The Sulpiciae Conquestio that has been transmitted as part of the Epigrammata Bobiensia is a curious work, one that is replete with intertextual allusions to Virgil’s Aeneid in particular. Close examination of the course of its argument will reveal that its author offers reflections on Virgil’s depiction of the place of war and peace in Roman history, with emphasis on the point that peace can be enervating and corrosive to the Roman polity. The Conquestio thus stands forth as a late Flavian Age commentary on the problems that may result from such seemingly successful initiatives as the implementation of the Pax Augusta.

Author Biography

  • Lee Fratantuono, National University of Ireland-Maynooth

    Prof. Lee Fratantuono – classical philologist and ancient historian, with degrees in classics from Fordham, Boston College, and Holy Cross. He is the author of some twenty books and hundred articles on Greek and Latin studies, especially Augustan poetry and Roman imperial history. 

References

Astin, A. (1978). Cato the Censor. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Baehrens, E. (1879). Poetae Latini Minores. Vol. V. Leipzig: Teubner.

Baldry, H. (1952). Who Invented the Golden Age?. The Classical Quarterly 2. 83–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838800007667

Ballaira, G. (1975). A proposito della Sulpiciae Conquestio (Epigr. Bob. 37). Rivista di Filologia e di Istruzione Classica 103. 399–402.

Ballanti, A. (1954). Documenti sull’opposizione degli intellettuali a Domiziano. Annali della Facoltà de Letttere e Filosofia dell’Università di Napoli 4. 75–95.

Boas, H. (1938). Aeneas’ Arrival in Latium. Amsterdam: Noord-Hollandsche Uitgevers.

Butrica, J. (2000). Sulpicia’s Complaint: on the State of the Nation and the Age of Domitian, Introduction (n.p.), curculio.org/Sulpiciae.

Butrica, J. (2006). The Fabella of Sulpicia (Epigrammata Bobiensia 37). Phoenix 60. 70–121.

Campbell, G. (2003). Lucretius on Creation and Evolution: A Commentary on De Rerum Natura, Book Five, Lines 772-1104. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Charles, M., Anagnostou-Laoutides, E. (2010). The Sexual Hypocrisy of Domitian (Suet., Dom. 8,3). L’Antiquité Classique 79. 173–187. https://doi.org/10.3406/antiq.2010.3772 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/antiq.2010.3988

Conway, R. (1935). P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Primus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cooley, A. (2016). Italy during the High Empire, from the Flavians to Diocletian. In: A. Cooley, (ed.). A Companion to Roman Italy. Malden, Massachusetts: Wiley-Blackwell. 121–132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118993125.ch7

Dewald, C., Munson, R. (2022). Herodotus: Histories Book 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Epigrammata Bobiensia (1963). W. Speyer (ed.). Leipzig: Teubner.

Ferguson, J. (1975). Utopias of the Classical World. London: Thames & Hudson.

Fratantuono, L. (n.d.). Why Does Virgil’s Victorious Venus Vanish?. Hermathena. Forthcoming.

Fratantuono, L. (2010). Nivales Socii: Caesar, Mamurra, and the Snow of Catullus c. 57. Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica 96. 101–110.

Galimberti, A. (2016). The Emperor Domitian. In: A. Zissos (ed.). A Companion to the Flavian Age of Imperial Rome. Malden, Massachusetts: Wiley-Blackwell. 92–108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118878149.ch5

Garani, M. (2022). Keep Up the Good Work: (Don’t) Do It like Ovid (Sen. QNat. 3.27-30). In: K. Volk, G.D. Willliams (eds.). Philosophy in Ovid, Ovid as Philosopher. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 145–163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197610336.003.0008

Gardner, H. (2023). Elegiac Revaluations of the Golden Age: Saturn’s Exile in Vergil and Tibullus. In: A. Keith, M.Y. Myers (eds.). Vergil and Elegy. Toronto: The University of Toronto Press. 63–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781487547998-006

Grainger, G. (2004). Nerva and the Roman Succession Crisis of AD 96–99. London–New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203218075

Green, C. (2007). Roman Religion and the Cult of Diana at Aricia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hockings, T. (2021). A Reward for Your Toil: Textual Notes on ‘Sulpicia’ (Epigr. Bob. 37). Mnemosyne 74. 878–887. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568525X-bja10103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/1568525X-bja10103

Horatius (2008). Opera. D. Shackleton Bailey (ed.). Berlin–New York: Walter de Gruyter.

