Innowacje dzięki bezpośrednim inwestycjom zagranicznym? Studium przypadku – Macedonia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1515/cer-2016-0001Słowa kluczowe:
BIZ, innowacje, Europa Południowo-WschodniaAbstrakt
Artykuł, poddając analizie innowacje w Europie Południowo-Wschodniej, a w szczególności przypadek Macedonii, koncentruje się na podstawowych zależnościach między bezpośrednimi inwestycjami zagranicznymi a innowacjami. Bezpośrednie inwestycje zagraniczne definiuje się zwykle jako większościowe lub kontrolne prawo własności firmy działającej w danym kraju (kraju przyjmującym), przez podmiot posiadający siedzibę w innym kraju. Teoria relacji państwo-przemysł-uczelnie wyższe wyjaśnia przejście od dominującej relacji przemysł-państwo w „społeczeństwie industrialnym" do rozwijającej się relacji państwo-przemysł-uczelnie wyższe w ramach „społeczeństwa wiedzy".
Od początku procesu transformacji, bezpośrednie inwestycje zagraniczne pozostają priorytetem, niezbędnym filarem, który przyczynia się do rozwoju społeczeństwa w kierunku rozwiniętej gospodarki rynkowej. Ponadto zwiększony napływ kapitału nieuchronnie niesie ze sobą rozwój innowacji. Dlatego analizowana jest kwestia, czy te dwa procesy mogą postępować i przyczyniać się do rozwoju gospodarki.
Pobrania
Bibliografia
Aitken B., Hanson G.H., et al. (1997). Spillovers, foreign investment, and export behavior. ‘Journal of International Economics’ 43(1–2): 103–132.
Google Scholar
Aitken B., Harrison A., et al. (1996). Wages and foreign ownership A comparative study of Mexico, Venezuela, and the United States.’ Journal of International Economics’ 40(3–4): 345–371.
Google Scholar
Aitken B.J., Harrison A.E. (1999). Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Direct Foreign Investment? Evidence from Venezuela. ‘American Economic Review’ 89(3): 605–618.
Google Scholar
Apostolov M. (2011). Governance and Enterprise Restructuring: The Case of Macedonia. ‘Transition Studies Review’ 18(2): 299–309.
Google Scholar
Apostolov M. (2013). Governance and enterprise restructuring in Southeast Europe: gross domestic product and foreign direct investments. ‘Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society’ 13(4): 431–438.
Google Scholar
Bandick R., Görg H., et al. (2014). Foreign Acquisitions, Domestic Multinationals, and R&D. ‘The Scandinavian Journal of Economics’ 116(4): 1091–1115.
Google Scholar
Barrios S., Görg H., et al. (2011). Spillovers through backward linkages from multinationals: Measurement matters! ‘European Economic Review’ 55(6): 862–875.
Google Scholar
Blalock G., Gertler P.J. (2008). Welfare gains from Foreign Direct Investment through technology transfer to local suppliers. ‘Journal of International Economics’ 74(2): 402–421.
Google Scholar
Blomström M., Sjöholm F. (1999). Technology transfer and spillovers: Does local participation with multinationals matter? ‘European Economic Review’ 43(4–6): 915–923.
Google Scholar
Branstetter L., Saggi K. (2011). "Intellectual Property Rights, Foreign Direct Investment and Industrial Development*." The Economic Journal 121(555): 1161–1191.
Google Scholar
Cohen B. I. (1973). Comparative Behavior of Foreign and Domestic Export Firms in a Developing Economy. ‘The Review of Economics and Statistics’ 55(2): 190–197.
Google Scholar
Criscuolo C., Haskel J. E., et al. (2010). Global engagement and the innovation activities of firms. ‘International Journal of Industrial Organization’ 28(2): 191–202.
Google Scholar
Djankov S., Murrell P. (2002). Enterprise Restructuring in Transition: A Quantitative Survey. ‘Journal of Economic Literature’ 40(3): 739–792.
Google Scholar
Etzkowitz H. (1993). Enterprises from science: The origins of science-based regional economic development. ‘Minerva’ 31(3): 326–360.
Google Scholar
Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. (1995). The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge-Based Economic Development. ‘EASST Review’ 14(1): 14–19.
Google Scholar
Fors G. (1997). Utilization of R&D Results in the Home and Foreign Plants of Multinationals. ‘The Journal of Industrial Economics’ 45(3): 341–358.
