Sugestywność etycznego przekazu prologów w poemacie Lukrecjusza

Autor

  • Adriana Grzelak-Krzymianowska Uniwersytet Łódzki

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-0319.22.05

Słowa kluczowe:

Lucretius, Epicurean ethics, De rerum natura, Epicurean values

Abstrakt

Lucretius, considered to be the continuator of Epicure, is the author of the poem De rerum natura. Essentially, this title suggests that it is a work that addresses the problems of ancient phy­sics, in this case the materialistic concept of reality. Of course, this is true, but besides the physical doctrine, the poem also contains numerous sections on ethics and morality. Although no part of De rerum natura is a constant ethical argument, the whole text is permeated with information that serves precisely this purpose. The aim of this article is to show how the poet uses in his prologues for subsequent books of the poem the structure, content and various stylistic and rhetorical elements to convince the reader of the rightness and values of the explicitly and implicitly demonstrated ethical views he proclaims.

Biogram autora

Adriana Grzelak-Krzymianowska - Uniwersytet Łódzki

dr Adriana Grzelak-Krzymianowska (Uniwersytet Łódzki) – is a resear­cher at the Department of Classical Philology at the University of Lodz. In 2002 graduated from the faculty of Classical Studies at the University of Lodz on the basis of thesis on Lucretian anthropology. In 2012 obtained her Ph.D. with her dissertation on Lucretian ethics. Author of articles in Polish, English, Latin and Italian. Organiser of the conference: Rome and Iberia. Diversity of Relations from Antiquity to Modernity. Scientific interests: Epicurean philosophy in Rome, travel and resorts of ancient Rome, Medical Latin.

Bibliografia

Asmis, E. (1983). „Rhetoric and Reason in Lucretius”. The American Journal of Philology 104 (1), 36–66.
Google Scholar

Bailey, C. (1928). The Greek Atomists and Epicurus. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Google Scholar

Boyancé, P. (1963). Lucrèce et l’épicurisme. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Google Scholar

Brown, R. (1987). Lucretius on Love and Sex. Leiden: Brill.
Google Scholar

Brown, R.D. (1987). Lucretius on Love and Sex: A Commentary on De Rerum Natura IV, 1030– 1287. Leiden: Brill.
Google Scholar

Campbell, G. (2002). „Lucretius and the Memes of Prehistory”. Leeds International Classical Studies Discussion Paper 1, 1–32.
Google Scholar

Campbell, G. (2003). Lucretius on Creation and Evolution: A Commentary on De rerum natura 5.772-1104. Oxford–New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Castagna, L. (2000). „Vecchiaia e morte del mondo in Lucrezio, Seneca e San Cipriano”. Aevum Antiquum 13, 239–263.
Google Scholar

Cox, W. (1986). Didactic Poetry: Lucretius, [w:] J. Classen, Probleme der Lukrezforschung. Hildesheim: Olms. 221–230.
Google Scholar

Dudley, D.R. (1967). Lucretius. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Google Scholar

Farrington, B. (1967). Form and Purpose in the De rerum natura, [w:] J. Classen, Probleme der Lukrezforschung. Hildesheim: Olms. 221–230.
Google Scholar

Foster, E. (2009). „The Rhetoric of Materials: Thucydides and Lucretius”. The American Journal of Philology 130 (3), 367–399.
Google Scholar

Furley, D.J. (1970). „Variations on themes from Empedocles in Lucretius’s Proem”. BICS 17, 55–64.
Google Scholar

Gain, D.B. (1969). „The Life and Death of Lucretius”. Latomus 28 (3), 545–553.
Google Scholar

Gale, M. (1994). Myth and Poetry in Lucretius. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Gale, M. (2001). Etymological Wordplay and Poetic Succession in Lucretius. CPh 96 (2), 168–172.
Google Scholar

Gale, M. (2001). Lucretius and the Didactic Epic. London: Bristol Hackett.
Google Scholar

Gellar, T. (2012). Lucretius’ De rerum natura and satire. Doctoral dissertation.
Google Scholar

Gellar-Goad, T.H.M. (2018). „Lucretius’ Personified Natura Rerum, Satire, and Ennius’ Saturae”. Phoenix 72 (1/2), 143–160.
Google Scholar

Giancotti, F. (1959). Il preludio di Tito Lucrezio Caro. Messina: D’Anna.
Google Scholar

Grzelak-Krzymianowska, A. (2006). „Czy dobro najwyższe Lukrecjusza ma charakter racjonalny?”. Collectanea Philologica IX, 73–77.
Google Scholar

Grzelak-Krzymianowska, A. (2013). „The Presence of Ethical Teaching in the De Rerum Natura of Lucretius”. Collectanea Philologica XVI, 103–113.
Google Scholar

Harrison, J.R. (2002). „Ennius and the Prologue to Lcuretius DRN 1. 1–148”.
Google Scholar

Holmes, B. (2014). „The poetics of anthropogony: men, women, and children in Lucretius, book five”. EuGeStA 4, 135–174.
Google Scholar

