The Potential for High‑tech Exports from Selected EU Member States to China and the Related Opportunities Arising from the Belt and Road Initiative
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.27.22Keywords:
European Union, China, export potential, high‑tech productsAbstract
The EU’s economic relations with China are characterised by a significant trade deficit. Enhancing EU exports of high-tech products, in particular, to China is the best way out of this imbalance. In doing so, EU countries can take advantage of the opportunities provided by the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) that intends to improve connectivity between Europe and Asia.
Objective: This study aims to identify the untapped potential for high-tech exports of selected EU countries in trade with China and to evaluate the opportunities arising from the BRI in utilising this potential.
Research Design & Methods: To assess the overall high-tech export potential of selected EU countries to China, the export gap was calculated using the concept of revealed comparative advantages.
Findings: Among the examined EU countries, Hungary and the Czech Republic were found to have the greatest high-tech export growth potential to China. The largest export gaps were recorded in electrical machinery and equipment.
Implications & Recommendations: The findings of the study can be used by European businesses to adjust their export strategies. It can also be used by government institutions of the studied countries when designing their economic and trade policies, particularly vis-à-vis China and the BRI initiative, within the field of supporting infrastructure projects, as well as high-tech industries.
Contribution & Value Added: The study contributes to the literature on the potential of EU export growth to China that has not been sufficiently explored yet. The novelty of the study is in identifying specific high-tech commodities with the highest potential for export to China.
Downloads
References
Arsyad, M., Amiruddin, A., Suharno, S., Jahroh, S. (2020), Competitiveness of Palm Oil Products in International Trade: An Analysis between Indonesia and Malaysia, “Journal of Sustainable Agriculture”, 35 (2), pp. 157–167, https://doi.org/10.20961/carakatani.v35i2.41091 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/carakatani.v35i2.41091
Astana Times (2019), As BRI enters Italy, whom should EU blame?, https://asiatimes.com/2019/04/as-bri-enters-italy-whom-should-eu-blame/ (accessed: 11.01.2022).
Balassa, B.A. (1965), Trade Liberalization and “Revealed” Comparative Advantage, “The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies”, 33 (2), pp. 92–123, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.1965.tb00050.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.1965.tb00050.x
Balassa, B.A. (1986), Comparative Advantages in Manufactured Goods: A Reappraisal, “Review of Economics and Statistics”, 68 (2), pp. 315–319, https://doi.org/10.2307/1925512 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1925512
Braja, M., Gemzik Salwach, A. (2020), Competitiveness of high-tech exports in the EU countries, “Journal of International Studies”, 3 (1), pp. 359–372, https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2020/13-1/23 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2020/13-1/23
Brakman, S., Tijl, H., Van Marrewijk, Ch., Olsen, J. (2022), On the revealed comparative advantages of Dutch cities, “Review of International Economics”, 31 (3), pp. 785–825, https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12644 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12644
Bronček, J. (2019), Identifikácia exportného potenciálu Slovenskej republiky pri obchodovaní s Čínskou ľudovou Republikou – Ricardovský prístup, “Ekonomické rozhľady: vedecký časopis Ekonomickej univerzity v Bratislave”, 48 (2), pp. 158–178.
Decreux, Y., Spies, J. (2016), Export Potential Assessments: A methodology to identify export opportunities for developing countries, https://umbraco.exportpotential.intracen.org/media/cklh2pi5/epa-methodology_230627.pdf (accessed: 11.01.2022).
European Commission (2021), Production and international trade in high-tech products, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Production_and_international_trade_in_high-tech_products (accessed: 9.01.2022).
Falkowski, K. (2018), Competitiveness of the Baltic States in International High-Technology Goods Trade, “Comparative Economic Research – Central and Eastern Europe”, 21 (1), pp. 25–43, https://doi.org/10.2478/cer-2018-0002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cer-2018-0002
Fardella, E., Prodi, G. (2017), The Belt and Road Initiative Impact on Europe: An Italian Perspective, “China & World Economy”, 25 (5), pp. 125–138, https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12217 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12217
Fontagné, L., Freudenberg, M., Ünal Kesenci, D. (1999), Haute technologie et échelles de qualité: de fortes asymétries en Europe, “CEPII Research Center – Working Papers”, 8, http://www.cepii.fr/PDF_PUB/wp/1999/wp1999-08.pdf (accessed: 20.01.2022).
French, S. (2017), Revealed comparative advantage: What is it good for?, “Journal of International Economics”, 106, pp. 83–103, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2017.02.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2017.02.002
Garcia-Herrero, A., Xu, J. (2016), China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Can Europe Expect Trade Gains?, “Working Paper Series”, 5, Bruegel Research Institute, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2842517 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2842517
Gigler, C. (2021), The EU-China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (CAI): A glance at the schedules, https://www.roedl.com/insights/china-eu-cai-comprehensive-agreement-on-investment-schedules (accessed: 20.01.2022).
Hadzhiev, V. (2014), Overall Revealed Comparative Advantages, “Eurasian Journal of Economics and Finance”, 2 (1), pp. 47–53.
Hauk, W.R., Deb, K. (2017), RCA indices, multinational production and the Ricardian trade model, “International Economics and Economic Policy”, 14 (1), pp. 1–25, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-015-0317-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-015-0317-z
Hinloopen, J., Van Marrewijk, C. (2001), On the empirical distribution of the Balassa index, “Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv”, 137 (1), pp. 1–35, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02707598 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02707598
Hoen, A.R., Oosterhaven, J. (2006), On the measurement of comparative advantage, “The Annals of Regional Science”, 40 (3), pp. 677–691, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-006-0076-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-006-0076-4
International Trade Center (2022a), Trade Map, https://www.trademap.org/ (accessed: 11.01.2022).