Google Scholar
Friedman M. (2007). The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits. [in:] Corporate Ethics and Corporate Governance. W. Zimmerli, M. Holzinger and K. Richter, Springer (eds) Berlin Heidelberg: 173–178.
Google Scholar
Glass A.J., Saggi K. (1999). Foreign Direct Investment and the Nature of R&D. ‘The Canadian Journal of Economics / Revue canadienne d'Economique’ 32(1): 92–117.
Google Scholar
Gorodnichenko Y., Svejnar J, Terrell K. (2007). When Does FDI Have Positive Spillovers? Evidence from 17 Emerging Market Economies. ‘Centre for Economic Policy Research’, London.
Google Scholar
Greenaway D., Hine R., et al. (2000). Further evidence on the effect of foreign competition on industry level wages. ‘Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv’ 136(3): 522–538.
Google Scholar
Hall R. E., Jones C.I (1999). Why do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output Per Worker than Others? ‘The Quarterly Journal of Economics’ 114(1): 83–116.
Google Scholar
Haskel J.E., Pereira S.C., et al. (2007). Does Inward Foreign Direct Investment Boost the Productivity of Domestic Firms? ‘Review of Economics and Statistics’ 89(3): 482–496.
Google Scholar
Howenstine N.G., Zeile W.J. (1992). Foreign Direct Investment in the United States: Establishment Data for 1987. ‘Survey of Current Business(October)’: 44–58.
Google Scholar
Jensen M.C. (2010). The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems. ‘Journal of Applied Corporate Finance’ 22(1): 43–58.
Google Scholar
Jensen M.C., Murphy K.J. (1990). Performance Pay and Top-Management Incentives. ‘Journal of Political Economy’ 98(2): 225–264.
Google Scholar
Kathuria V. (2000). Productivity spillovers from technology transfer to Indian manufacturing firms. ‘Journal of International Development’ 12(3): 343–369.
Google Scholar
Keay I. (2000). Canadian manufacturers' relative productivity performance, 1907–1990. ‘Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique’ 33(4): 1049–1068.
Google Scholar
Keller W. (2000). Do Trade Patterns and Technology Flows Affect Productivity Growth? ‘World Bank Economic Review’ 14(1): 17–47.
Google Scholar
Keller W., Yeaple S.R. (2009). Multinational Enterprises, International Trade, and Productivity Growth: Firm-Level Evidence from the United States. ‘Review of Economics and Statistics’ 91(4): 821–831.
Google Scholar
Kokko A. (1994). Technology, market characteristics, and spillovers. ‘Journal of Development Economics’ 43(2): 279–293.
Google Scholar
Konings J. (2001). The effects of foreign direct investment on domestic firms. ‘Economics of Transition’ 9(3): 619–633.
Google Scholar
La Porta R., Lopez-De-Silanes F., et al. (1999). Corporate Ownership Around the World. ‘The Journal of Finance’ 54(2): 471–517.
Google Scholar
Leydesdorff L. (2013). Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. [in:] Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. E. Carayannis, Springer New York (eds.): 1844–1851.
Google Scholar
Leydesdorff L., Meyer M. (2010). The decline of university patenting and the end of the Bayh–Dole effect. ‘Scientometrics’ 83(2): 355–362.
Google Scholar
Lowe C. U. (1982). The triple helix--NIH, industry, and the academic world. ‘Yale J Biol Med’ 55(3-4): 239–246.
Google Scholar
Nelson R. R. (1991). Why do firms differ, and how does it matter? ‘Strategic Management Journal’ 12(S2): 61–74.
Google Scholar
Nickell S.J. (1996). Competition and Corporate Performance. ‘Journal of Political Economy’ 104(4): 724–746.
Google Scholar
Sabato J.A., M. Mackenzie, et al. (1982). La Producción de Tecnología: Autónoma o Transnacional, Instituto Latinoamericano de Estudios Transnacionales.
Google Scholar
Schumpeter J.A. (2013). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, Taylor & Francis.
Google Scholar
Smarzynska Javorcik B. (2004). The composition of foreign direct investment and protection of intellectual property rights: Evidence from transition economies. ‘European Economic Review’ 48(1): 39–62.
Google Scholar
Willmore L.N. (1986). ‘The comparative performance of foreign and domestic firms in Brazil. ‘World Development’ 14(4): 489–502.
Google Scholar
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
