Biosimilars in the French and Polish System: Chosen Aspects of Reimbursement and Access
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.23.15Keywords:
biosimilars, biosimilar medicines, healthcare system, reimbursement, access, EMA, Ministry of HealthAbstract
The EU approved the first biosimilar drug in 2006. By 2017, the EU had authorized the highest number of biosimilars worldwide, acquiring considerable experience in their use and safety. In May 2019, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) search engine showed 54 authorized biosimilars. Biosimilars reduce public expenditure; however, the discussion about their potential disadvantages is still ongoing. Each country adopts different regulations on the interchangeability, switching, and substitution of a reference medicine by its biosimilar, since the EMA does not regulate this issue. Additionally, each nation has a unique reimbursement system, which results in significant differences in patients’ access to biosimilars. The importance of securing a higher availability of these cheaper versions of biological drugs is well-recognized. The better the access to these biosimilars is, the lower the overall drug expenditure and need for rationing would be, and therefore the better treatment results. The aim of this paper is to compare selected aspects of reimbursement and access to the EMA authorized biosimilar medicines in two countries – France and Poland. The stated drug policy goal of both countries is to significantly improve biosimilar implementation in the coming years. The research is based on an analysis of four main sources: the EMA biosimilars database, the Polish reimbursement list published by the Polish Ministry of Health, and two French reimbursement databases published by the French Ministry of Health. An additional literature review was conducted. The expected results concentrate on differences in the number of reimbursed biosimilars, the average time between EMA authorization and country reimbursement decision date, and the availability of biosimilars registered outside of the centralized (EMA) procedure. These findings could identify areas of improvement and help with discussions on how to optimize the reach of biosimilars, as well as improve French-Polish collaboration on this matter.
Downloads
References
DemosEUROPA (2015), Leki biologiczne w polskim systemie ochrony zdrowia, DemosEUROPA – Centrum Strategii Europejskiej. Available at: https://www.infarma.pl/assets/files/innowacje/Leki_biologiczne_w_polskim_systemie_zdrowia_Raport_demosEUROPA.pdf (accessed: 2.07.2019)
Google Scholar
European Medicines Agency and the European Commission (2017), Biosimilars in the EU. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781315119878-15
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315119878-15
EY Life Sciences (2018), Global biosimilar policy comparison, EY Life Sciences, pp. 50–59. Available at: https://www.eyadvisory.co.jp/services/documents/pdf/global-biosimilar-policy-comparison-report_final.pdf (accessed: 3.07.2019)
Google Scholar
Gamez-Belmonte, R. et al. (2018) Biosimilars: Concepts and controversies, “Pharmacological Research”, Elsevier Ltd, Vol. 133, pp. 251–264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2018.01.024
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2018.01.024
Gronde, T. van der, Uyl-de Groot, C.A. and Pieters, T. (2017), Addressing the challenge of high-priced prescription drugs in the era of precision medicine: A systematic review of drug life cycles, therapeutic drug markets and regulatory frameworks, “PloS One”, http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182613
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182613
IQVIA (2018), The Impact of Biosimilar Competition in Europe. Available at: http://www.medicinesforeurope.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/IMS-Biosimilar-2017_V9.pdf (accessed: 2.07.2019).
Google Scholar
Janjigian, Y. Y., Bissig, M., Curigliano, G., Coppola, J., & Latymer, M. (2018, October 1). Talking to patients about biosimilars. Future Oncology. Future Medicine Ltd. https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2018-0044
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2018-0044
Kiss, S., Fine, H. F., Krawitz, J. (2018), Coming of Age: Biosimilars, “Ophthalmic Surgery, Lasers and Imaging Retina”, Vol. 49 (3), pp. 162–165. http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/23258160-20180221-02
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/23258160-20180221-02
Ministere des solidarites et de la sante (2018a), Strategie nationale de sante. Available at: https://solidarites-sante.gouv.fr/systeme-de-sante-et-medico-social/strategie-nationale-de-sante/article/la-strategie-nationale-de-sante-2018-2022 (accessed: 10.06.2019)
Google Scholar
Ministere des solidarites et de la sante (2018b), Summary of National Health Strategy 2018–2022. Available at: https://solidarites-sante.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/dossier_sns_2017_synthesev6-10p_anglaisv2.pdf (accessed: 9.07.2019)
Google Scholar
Ministerstwo Zdrowia (2018), Polityka lekowa państwa 2018–2022, Polityka Zdrowotna. Available at: https://www.politykazdrowotna.com/uploads/files/2018/07/16/POLITYKA_LEKOWA_PANSTWA_2018–2022_12072018_v76.pdf (accessed: 3.06.2019)
Google Scholar
O’Callaghan, J. et al. (2019), Regulation of biosimilar medicines and current perspectives on interchangeability and policy, “European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology”, Vol. 75 (1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-018-2542-1
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-018-2542-1
Remuzat, C., Kapuśniak, A., Caban, A.., Ionescu, Dan., Radiere, G., Mendoza, C., Toumi, M. (2017), Supply-side and demand-side policies for biosimilars: an overview in 10 European member states, “Journal of Market Access & Health Policy”, Vol. 5 (1), p. 1307315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2017.1307315
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2017.1307315
Reuters (2019), $2.1m Novartis gene therapy to become world’s most expensive drug, “The Guardian”. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2019/may/25/21m-novartis-gene-therapy-to-become-worlds-most-expensive-drug (accessed: 8.07.2019)
Google Scholar
Simoens, S., Jacobs, I., Popovian, R., Isakov, L., Shane, L.G. (2017), Assessing the Value of Biosimilars: A Review of the Role of Budget Impact Analysis, “PharmacoEconomics. Springer International Publishing”, Vol. 35 (10), pp. 1047–1062. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-017-0529-x
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-017-0529-x
Trifiro, G., Marciano, I. and Ingrasciotta, Y. (2018), Interchangeability of biosimilar and biological reference product: Updated regulatory positions and pre-and post-marketing evidence, “Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy”, Taylor & Francis, Vol. 18 (3), pp. 309–315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2018.1410134
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2018.1410134
cnamts.fr (2019), http://www.codage.ext.cnamts.fr/codif/bdm_it/index.php?p_site=AMELI (accessed: 1.05.2019).
Google Scholar
EMA (2019), EMA – Europejska Agencja Lekow (eng. European Medicines Agency), https://www.ema.europa.eu/en (accessed: 1.05.2019).
Google Scholar
INFARMA (2019), https://www.infarma.pl/ (accessed: 11.08.2019).
Google Scholar
medicaments.gouv.fr (2019), http://base-donnees-publique.medicaments.gouv.fr/ (accessed: 1.05.2019).
Google Scholar
MZ (2019), MZ – Ministerstwo Zdrowia, EMA (2019), EMA – Europejska Agencja Lekow (eng. European Medicines Agency), https://www.ema.europa.eu/en (accessed: 1.05.2019).
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.