Sugestywność etycznego przekazu prologów w poemacie Lukrecjusza
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-0319.22.05Słowa kluczowe:
Lucretius, Epicurean ethics, De rerum natura, Epicurean valuesAbstrakt
Lucretius, considered to be the continuator of Epicure, is the author of the poem De rerum natura. Essentially, this title suggests that it is a work that addresses the problems of ancient physics, in this case the materialistic concept of reality. Of course, this is true, but besides the physical doctrine, the poem also contains numerous sections on ethics and morality. Although no part of De rerum natura is a constant ethical argument, the whole text is permeated with information that serves precisely this purpose. The aim of this article is to show how the poet uses in his prologues for subsequent books of the poem the structure, content and various stylistic and rhetorical elements to convince the reader of the rightness and values of the explicitly and implicitly demonstrated ethical views he proclaims.
Bibliografia
Asmis, E. (1983). „Rhetoric and Reason in Lucretius”. The American Journal of Philology 104 (1), 36–66.
Google Scholar
Bailey, C. (1928). The Greek Atomists and Epicurus. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Google Scholar
Boyancé, P. (1963). Lucrèce et l’épicurisme. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1987). Lucretius on Love and Sex. Leiden: Brill.
Google Scholar
Brown, R.D. (1987). Lucretius on Love and Sex: A Commentary on De Rerum Natura IV, 1030– 1287. Leiden: Brill.
Google Scholar
Campbell, G. (2002). „Lucretius and the Memes of Prehistory”. Leeds International Classical Studies Discussion Paper 1, 1–32.
Google Scholar
Campbell, G. (2003). Lucretius on Creation and Evolution: A Commentary on De rerum natura 5.772-1104. Oxford–New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Castagna, L. (2000). „Vecchiaia e morte del mondo in Lucrezio, Seneca e San Cipriano”. Aevum Antiquum 13, 239–263.
Google Scholar
Cox, W. (1986). Didactic Poetry: Lucretius, [w:] J. Classen, Probleme der Lukrezforschung. Hildesheim: Olms. 221–230.
Google Scholar
Dudley, D.R. (1967). Lucretius. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Google Scholar
Farrington, B. (1967). Form and Purpose in the De rerum natura, [w:] J. Classen, Probleme der Lukrezforschung. Hildesheim: Olms. 221–230.
Google Scholar
Foster, E. (2009). „The Rhetoric of Materials: Thucydides and Lucretius”. The American Journal of Philology 130 (3), 367–399.
Google Scholar
Furley, D.J. (1970). „Variations on themes from Empedocles in Lucretius’s Proem”. BICS 17, 55–64.
Google Scholar
Gain, D.B. (1969). „The Life and Death of Lucretius”. Latomus 28 (3), 545–553.
Google Scholar
Gale, M. (1994). Myth and Poetry in Lucretius. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Gale, M. (2001). Etymological Wordplay and Poetic Succession in Lucretius. CPh 96 (2), 168–172.
Google Scholar
Gale, M. (2001). Lucretius and the Didactic Epic. London: Bristol Hackett.
Google Scholar
Gellar, T. (2012). Lucretius’ De rerum natura and satire. Doctoral dissertation.
Google Scholar
Gellar-Goad, T.H.M. (2018). „Lucretius’ Personified Natura Rerum, Satire, and Ennius’ Saturae”. Phoenix 72 (1/2), 143–160.
Google Scholar
Giancotti, F. (1959). Il preludio di Tito Lucrezio Caro. Messina: D’Anna.
Google Scholar
Grzelak-Krzymianowska, A. (2006). „Czy dobro najwyższe Lukrecjusza ma charakter racjonalny?”. Collectanea Philologica IX, 73–77.
Google Scholar
Grzelak-Krzymianowska, A. (2013). „The Presence of Ethical Teaching in the De Rerum Natura of Lucretius”. Collectanea Philologica XVI, 103–113.
Google Scholar
Harrison, J.R. (2002). „Ennius and the Prologue to Lcuretius DRN 1. 1–148”.
Google Scholar
Holmes, B. (2014). „The poetics of anthropogony: men, women, and children in Lucretius, book five”. EuGeStA 4, 135–174.
Google Scholar
Ingalls, W.B. (1971). „Repetition in Lucretius”. Phoenix 25 (3), 227–236.
