Fraud or Poverty? Medieval Wedding Rings of Legnica Jews

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6034.40.13

Keywords:

ring, wedding, Jews, Legnica, brass

Abstract

Wedding rings have been known since antiquity. In the Roman Empire, they took the form of bands adorned with a motif of two clasped hands. In Jewish culture, the engagement (kiddushin, erusin) – during which a ring was given – and the wedding (nissu’in) were originally separate ceremonies. It was not until the early 13th century that the giving of a ring to the bride became an integral part of the wedding ritual. According to Halakha, the ring was to be made of pure gold. In practice, however, wedding rings were also made of silver, gold-plated metals, and even cheaper materials like copper. Wedding rings could take the form of ordinary rings, making them difficult to identify as archaeological artefacts. The only feature mentioned in historical sources is the engraved inscription MAZAL TOV.

MAZAL TOV not only conveyed a wish for happiness but also embodied a belief that its presence would ensure a successful union. To date, only three unquestionably medieval rings bearing this inscription are known: from Weissenfels, Colmar, and Erfurt, hoards hidden during the mid-fourteenth- century plague.

Each features a crown in the shape of a miniature building, symbolising not only the creation of a new home for the couple but also – perhaps primarily – the Temple of Solomon or the Second Temple destroyed by Titus, expressing hope for its future reconstruction.

Two Legnica rings were discovered during archaeological and architectural research conducted between 2021 and 2022 in the area bordered by Grodzka, Szpitalna, and Nowa Streets and the Galeria Piastowska building. One bears the MAZAL TOV inscription; the other has a crown in the form of Solomon’s Temple. Both are made of brass.

Jewish tradition permitted the use of silver, gold-plated, or even copper rings as symbols of marriage. However, for the marriage to be valid, the groom was required to inform the bride of the ring’s actual material. If the bride was unaware of its true value, the marriage was considered invalid.

The use of gold-imitating materials in the Legnica rings suggests they were made for poorer members of the Jewish community. However, the possibility of deliberate deception cannot be excluded. Even today, nearly 600 years later, these rings gleam with a golden hue, suggesting that they were made of precious metal.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baumgarten E. (2023), Gender and Daily Life in the Jewish Communities of Medieval Europe, [in:] C. Bakhos, G. Langer (ed.), The Jewish Middle Ages, SBL Press, Atlanta, p. 13–34, https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.1176891.6
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.1176891.6

Bolewski A., Manecki A. (1993), Mineralogia szczegółowa, Wydawnictwo PAE, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Buśko C. (2021), Badania archeologiczne przy ulicy Grodzkiej, “Szkice Legnickie”, 42, p. 496–498.
Google Scholar

Buśko C., Łaszewski W. (2022), Średniowieczna złota klamra do pasa z badań przy ulicy Grodzkiej nr 50 w Legnicy, “Szkice Legnickie”, 43, p. 129–132.
Google Scholar

Buśko C., Łaszewski W. (2023), „Netilat Yadayim”. Akwamanila z ulicy Grodzkiej jako wyraz liturgii dnia codziennego legnickich Żydów, “Szkice Legnickie”, 44, p. 109–116.
Google Scholar

Buśko C., Łaszewski W. (2024), Średniowieczne odważniki z badań przy ul. Grodzkiej w Legnicy, “Szkice Legnickie”, 45.
Google Scholar

Goliński M. (2007), Żydzi w średniowiecznej Legnicy. Problem lokalizacji w przestrzeni miejskiej, “Szkice Legnickie”, 28, p. 5–22.
Google Scholar

Łaszewski W. (2007), Tajemnice legnickiego Zamku, “Szkice Legnickie”, 28, p. 227–228.
Google Scholar

Mecking O. (2010), Die Rekonstruktion der Goldschmiedetechniken aufgrund der chemischen Analytik, [in:] Der Schatzfund. Analysen – Herstellungstechniken – Rekonstruktionen, Bd. II, Beier & Beran, Langenweißbach (Die mittelalterliche jüdische Kultur in Erfurt), p. 10–225.
Google Scholar

Sauerlandt M. (1919), Ein Schmuckfund aus Weißenfels vom Anfang des 14. Jahrhunderts, “Der Cicerone”, 11(16), p. 519–526.
Google Scholar

Siuda R., Gołębiowska B. (2011), Nowe dane o minerałach wietrzeniowych złoża Miedzianka-Ciechanowice w Rudawach Janowickich (Dolny Śląsk, Polska), “Przegląd Geologiczny”, 59.3, p. 226.
Google Scholar

Stürzebecher M. (2020), The Medieval Jewish Wedding Ring from the Erfurt Treasure: Ceremonial Object or Bride Price?, [in:] C.D. Bergmann, M. Stürzebecher (ed.), Erfurter Schriften zur Jüdischen Geschichte, Bd. VI, Ritual Objects in Ritual Contexts, Bussert & Stadeler, Jena–Quedlinburgp, p. 72–79.
Google Scholar

Stürzebecher M. (2022), Jewish Wedding Rings with Miniature Architecture from Medieval Europe, “Arts” 11, p. 131, https://doi.org/10.3390/arts11060131
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/arts11060131

Tomaszewska-Szewczyk A. (2016), Mosiądz w starożytności i średniowieczu. Przyczynek do dziejów kultury materialnej, “Acta Universitatis Nicolai Copernici. Zabytkoznawstwo i Konserwatorstwo”, 47, p. 7–41, https://doi.org/10.12775/AUNC_ZiK.2016.001
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/AUNC_ZiK.2016.001

Le Trésor de Colmar. (Ausstellungskat) (1999), Musée d‘Unterlinden, Colmar.
Google Scholar

Wiggert F. (1844), Über einen in Weißenfels im J.1826 gemachten Fund goldner und silberner Schmucksachen aus dem vierzehnten Jahrhunderte, “Neue Mitteilungen aus dem Gebiet historisch-antiquarischer Forschungen”, 7.2, p. 86–95.
Google Scholar

Wrześniak M. (2015), Dextrarum iunctio – rzecz o znaczeniu ślubnego pierścienia, “Fides et Ratio”, 24, p. 12–31.
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2025-11-19

How to Cite

Buśko, C., Łaszewski, W., & Michniewicz, J. (2025). Fraud or Poverty? Medieval Wedding Rings of Legnica Jews. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Archaeologica, (40), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6034.40.13

Issue

Section

Articles