Z badań nad pojęciem pamięci – mneme w dramacie greckim. Część I: Mneme w utworach Ajschylosa i Sofoklesa

Autor

  • Krzysztof Narecki Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, Katedra Filologii Greckiej, Instytut Filologii Klasycznej, Al. Racławickie 14, 20-950 Lublin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-0319.21.01

Słowa kluczowe:

mneme – memory, semantics, ancient Greek tragedy, Aeschylus, Sophocles

Abstrakt

The aim of the study, which is a continuation of this type of research (based on Greek literary sources of the Presocratic era), is to determine the meanings of the concept of mneme – “memory” in the works of Aeschylus and Sophocles, as well as to determine the function it plays in a given place. Linguistic and literary analysis of 12 instances of a noun mneme in Aeschylus (3) and Sophocles (9) shows that this concept reveals hitherto unknown semantic shades. Aeschylus gives mneme a new meaning of “worship” (in Suppliants). He also uses the already known: intellectual “power of mem­ory” and for the first time in the history of Greek literature identifies “memory” with the mother of all muses – Mnemosyne (in Prometheus Bound). More often mneme appears in the works of Sopho­cles, which results from the functions performed there. After all, the intellectual “power of memory” and “memories” as the effects of its actions allow the characters to: (1) do well (and thus keep the moral order), (2) get to know the truth about ourselves (to recognize our own identity) changing the course of dramatic action as part of the peripeteia (the case of Oedipus), (3) lead (as the driving force) to destruction of heroes (Jocasta, Oedipus), (4) drive the action (as “thought”), (5) serve as a moral compass (in a new semantic shade “attention”, in Oedipus at Colonuss), (6) store a resource (memories) as a deposit in collective memory as a warning for posterity. And finally, for the first time in history, the concept of mneme as a tool of mimesis is used in Oedipus Rex in the new sense: “the ability to (re)create” (inspired by Mnemosyne) or otherwise: “poetic art of reconstruction” of dramatic events. Defined meanings (semantic shades) of mneme can be divided into 2 groups. The first group includes those that take rational value: “power / ability to remember”, “thought”, “attention”), while the other holds the expressive meanings: “worship, honour, commemoration”, “(re)creative, poetic reconstruction”. It seems that the Greek tragedians were aware of the role that mneme can play in their works: whether in the depiction of the characters, or as an element that drives the action, or in recalling, in various ways, the past and its cultivation.

Biogram autora

Krzysztof Narecki - Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, Katedra Filologii Greckiej, Instytut Filologii Klasycznej, Al. Racławickie 14, 20-950 Lublin

He works at the Institute of Classical Studies as a professor of KUL, running the Department of Greek Philology from 2011. In 2013 he edited volume 9 of “Annals of Arts”, “Sinology”, and he is its editor-in-chief. He is a member of The Committee on Ancient Culture of the Polish Academy of Sciences (PAN), The Polish Philological Society, The Lublin Branch of the Polish Academy of Sciences, The Learned Society of the John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin. His scientific interests are focused on the Greek thought and philosophical terminology (espe­cially Presocratics, Aristotle). Author of many publications devoted to Heraclitus of Ephesus, Parmenides, Empedocles and Aristotle. Part of his achievements con­cerns selected issues of the language, literature, culture, philosophy and religion of ancient Greece, including the entries in the Encyklopedia Katolicka (Catholic Encyclopedia) and Powszechna Encyklopedia Filozofii (the Universal Encyclo­pedia of Philosophy). In 2016 he was awarded by the President of the Republic of Poland with the Bronze Cross of Merit – for merits in activities for the development of science.

Bibliografia

Aeschylus (1983). Prometheus Bound. Ed. by M. Griffith. Cambridge Greek and Latin Classics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Aeschylus (2009). Oresteia: Agamemnon. Libation-Bearers. Eumenides. Ed. and trans. by Alan H. Sommerstein. Loeb Classical Library 146. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar

Aeschylus (2009a). Persians. Seven against Thebes. Suppliants. Prometheus Bound. Ed. and trans. by Alan H. Sommerstein. Loeb Classical Library 145. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar

Ajschylos (2005). Tragedie. Przełożył i opracował Stefan Srebrny. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Homini.
Google Scholar

Ajschylos (2015). Tragedie. T. 1: Persowie. Siedmiu przeciw Tebom. Błagalnice. Prometeusz w okowach. Przełożył, wstępem i przypisami opatrzył Robert R. Chodkowski. Lublin: Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL.
Google Scholar

Ajschylos (2016). Tragedie. T. 2: Oresteja: Agamemnon. Ofiarnice. Boginie łaskawe. Przełożył, wstępem i przypisami opatrzył Robert R. Chodkowski. Lublin: Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL.
Google Scholar

Bekker, I. (1814). Anecdota Graeca. Vol. 1. Berolini: apud G. C. Nauckium.
Google Scholar

Claverhouse Jebb, R., Headlam, W.G., Pearson, A.C. (eds.) (2009). The Fragments of Sophocles. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [1st Ed. 1917].
Google Scholar

Diels-Kranz (I/II) = Diels, H., Kranz, W. (1956). Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Griechisch und deutsch von Hermann Diels. Achte Aufl. hrsg. von Walther Kranz. Bd. I-II. Berlin: Weidmann­sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.
Google Scholar

Dindorfius, G. (1870). Lexicon Sophocleum. Lipsiae: in aedibus B. G. Teubneri.
Google Scholar

Dindorfius, G. (1876). Lexicon Aeschyleum. Lipsiae: in aedibus B. G. Teubneri.
Google Scholar

