Mercosur – a Comparison of Four Member Countries on the Basis of Selected Economic Indicators
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.23.04Keywords:
Mercosur, cluster analysis, country comparison, regional integrationAbstract
The aim of this paper is to present how countries can be compared on the basis of the development of selected macroeconomic indicators. The economic similarity of the four founding Mercosur countries (i.e., Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay), based on the development of five selected macroeconomic indicators in the period 1991–2016, is investigated. The following indicators were analyzed: current account balance, GDP per capita, trade-to-GDP ratio, unemployment rate, and the GDP deflator, using data from the World Bank database. Using hierarchical cluster analysis of changes in time series (differences and growth rates), it was found that the obtained clusters of countries are different. For this reason, cluster analysis was carried out for two different groups of indicators on the basis of the averages of the Euclidean distances obtained for the individual indicators.
Downloads
References
Arias, J.C. (2008), Asimetrías en el Mercosur: Un Enfoque Macroeconómico. V: Asimetrías en el Mercosur: ¿Impedimento para el Crecimiento?, Red Mercosur, Montevideo, pp. 31–85.
Baer, W., Cavalcanti, T., Silva P. (2002), Economic integration without policy coordination: the case of Mercosur?, “Emerging Market Review”, Vol. 3, No. 2002, pp. 269–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1566-0141(02)00025-0
Basnet, H.C., Pradhan, G. (2017), Regional economic integration in Mercosur: The role of real and financial sectors, “Review of Development Finance”, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rdf.2017.05.001
Campos, G.L. (2016), From success to failure: Under what conditions did Mercosur integrate?, “Journal of Economic Integration”, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 855–897. https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2016.31.4.855
Cardoso Ferraz, F. (2013), Crise Financeira Global: Impactos na Economia Brasileira, Política Econômica e Resultados [online]. Master thesis at Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro. http://www.ie.ufrj.br/images/pos-graducao/ppge/FernandoFerraz.pdf (accessed: 22.03.2019).
CEPAL (2009), Infraestructura física e integración regional, “Boletín FAL”, No. 280, pp. 1–4.
Da Silva, O.M., Batista, J.S. (2015), Uma avaliação da similaridade e da sofisticação das exportações dos países do Cone Sul, “Análise Econômica”, Vol. 33, No. 64, pp. 243–264. https://doi.org/10.22456/2176-5456.42005
De Almeida, P.R. (2018), Regional Integration in Latin America: Historical Developments, Current Challenges, Especially in Mercosur. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3182150 (accessed: 27.11.2019).
Gomes, G., Silva da Cruz, C.A. (2017), Vinte Anos de Economia Brasileira [online]. Centro de Altos Estudos Brasil Século XXI , Brasília. http://www.altosestudosbrasilxxi.org.br (accessed: 18.11.2018).
Khan, S. (2008), Regional Trade Integration and Conflict Resolution, 1st ed., International Research Development Center, Ottawa. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203889800
Kritzinger, L. (2015), Regional Integration: Concepts, Advantages, Disadvantages, and Lessons of Experience [online]. World Bank Policy Paper. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTAFRREGINICOO/Resources/Kritzinger.pdf (accessed: 22.07.2018).
Kugiel, P., Cooray, S., Wickramaratne, T. (2013), Benefits of regional integration: What Sri Lanka can learn from Poland, “PISM Policy Paper”, No. 25 (73), pp. 2–8.
Liao, T.W. (2005), Clustering of time series data – a survey, “Pattern Recognition”, Vol. 38, No. 11, pp. 1857–1874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2005.01.025
Ministério da Fazenda (2017), Balanço de Pagamentos [online]. Secretaria de Politica Econômica Janeiro, Brasília. http://www.altosestudosbrasilxxi.org.br (accessed: 17.02.2018).
Mukhametdinov, M. (2019), Mercosur and the European Union, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76825-0
Parrado, E.A., Cerrutti, M. (2003), Labor migration between developing countries: The case of Paraguay and Argentina, “International Migration Review”, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 101–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2003.tb00131.x
Peluffo, P. (2013), Assessing labor market impacts of trade opening in Uruguay, “SpringerPlus”, Vol. 2, No. 1, p. 219. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-219
Porta, F. (2008), La Integración Sudamericana en Perspectiva. Problemas y Dilemas. Documento de Proyecto, CEPAL, Santiago de Chile.
Roudil, H.R. (2006), Empleo y Desempleo en los Países Mercosur y Chile [online] http://www.relacionesdeltrabajo.fsoc.uba.ar/docs/002-roudil.pdf (accessed: 20.02.2019).
Secretaria de Planejamento e Assuntos Econômicos (2017), Crise Econômica e Recuperação: Comparativo EUA e BRA [online] http://www.planejamento.gov.br/publicacoes/estudos-economicos/170925-seplan-nota-tecnica-pib-e-a-dinamica-da-crise-v2.pdf (accessed: 22.07.2018).
SELA (2014), Evolución del Mercado Común del Sur (Mercosur), document SP/Di No. 6–14, SELA, Caracas.
Schiff, M., Winters, L. (2003), Regional Integration and Development, The World Bank, Washington, D.C. https://doi.org/10.1596/0-8213-5078-1
The World Bank (2018), Data Catalog [online] https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/world-development-indicators (accessed: 22.07.2018).
Zanchetta Borghi, R.A. (2017), The Brazilian productive structure and policy responses in the face of the international economic crisis: An assessment based on input-output analysis, “Structural Change and Economic Dynamics”, Vol. 43, pp. 62–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2017.08.001
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
