Analysis of the Impact of Innovative Economic Conditions on the Flow of Workers in the Labour Markets of the European Union Countries

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.26.26

Keywords:

labour market flow, transitions in labour market status, job‑to‑job, innovation economy

Abstract

The main purpose of the work is to present the results of empirical research on the impact of innovation levels in the economy on the structure of labour market flows. The analysis of the directions and scale of these flows makes it possible to discover important characteristics of the labour market and thus makes it possible to better construct and target policies to reduce unemployment or activate economically inactive people. The study uses data from the Labour Force Survey (LFS) and experimental job‑to‑job statistics for the European Union (EU) countries, covering the 2011–2019 period. We conducted research separately for selected groups of economies classified by their level of innovation, i.e. Innovation Leaders, Strong Innovators, Moderate Innovators, and Emerging Innovators. The results demonstrate that the structure of flows in a labour market depends on the innovation level of the respective economy. The main contribution of the study is that it identifies employee flow patterns in the labour markets of individual EU countries from the perspective of the innovation levels of their respective economies. Panel error correction models (ECM) and panel causality tests were used. In countries that are Innovation Leaders, an increase in participation in lifelong learning leads to a parallel increase in employee flow (EE) and job‑to‑job employee turnover. In countries that are Emerging Innovators, increasing participation in lifelong learning increases turnover, mainly among young people (15–24 age group).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akbas, Y.E., Senturk, M., Sancar, C. (2013), Testing for causality between the foreign direct investment, current account deficit, GDP and total credit: Evidence from G7, “Panoeconomicus”, 60 (6), pp. 791–812, https://doi.org/10.2298/PAN1306791A DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/PAN1306791A

Balmaseda, M., Dolado, J., Lopez Salido, J. (2000), The dynamics effects of shocks to labour markets: evidence from OECD countries, “Oxford Economic Papers”, 52 (1), pp. 3–23, https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/52.1.3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/52.1.3

Baltagi, B.H., Kao, C. (2000), Nonstationary Panels, Cointegration in Panels and Dynamic Panels: A Survey, “Syracuse University Center for Policy Research Working Paper”, 16, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1808022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1808022

Bassanini, A., Duval, R. (2006), Employment Patterns in OECD Countries: Reassessing the Role of Policies and Institutions, OECD Social, “Employment and Migration Working Papers”, 35, pp. 7–86, https://doi.org/10.1787/702031136412 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/702031136412

Blanchard, O. (2005), European unemployment: the evolution of facts and ideas, “NBER Working Paper”, 11750, https://doi.org/10.3386/w11750 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w11750

Blanchard, O.J., Diamond, P. (1990), The Cyclical Behavior of the Gross Flows of US Workers, “Brookings Papers on Economic Activity”, 2, pp. 85–155, https://doi.org/10.2307/2534505 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2534505

Boeri, T., Ours, J. van (2021), The Economics of Imperfect Labor Markets, Princeton University Press, Princeton–Oxford.

Breitung, J. (2000), The Local Power of Some Unit Root Tests for Panel Data, [in:] B. Baltagi (ed.), Advances in Econometrics, Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration, and Dynamic Panels, JAI Press, Amsterdam, pp. 161–178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0731-9053(00)15006-6

Breschi, S., Lissoni, F. (2009), Mobility of skilled workers and co-invention networks: an anatomy of localized knowledge flows, “Journal of Economic Geography”, 9 (4), pp. 439–468, https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbp008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbp008

Cournède, B., Denk, O., Garda, P. (2016), Effects of Flexibility-Enhancing Reforms on Employment Transitions, “OECD Economics Department Working Papers”, 1350, OECD Publishing, Paris.

Cournède, B., Denk, O., Garda, P., Hoeller, P. (2016), Enhancing Economic Flexibility: What Is in it for Workers?, “OECD Economic Policy Papers”, 19, OECD Publishing, Paris.

Davis, S., Faberman, R., Haltiwanger, J. (2006), The Flow Approach to Labor Markets: New Data and Micro-Macro Links, “Journal of Economic Perspectives”, 20 (3), pp. 3–26, https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.20.3.3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.20.3.3

Elsby, M.W.L., Hobijn, B., Sahin, A. (2011), Unemployment Dynamics in the OECD, “Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper”, 11–159/3.

Erdala, L., Göçer, I. (2015), The Effects of Foreign Direct Investment on R&D and Innovations: Panel Data Analysis for Developing Asian Countries, “Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences”, 195(C), pp. 749–758, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.469 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.469

European Innovation Scoreboard 2021 (2021), Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/46013 (accessed: 5.05.2022).

Eurostat (n.d.), Labour market transitions – quarterly data, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/lfsi_long_q/default/table?lang=en (accessed: 10.05.2022).

Fujita, S., Nakajima, M. (2013), Worker Flows and Job Flows: A Quantitative Investigation, “Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Working Paper”, 13–9/R, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2235857 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2235857

Gomez, P. (2012), Labour market flows: Facts from the United Kingdom, “Labour Economics”, 19 (2), pp. 165–175, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2011.08.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2011.08.002

Haldane, A.G. (2019), Climbing the Jobs Ladder, https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/files/speech/2019/climbing-the-jobs-ladder-speech-by-andy-haldane.pdf (accessed: 10.05.2022).

Haltiwanger, J., Scarpetta, S., Schweiger, H. (2013), Cross country differences in job reallocation: The role of industry, firm size and regulations, “Labour Economics”, 26, pp. 11–25, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2013.10.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2013.10.001

Janoskova, K., Kral, P. (2019), An In-Depth Analysis of the Summary Innovation Index in the V4 Countries, “Journal of Competitiveness”, 11 (2), pp. 68–83, https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2019.02.05 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2019.02.05

Kao, C. (1999), Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data, “Journal of Econometrics”, 90 (1), pp. 1–44, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00023-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00023-2

Morandini, M.-Ch., Thum-Thysen, A., Vandeplas, A. (2020), Facing the Digital Transformation: Are Digital Skills Enough?, European Economy – Economic Briefs 054, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.

Mortensen, D.T., Pissarides, C.A. (1994), Job Creation and Job Destruction in the Theory of Unemployment, “Review of Economic Studies”, 61 (3), pp. 397–415, https://doi.org/10.2307/2297896 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2297896

Moscarini, G., Postel-Vinay, F. (2017), The Relative Power of Employment-to-Employment Reallocation and Unemployment Exits in Predicting Wage Growth, “American Economic Review”, 107 (5), pp. 364–368, https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20171078 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20171078

Pedroni, P. (1999), Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels with Multiple Regressors, “Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics”, 61 (4), https://web.williams.edu/Economics/wp/pedronicriticalvalues.pdf (accessed: 15.04.2022). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.0610s1653

Pieroni, L., Pompei, F. (2008), Evaluating innovation and labour market relationships: the case of Italy, “Cambridge Journal of Economics”, 32, pp. 325–347, https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bem032 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bem032

Shimer, R. (2010), Labor Markets and Business Cycles, Princeton University Press, Princeton–Oxford, https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400835232 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400835232

Socha, M., Sztanderska, U. (2002), Strukturalne podstawy bezrobocia w Polsce, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-19 — Updated on 2023-09-29

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Węgrzyn, Grażyna, and Marcin Salamaga. 2023. “Analysis of the Impact of Innovative Economic Conditions on the Flow of Workers in the Labour Markets of the European Union Countries”. Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe 26 (3): 159-78. https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.26.26.