Ingalls, W.B. (1971). „Repetition in Lucretius”. Phoenix 25 (3), 227–236.
Google Scholar

Jope, J. (1983). „Lucretius’ psychoanalytic insight: his notion of unconscious motivation”. Phoenix 37 (3), 224–238
Google Scholar

Korolko, M. (1990). Sztuka retoryki. Przewodnik encyklopedyczny. Warszawa: Wiedza Powszechna.
Google Scholar

Krukowska, S. (2013). „Motywy mitologiczne w poemacie Lukrecjusz De rerum natura”. Classica Wratislaviensia II (XXXIII), 5–20.
Google Scholar

Kyriakidis, S. (2009). Catalogues of Proper Names in Latin Epic Poetry: Lucretius – Virgil – Ovid. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Google Scholar

Lausberg, H. (2002). Retoryka literacka. Przeł. A. Gorzkowski. Homini. Leeds International Classical studies 1 (4), 1–13.
Google Scholar

Lévi, N. (2008). „Le De Rerum Natura de Lucrèce, ou la subversion épicurienne de la révélation pythagoricienne des Annales d’Ennius”. Revue de philologie, de littérature et d’histoire anciennes XXXII (1), 113–132.
Google Scholar

Lichański, J. (1996). Co to jest retoryka? Kraków: Ossolineum.
Google Scholar

Maguinnes, W.S. (1967). The Language of Lucretius, [w:] J. Dudley, Lucretius. London.
Google Scholar

McConnell, S. (2018). „Lucretius on the nature of parental love”. Antichthon 52, 72–89.
Google Scholar

Mitosek, Z. (1953). Teorie badań literackich. Przegląd historyczny. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
Google Scholar

Morselli, F. (1892). Il pessimismo di Tito L. Caro. Torino–Palermo: C. Clausen.
Google Scholar

Murley, C. (1947). „Lucretius, De Rerum Natura, Viewed as Epic”. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 78, 336–346.
Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. (1994). The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar

O’Keefe, T. (w przygotowaniu) Lucretius and the Philosophical Use of Literary Persuasion, [w:] Donncha O’Rourke (red.). Approaches to Lucretius: traditions and innovations in reading De Rerum Natura. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (https://www.academia.edu/37176504/Lucretius_and_the_philosophical_use_of_literary_persuasion, data dostępu: 6.11.2019).
Google Scholar

Pawlaczyk, A. (1997). „Sposoby i formy perswazji w poemacie Lukrecjusza”. Meander 3 (97), 205–217.
Google Scholar

Phillips, J.H. (1982). „Lucretius on the Inefficacy of the Medical Art: 6. 1179 and 6. 1226-38”. Classical Philology 77 (3), 233–235.
Google Scholar

Platon (1999). Gorgiasz. Przeł. Wł. Witwicki. Kęty.
Google Scholar

Rider B.A. (2014). „Epicurus on the Fear of Deathand the Relative Value of Lives”. Apeiron. 1–24.
Google Scholar

Schrijvers, P.H. (1970). Horror ac divina voluptas: etudes sur la poétique et la poésie de Lucrèce. Amsterdam: Adolf M. Hakkert.
Google Scholar

Snyder, J.M., (1980). Puns and Poetry in Lucretius’ „De rerum natura”. Amsterdam: B.R. Grüner.
Google Scholar

Teofrast (1963). Pisma filozoficzne i wybrane pisma przyrodnicze. Przeł. D. Gromska, J. Schnayder. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
Google Scholar

TitiLucretiCari (1963). De rerum natura libri sex. B.G. Teubner (red.). Lipsiae.
Google Scholar

Townend, G. (1967). Imagery in Lucretius, [w:] D.R. Dudley, Lucretius. London. 95–114.
Google Scholar

Trzy stylistyki greckie (1953). Przeł. W. Madyda. Wrocław: Ossolineum.
Google Scholar

Tytus Lukrecjusz Karus. (1958). O rzeczywistości ksiąg sześć. Przeł. A. Krokiewicz. Wrocław: Ossolineum.
Google Scholar

Wesoły, M. (1970). Poemat Lukrecjusza „De rerum natura” jako próba naukowej interpretacji zjawisk. Poznań (praca magisterska w maszynopisie, Instytut Filologii Klasycznej UAM).
Google Scholar

West, D. (1969). The Imagery and Poetry in Lucretius. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Google Scholar

Wigodsky, M. (1974). „A Pattern of Argument in Lucretius”. Pacific Coast Philology 9, 73–78.
Google Scholar

Wormell, D.E. (1967). The Personal World of Lucretius, [w:] D.R. Dudley, Lucretius. London. 38–49.
Google Scholar

Pobrania

Opublikowane

2019-12-30

Jak cytować

Grzelak-Krzymianowska, A. (2019). Sugestywność etycznego przekazu prologów w poemacie Lukrecjusza. Collectanea Philologica, (22), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-0319.22.05

Numer

Dział

Articles