Ellendt, F. (1872). Lexicon Sophocleum. Adhibitis veterum interpretum explicationibus, grammaticorum notationibus, recentiorum doctorum commentariis, composuit […]. Editio altera emen­data curavit Hermannus Genthe. Berolini: sumptibus Fratrum Borntraeger.
Google Scholar

Grimal, P. (1987). Słownik mitologii greckiej i rzymskiej. Wrocław: Ossolineum.
Google Scholar

Hezjod (1999). Narodziny bogów (Theogonia). Prace i dni. Tarcza. Przełożył, wstępem i przypisami opatrzył Jerzy Łanowski. Warszawa: Prószyński i S-ka.
Google Scholar

Kamerbeek, J.C. (1963). The Plays of Sophocles. Commentaries. Part I: The Ajax. Leiden: Brill.
Google Scholar

Kamerbeek, J.C. (1967). The Plays of Sophocles. Commentaries. Part IV: The Oedipus Tyrannus. Leiden: Brill.
Google Scholar

Kamerbeek, J.C. (1974). The Plays of Sophocles. Commentaries. Part V: The Electra. Leiden: Brill.
Google Scholar

Kamerbeek, J.C. (1984). The Plays of Sophocles. Commentaries. Part VII: The Oedipus Coloneus. Leiden: Brill.
Google Scholar

Linwood, W. (1843). A Lexicon to Aeschylus. Containing a Critical Explanation of the More Diffi­cult Passages in the Seven Tragedies. London: Taylor and Walton.
Google Scholar

Lloyd-Jones, H. (1992). „Helikaon (Sophokles, fr. 10e, 8; fr. 210, 47–53)“. Zeitschrift für Papyrolo­gie und Epigraphik, 92, 55–58.
Google Scholar

LSJ = Liddell, H.G., Scott, R., Jones, H.S., McKenzie, R. (1996). A Greek-English Lexicon. A new ninth Edition revised and augmented by H. S. Jones. With the assistance of R. McKenzie. Sup­plement. Ed. by P. G. W. Glare. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Google Scholar

Maślanka-Soro, M. (2005). Sofokles i jego twórczość dramatyczna, [w:] H. Podbielski (red.). Lite­ratura Grecji starożytnej. T. I: Epika – liryka – dramat. Lublin: Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL, 725–769.
Google Scholar

Montanari, F. (ed.) (2015). The Brill Dictionary of Ancient Greek. Editors of the English Edition M. Goh & Ch. Schroeder. Under the auspices of the Center for Hellenic Sudies. Advisory Edi­tors G. Nagy, L. Muellner. Leiden-Boston: Brill.
Google Scholar

Narecki, K. (2018). „Mneme w greckich źródłach literackich epoki przedsokratyków. Część I: lite­ratura archaiczna i przedsokratycy”. Roczniki Humanistyczne 66, z. 3, 207–231.
Google Scholar

Rose, H.J. (1957). A Commentary on the Surviving Plays of Aeschylus. Nieuwe Reeks. Deel LXIV. No. 1. Amsterdam: N. V. Noord-Hollandsche Uitgevers Maatschappij.
Google Scholar

Rose, H.J. (1958). A Commentary on the Surviving Plays of Aeschylus. Nieuwe Reeks. Deel LXIV. No. 2. Amsterdam: N. V. Noord-Hollandsche Uitgevers Maatschappij.
Google Scholar

Sofokles (1969). Tragedie. Przełożył Kazimierz Morawski, opracował i wstępem opatrzył Zygmunt Kubiak. Warszawa: Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy.
Google Scholar

Sofokles (2008). Trzy dramaty: Antygona. Król Edyp. Elektra. Przeł. N. Chadzinikolau. Poznań: Zysk i S-Ka.
Google Scholar

Sofokles (2009). Tragedie. T. 1: Ajas. Trachinki. Filoktet. Edyp w Kolonos. Przełożył, wstępami i przypisami opatrzył Robert R. Chodkowski. Lublin: Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL.
Google Scholar

Sofokles (2012). Tragedie. T. 2: Król Edyp. Antygona. Elektra, przełożył, wstępami i przypisami opatrzył Robert R. Chodkowski. Lublin: Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL.
Google Scholar

Sophocles (1994). Ajax. Electra. Oedipus Tyrannus. Ed. and trans. by Hugh Lloyd-Jones. Loeb Classical Library 20. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar

Sophocles (1994a). Antigone. The Women of Trachis. Philoctetes. Oedipus at Colonus. Ed. and trans. by Hugh Lloyd-Jones. Loeb Classical Library 21. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar

Sophocles (1996). Fragments. Ed. and trans. by Hugh Lloyd-Jones. Loeb Classical Library 483. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar

Sophocles (2000). Electra. Ed. by J.H. Kells. Cambridge Greek and Latin Classics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [1st Ed. 1973].
Google Scholar

Sophocles (2002). Oedipus Rex. Ed. by R.D. Dawe. Cambridge Greek and Latin Classics. Cambrid­ge, MA: Harvard University Press [1st Ed. 1982].
Google Scholar

Wellauer, A. (1831). Lexicon Aeschyleum. T. 2. Lipsiae: sumptibus Fr. Chr. Guil. Vogelii.
Google Scholar

Pobrania

Opublikowane

2018-12-30

Jak cytować

Narecki, K. (2018). Z badań nad pojęciem pamięci – mneme w dramacie greckim. Część I: Mneme w utworach Ajschylosa i Sofoklesa. Collectanea Philologica, (21), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-0319.21.01

Numer

Dział

Articles