International Trade Center (2022b), Market Access Map, https://www.macmap.org/ (accessed: 11.01.2022).
Karkanis, D. (2018), EU-China Trade: Geography and Institutions form 2001 to 2015, “Journal of Economic Integration”, 33 (1), pp. 1158–1175, https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2018.33.1.1158 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2018.33.1.1158
Kašťáková, E., Luptáková, A., Družbacká, B. (2022), EU – China trade cooperation in the context of the BRI: Analysis and perspectives on different examples of the EU countries, “St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies”, 38 (3), pp. 3–25, https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu05.2022.101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu05.2022.101
Lemoine, F., Ünal-Kesenci, D. (2002), China in the International Segmentation of Production Processes, “CEPII Research Center – Working Papers”, 2, http://www.cepii.fr/PDF_PUB/wp/2002/wp2002-02.pdf (accessed: 7.01.2022).
Li, Y., Bolton, K., Westphal, T. (2018), The effect of the New Silk Road railways on aggregate trade volumes between China and Europe, “Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies”, 16 (2), pp. 275–292, https://doi.org/10.1080/14765284.2018.1453720 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14765284.2018.1453720
Liu, D., Wen, H., Guo, F., Wang, C. (2019), The Impact of Northern Sea Route on Sino-European Trade Potential Based on Gravity Model, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Culture, Education and Economic Development of Modern Society (ICCESE 2019), Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, Vol. 310, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332664895_The_Impact_of_Northern_Sea_Route_on_Sino-European_Trade_Potential_Based_on_Gravity_Model (accessed: 11.01.2022). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/iccese-19.2019.380
Ma, D., Lei, C., Ullah, F., Ullah, R., Baloch, Q.B. (2020), China’s One Belt and One Road Initiative and Outward Chinese Foreign Direct Investment in Europe, “Sustainability”, 11 (24), 7055, https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247055 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247055
Mayer, T., Zignago, S. (2006), Notes on CEPII’s distances measures, http://www.cepii.fr/%5C/distance/noticedist_en.pdf (accessed: 7.01.2022).
Pitoňáková, R. (2020), Measuring trade specialisation of Slovakia on extra EU market, “International Journal of Trade and Global Markets”, 13 (1), pp. 3–10, https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTGM.2020.104914 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTGM.2020.104914
Research and Markets (2021), Global Corticosteroids Market Report 2021 Featuring Major Players – Sumitomo, Pfizer, Novartis, Merck, Sanofi, Johnson and Johnson, GSK, AstraZeneca, Cipla, and LEO Pharma, https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2021/05/13/2228869/28124/en/Global-Corticosteroids-Market-Report-2021-Featuring-ajor-Players-Sumitomo-Pfizer-Novartis-Merck-Sanofi-Johnson-and-Johnson-GSK-AstraZeneca-Cipla-and-LEO-Pharma.html (accessed: 11.01.2022).
Ribeiro, P., Carvalho, V., Santos, P. (2016), Export-Led Growth in the EU: Where and What to Export?, “The International Trade Journal”, 30 (4), pp. 319–344, https://doi.org/10.1080/08853908.2016.1197806 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08853908.2016.1197806
Ricardo, D. (1817), On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, John Murray, London.
Stellian, R., Danna-Buitrago, J. (2019), Revealed comparative advantages and regional specialization: Evidence from Colombia in the Pacific Alliance, “Journal of Applied Economics”, 22 (1), pp. 349–379, https://doi.org/10.1080/15140326.2019.1627722 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15140326.2019.1627722
Torrecillas, C., Martínez, C. (2022), Patterns of specialisation by country and sector in olive applications, “Technology in Society”, 70, 102003, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102003
Vollrath, T.L. (1991), A theoretical evaluation of alternative trade intensity measures of revealed comparative advantage, “Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv”, 127 (2), pp. 265–280, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02707986 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02707986
Wilson, J. (2021), Australia Shows the World What Decoupling From China Looks Like, https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/11/09/australia-china-decoupling-trade-sanctions-coronavirus-geopolitics/ (accessed: 12.01.2022).
World Bank (2010), Trade Indicators, https://wits.worldbank.org/wits/wits/witshelp/Content/Utilities/e1.trade_indicators.htm (accessed: 11.01.2022).
World Bank (2022), High-technology exports (% of manufactured exports), https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/TX.VAL.TECH.MF.ZS (accessed: 10.01.2022).
World Intellectual Property Organization (2021), High-Tech Trade Rebounded Strongly in the Second Half of 2020, with New Asian Exporters Benefiting, https://www.wipo.int/pressroom/en/news/2021/news_0001.html (accessed: 18.01.2022).
Xinhua (2020), Xinhua Headlines: Railway freight express puts China-EU cooperation amid pandemic on fast tracks, http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2020-06/27/c_139170811.htm (accessed: 5.01.2022).
Zábojník, S., Borovská, Z. (2021), Competitiveness of the Slovak Republic as a Determinant of its Success in Third Country Markets, The 20th International Scientific Conference Globalization and its Socio-Economic Consequences 2020, 92, pp. 21–22, https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20219209018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20219209018
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
