Problemy instytucjonalno‑prawne i organizacyjne zapewnienia systemowej polityki innowacji: przypadek Ukrainy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/cer-2019-0004Słowa kluczowe:
innowacje, system innowacji, instytucje wprowadzające innowacje, instytucje wspomagające innowacje, polityka innowacyjnaAbstrakt
W artykule dokonano analizy „systemowego” wymiaru istniejących instytucjonalno‑prawno‑organizacyjnych osobliwości polityki innowacyjnej na Ukrainie, w oparciu o podejście SI (SI – System Innowacji), które jest uważane za jedną z głównych wytycznych dla kształtowania polityki innowacyjnej, w tym w szczególności również na Ukrainie. Stwierdzono, że państwowe dokumenty strategiczne w niewystarczający sposób odzwierciedlają systemowy charakter NSI (NSI – Narodowy System Innowacji), ani też nie sytuują powiązań ani przedsiębiorstw w centrum narodowego systemu innowacji. Określono obszary, w których polityka innowacyjna nie może być w pełni realizowana ze względu na obecny sposób organizacji działań i uprawnienia centralnych organów wykonawczych w tej dziedzinie, a w szczególności na ich wpływ na biznes, tworzenie infrastruktury i rozwój powiązań. Przedmiotem analizy są doświadczenia krajów europejskich w zakresie wdrażania polityki innowacyjnej, w szczególności w zakresie tworzenia i funkcjonowania modeli krajowych agencji innowacji, a także spektrum ich funkcji. W oparciu o doświadczenia europejskie proponuje się utworzenie Państwowej Agencji ds. Innowacji i Rozwoju na Ukrainie, która będzie integrować funkcje finansowania projektów regionalnych, udzielać porad i realizować podstawowe funkcje instytucji wspomagającej innowacje.
Pobrania
Bibliografia
Asheim, B.T. & Coenen, L.J (2006), Contextualizing regional innovation systems in a globalizing learning economy: on knowledge bases and institutional frameworks, ‘Technology Transfer’, Vol. 31, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961–005–5028–0
Google Scholar
Association Agreement between Ukraine, on the one hand, and the European Union, the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, on the other side, International document, a Statement Ratified by Law of Ukraine from 16 September 2014, # 1678‑VII.
Google Scholar
Autio, E., Kenney, M., Mustar, Ph., Siegel, D. & Wright, M. (2014), Entrepreneurial innovation: the importance of context, ‘Research Policy’, Vol. 43, Is. 7, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014. 01.015
Google Scholar
Budget Code, the Law of Ukraine from 8 July 2010, # 2456‑VI.
Google Scholar
Coenen, L., Asheim, B., Bugge, M.M. & Herstad, S.J. (2016), Advancing Regional Innovation Systems: What Does Evolutionary Economic Geography Bring to the Policy, ‘Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space’, Vol. 35, Is. 4, https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0263774X16646583
Google Scholar
Cooke, P. (2001), Strategies for regional innovation systems: learning transfer and applications. Centre for Advanced Studies, Cardiff University, Cardiff.
Google Scholar
Daniluk, A. (2017), Cooperation between Business Companies and the Institutions in the Context of Innovations Implementation. Procedia Engineering, 182, DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.138
Google Scholar
European Innovation Scoreboard 2018: Ukraine profile (2018), European Commission, https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/30705
Google Scholar
Fagerberg, J. (2015), Innovation policy, national innovation systems and economic performance: in search of a useful theoretical framework, Working Papers on Innovation Studies 20150321, Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo.
Google Scholar
Fedulova, L. (2012), Problems of forming the institutional environment of innovation systems in Ukrainian regions, ‘Economic bulletin of the university’, State higher educational institution “Pereyaslav‑Khmelnytsky State Pedagogical University named after Grigory Skovoroda”, Vol. 18–1.
Google Scholar
Feinson, S. (2003), National Innovation Systems Overview and Country Cases. Vol. 1, Sec. 1, Knowledge Flows and Knowledge Collectives: Understanding the Role of Science and Technology Policies in Development. Center for Science, Policy and Outcomes, Columbia University.
Google Scholar
Hladchenko, M. & Pinheiro, R. (2018), Implementing the Triple Helix Model: Means‑Ends Decoupling at the State Level?, ‘Minerva’, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024–018–9355–3
Google Scholar
Isaksen, A. (2001), Building regional innovation systems: is endogenous industrial development possible in the global economy?, ‘Canadian Journal of Regional Science’, 24 (1).
Google Scholar
Issues of the Ministry of Economic Development and Trade, the Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine from 20 August 2014, # 459.
Google Scholar
Issues of the State Innovation Finance and Credit Institution, the Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine from 13 April 2000, # 654.