Horsfall, N. (2013). Virgil, Aeneid . A Commentary. Vol. 2: Commentary and Appendices. Berlin–Boston: Walter de Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110229912

Jędrzejczak, D. (2009). Sulpicia as a Woman-Singer. Latomus 68. 693–695. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.2010.00354.x

Jones, B. (1993). The Emperor Domitian. London–New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203300916

Jones, B. (2011). Suetonius: Domitian. London: Bristol Classical Press.

Kerrigan, C. (2020). Virgil’s Map: Geography, Empire, and the Georgics. London: Bloomsbury Academic. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350151536

Kuijper, D. (1965). Tertius Cato – Trabe Prolapsus. Mnemosyne 18. 155–180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156852565X00151

Levick, B. (1982). Domitian and the Provinces. Latomus 41. 50–73.

Littlewood, R. (2006). A Commentary on Ovid, Fasti, Book 6. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Luke, T. (2014). Ushering in a New Republic: Theologies of Arrival at Rome in the First Century B.C.E. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.6265337

Lyne, R. (1987). Further Voices in Vergil’s Aeneid. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Macara Francis, C. (2007). Martial Epigrammata, Book X: A Commentary. Doctoral Thesis, Otago.

Merriam, C. (1991). The Other Sulpicia. The Classical World 84. 303–305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4350812

Oakley, S. (1998). A Commentary on Livy, Books VI–X. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Parker, H. (1992). Other Remarks on the Other Sulpicia. The Classical World 86. 89–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4351255

Perkell, C. (2002). The Golden Age and Its Contradictions in the Poetry of Vergil. Vergilius 48. 3–39.

Pontiggia, L. (2021). The Return of Jupiter: Aeneid 1, Punica 1, and Silius’ Post-Lucanian Theology. In: R. Marks, M. Mogetta (eds.). Domitian’s Rome and the Augustan Legacy. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. 158–170.

Richlin, A. (1992). Sulpicia the Satirist. The Classical World 86. 125–140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4351257

Rossi, A. (2004). Contexts of War: Manipulation of Genre in Virgilian Battle Narrative. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.17687

Sherwin-White, A. (1966). The Letters of Pliny: a Historical and Social Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Straub, C. (2019). Revisiting the Acorn-Eater: The Case of the Arkadians in Greek Antiquity. In: M. McWilliams (2020). Seeds: Proceedings of the Oxford Symposium on Food and Cookery 2018. London: Prospect Books.

Thiele, G. (1916). Die Poesie unter Domitian. Hermes 51. 223–260.

Traina, A. (2017). Virgilio: l’utopia e la storia: Il libro XII dell’Eneide e antologia dell’opere. Bologna: Pátron Editore. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.29487153

Vergilius (2019). Opera. G. Conte (ed.). Berlin–New York: Walter de Gruyter.

Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1982). The Golden Age and Sin in Augustan Ideology. Past & Present 95. 19–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/past/95.1.19

Zetzel, J. (1989). Romane Memento: Justice and Judgment in Aeneid 6. Transactions of the American Philological Association 119. 263–284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/284275

Downloads

Published

2025-10-30

How to Cite

Fratantuono, Lee. 2025. “Virgilian Reception in the ‘Sulpiciae Conquestio’”. Collectanea Philologica, no. 28 (October): 121-37. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-0319.28.09.