Google Scholar
Jope, J. (1983). „Lucretius’ psychoanalytic insight: his notion of unconscious motivation”. Phoenix 37 (3), 224–238
Google Scholar
Korolko, M. (1990). Sztuka retoryki. Przewodnik encyklopedyczny. Warszawa: Wiedza Powszechna.
Google Scholar
Krukowska, S. (2013). „Motywy mitologiczne w poemacie Lukrecjusz De rerum natura”. Classica Wratislaviensia II (XXXIII), 5–20.
Google Scholar
Kyriakidis, S. (2009). Catalogues of Proper Names in Latin Epic Poetry: Lucretius – Virgil – Ovid. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Google Scholar
Lausberg, H. (2002). Retoryka literacka. Przeł. A. Gorzkowski. Homini. Leeds International Classical studies 1 (4), 1–13.
Google Scholar
Lévi, N. (2008). „Le De Rerum Natura de Lucrèce, ou la subversion épicurienne de la révélation pythagoricienne des Annales d’Ennius”. Revue de philologie, de littérature et d’histoire anciennes XXXII (1), 113–132.
Google Scholar
Lichański, J. (1996). Co to jest retoryka? Kraków: Ossolineum.
Google Scholar
Maguinnes, W.S. (1967). The Language of Lucretius, [w:] J. Dudley, Lucretius. London.
Google Scholar
McConnell, S. (2018). „Lucretius on the nature of parental love”. Antichthon 52, 72–89.
Google Scholar
Mitosek, Z. (1953). Teorie badań literackich. Przegląd historyczny. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
Google Scholar
Morselli, F. (1892). Il pessimismo di Tito L. Caro. Torino–Palermo: C. Clausen.
Google Scholar
Murley, C. (1947). „Lucretius, De Rerum Natura, Viewed as Epic”. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 78, 336–346.
Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (1994). The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar
O’Keefe, T. (w przygotowaniu) Lucretius and the Philosophical Use of Literary Persuasion, [w:] Donncha O’Rourke (red.). Approaches to Lucretius: traditions and innovations in reading De Rerum Natura. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (https://www.academia.edu/37176504/Lucretius_and_the_philosophical_use_of_literary_persuasion, data dostępu: 6.11.2019).
Google Scholar
Pawlaczyk, A. (1997). „Sposoby i formy perswazji w poemacie Lukrecjusza”. Meander 3 (97), 205–217.
Google Scholar
Phillips, J.H. (1982). „Lucretius on the Inefficacy of the Medical Art: 6. 1179 and 6. 1226-38”. Classical Philology 77 (3), 233–235.
Google Scholar
Platon (1999). Gorgiasz. Przeł. Wł. Witwicki. Kęty.
Google Scholar
Rider B.A. (2014). „Epicurus on the Fear of Deathand the Relative Value of Lives”. Apeiron. 1–24.
Google Scholar
Schrijvers, P.H. (1970). Horror ac divina voluptas: etudes sur la poétique et la poésie de Lucrèce. Amsterdam: Adolf M. Hakkert.
Google Scholar
Snyder, J.M., (1980). Puns and Poetry in Lucretius’ „De rerum natura”. Amsterdam: B.R. Grüner.
Google Scholar
Teofrast (1963). Pisma filozoficzne i wybrane pisma przyrodnicze. Przeł. D. Gromska, J. Schnayder. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
Google Scholar
TitiLucretiCari (1963). De rerum natura libri sex. B.G. Teubner (red.). Lipsiae.
Google Scholar
Townend, G. (1967). Imagery in Lucretius, [w:] D.R. Dudley, Lucretius. London. 95–114.
Google Scholar
Trzy stylistyki greckie (1953). Przeł. W. Madyda. Wrocław: Ossolineum.
Google Scholar
Tytus Lukrecjusz Karus. (1958). O rzeczywistości ksiąg sześć. Przeł. A. Krokiewicz. Wrocław: Ossolineum.
Google Scholar
Wesoły, M. (1970). Poemat Lukrecjusza „De rerum natura” jako próba naukowej interpretacji zjawisk. Poznań (praca magisterska w maszynopisie, Instytut Filologii Klasycznej UAM).
Google Scholar
West, D. (1969). The Imagery and Poetry in Lucretius. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Google Scholar
Wigodsky, M. (1974). „A Pattern of Argument in Lucretius”. Pacific Coast Philology 9, 73–78.
Google Scholar
Wormell, D.E. (1967). The Personal World of Lucretius, [w:] D.R. Dudley, Lucretius. London. 38–49.
Google Scholar
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