Google Scholar
Jurkovičova, L., Kubiniy, N. & Hotra, V. (2014), The role of the state in the sphere of innovative development of the agricultural complex of Ukraine, ‘Studia commercialia Bratislavensia’, Vol. 7, No. 27, DOI: 10.2478/stcb–2014–0034
Google Scholar
Kasych, А.О. & Voсhozka, M. (2017), Conceptual provisions of the development of Ukrainian national innovation system, ‘Scientific bulletin of Polissia’, No. 2 (10), DOI: 10.25140/2410–9576–2017–2–2 (10)16–23
Google Scholar
Khaustova, K.M. (2016), Estimation the impact of macroeconomic factors on the innovation activities of enterprises in Ukraine, ‘Marketing and Management of Innovations’, Vol. 3.
Google Scholar
Klein Woolthuis, R.J.A., Lankhuizen, M., & Gilsing, V. (2005), A system failure framework for innovation policy design, ‘Technovation’, 25 (6). DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2003.11.002
Google Scholar
Klerkx, L. & Leeuwis, C. (2009), Establishment and embedding of innovation brokers at different innovation system levels: insights from the Dutch agricultural sector, ‘Technological Forecasting & Social Change’, Vol. 76, DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2008.10.001
Google Scholar
Lundin, N. & Serger Schwaag, S. (2018), Agenda 2030 and A Transformative Innovation Policy – Conceptualizing and experimenting with transformative changes towards sustainability, Work in process WP 2018–01. Lund University.
Google Scholar
Lundvall Bengt‑Ake (2007), National innovation systems – analytical concept and development tool, ‘Industry and innovation’, Vol. 14, No. 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710601130863
Google Scholar
Maloney, W.F. (2017), Revisiting the national innovation system in developing countries (No. 8219). The World Bank.
Google Scholar
Martin, S. & Scott, John T. (2000), The nature of innovation market failure and the design of public support for private innovation, ‘Research Policy’, No. 29.
Google Scholar
Mazzucato, M. (2017), Mission‑oriented Innovation Policy: Challenges and Opportunities. UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose Working Paper Series, (IIPP 2017–01), https://www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/public‑purpose/wp2017–01 (accessed: 29.08.2018)
Google Scholar
On Agricultural Advisory Activities, the Law of Ukraine from 17 June 2004, # 1807‑IV.
Google Scholar
On Approval of the Concept for the Development of the National Innovation System, Order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine from 17 June 2009 # 680‑р
Google Scholar
On Creation of the State Innovation Non‑Bank Finance and Credit Institution ≪Fund for Support of Small Innovation Business≫, the Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine from 12 December 2011, # 1396.
Google Scholar
On Innovation Activity, Law of Ukraine from 4 July 2002, # 40‑IV.
Google Scholar
On Scientific and Scientific‑Technical Activity, the Law of Ukraine from 26 November 2015, # 848‑VIII.
Google Scholar
On State Budget of Ukraine for 2018, the Law of Ukraine from 7 December 2017, # 2246‑VIII.
Google Scholar
On State Regulation of Activity in the Technology Transfer Area, the Law of Ukraine from 14 September 2006, # 143‑V.
Google Scholar
On Strategy of Sustainable Development “Ukraine – 2020”, Decree of the President of Ukraine from 12 January 2015, # 5/2015.
Google Scholar
On Ukrainian Fund for Entrepreneurship Support, the Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine from 27 August 1995, # 687.
Google Scholar
Raven, R. & Walrave, B. (2018), Overcoming transformational failures in the dynamics of technological innovation systems, ‘Technological Forecasting and Social Change’ (in press), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.05.008
Google Scholar
Regulation on the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, the Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine from 16 October 2014, # 630
Google Scholar
Report on the results of monitoring of SFRD projects in 2015–2017 (2018). U‑Lead with Europe.
Google Scholar
Some issues of the state fund of regional development, the Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine from 18 March 2015, # 196.
Google Scholar
The ‘Sustainable Development Goals: Ukraine’ national baseline report (2017). Ministry of Economic Development and Trade of Ukraine, Kyiv.
Google Scholar
Verspagen, B., Hollanders, H. & Noben, L. (2018), Synthesis report on European innovation system. UNU‑MERIT.
Google Scholar
Wieczorek, A.J. & Hekkert, M.P. (2012), Systemic instruments for systemic innovation problems: a framework for policy makers and innovation scholars, ‘Science and Public Policy’, 39.
Google Scholar
Yegorov, I. & Ranga, M. (2014), Innovation, politics and tanks: the emergence of a Triple Helix system in Ukraine and the influence of EU cooperation on its development, ‘International Journal of Transitions and Innovation Systems’, Vol. 3, No. 3, https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTIS.2014.065700
Google Scholar
Zakharchenko, N.V. & Kuznietsov, E.A. (2017), The formation of the national innovation system as the basis of innovative‑investment development in Ukraine, ‘BUSINESSINFORM’, No. 10.
Google Scholar
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
