A Comparative Analysis of the Trade and Industrial Policies of Ukraine and China in the Context of the Obor Initiative

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.24.15

Keywords:

One Belt One Road initiative, China, Ukraine, trade policy, FTA, industrial policy

Abstract

The world economy is evolving towards multipolar globalization, and China has become a new pole of economic development. Ukraine, like other countries, is looking for ways to cooperate with China in the field of trade and investment. China, for its part, offers a model of cooperation within the framework of the OBOR (One Belt, One Road) initiative. Along with Chinese investment in transport and logistics infrastructure, OBOR aims to conclude FTAs with the countries participating in the initiative; thus, the article focuses on the issues of trade, and Ukraine’s industrial and innovation policy in the context of the OBOR initiative. A comparative analysis of both countries’ trade and industrial policies was conducted to provide a basis for evaluation. The terms of trade between Ukraine and China are not symmetrical due to the difference in the scale of the economy and trade. Additionally, Ukraine’s trade regime is relatively liberal, while the Chinese market is protected by higher tariff and non‑tariff barriers. Furthermore, the current situation in mutual trade is asymmetric. Ukraine exports mainly raw materials to China, while exports from China to Ukraine are dominated by investment and consumer goods.

The import dependence of the Ukrainian economy, in general, is high without any noticeable signs of decline. In 2014–2018, the share of imports of goods and services in GDP in Ukraine averaged 54% (for comparison, in China, this parameter was 19%). In 2018, 55% of Ukraine’s negative balance in trade in goods was due to trade with China. China seeks to conclude FTAs under the OBOR initiative, but in the current context, the liberalization of trade regimes with China will result in Ukraine growing its raw material exports to China and increasing its dependence on Chinese imports. On the other hand, China’s investment, production, research, and technological opportunities can become an important resource for Ukraine to modernize its economy. Promising areas of Chinese investment include high technology, in particular, aviation, shipbuilding, bioengineering, the development of new materials, and more. Ukraine is interested in China’s experience in implementing a number of state programs in the field of innovation development of Chinese industrial enterprises. The support system for clusters, industrial parks, Free Economic Zones (FEZs), and technology parks can be recommended for introduction into Ukrainian legislation in the sphere of developing an innovation structure in Ukraine.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AEGIS EUROPE (2016), 10 Commitments China made when it joined the WTO and has not respected, http://static1.squarespace.com/static/5537b2fbe4b0e49a1e30c01c/t/568f7bc51c1210296715af19/1452243910341/The+10+WTO+Committments+of+China.pdf (accessed: 28.02.2020).

Bieliński, T., Markiewicz, M., Oziewicz, E. (2019), Do Central and Eastern Europe Countries Play a Role in the Belt and Road Initiative? The Case of Chinese OFDI into the CEE–16 Countries, “Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe”, 22 (2), pp. 7–22, https://doi.org/10.2478/cer-2019-0009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cer-2019-0009

Boguslaev confirmed the sale of the Chinese company “Motor Sich” (2019) (in Russian), https://www.epravda.com.ua/rus/news/2019/12/13/654876/ (accessed: 5.02.2020).

Boiko, O.M. (2017), Structural components of the innovation environment of the national economy: Ukraine and other countries of the world, Materials of reports of the international scientific‑practical conference “Socio‑economic development of organizations and regions of Belarus: efficiency and innovation”, dedicated to the year of science, EE “VSTU”, Vitebsk.

China and Motor Sich are building a plant (2017) (in Russian), https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-other_news/2242211-kitaj-i-motor-sic-buduut-zavod.html (accessed: 5.02.2020).

China seeks leadership in the space industry (2018) (in Russian), https://blog.allo.ua/kitaj-stremitsya-k-liderstvu-v-kosmicheskoj-otrasli_2018-01-36/ (accessed: 5.02.2020).

Choroś‑Mrozowska, D. (2019), The Chinese Belt and Road Initiative from the Polish Perspective, “Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe”, 22 (2), pp. 39–53, https://doi.org/10.2478/cer-2019-0011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cer-2019-0011

Egorov, I.Y., Boiko, O.M., Griga, V.Y. (2015), Industrial parks in Ukraine: problems of formation and prospects of development, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Institute of Economics and Forecasting of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ministry of Economic Development and Trade of Ukraine, Research Economic Institute, Kyiv.

Ezell, S.J., Atkinson, R.D. (2015), False Promises: The Yawning Gap Between China’s WTO Commitments and Practices, The Information Technology & Innovation Foundation, September 2015, http://www2.itif.org/2015-false-promises-china.pdf?_ga=2.196300396.1589681642.1551882052-593599331.1551882052 (accessed: 28.02.2020).

Global innovation index 2019, Creating Healthy Lives, The Future of Medical Innovation (in Russian), https://www.wipo.int/publications/ru/details.jsp?id=4434 (accessed: 5.02.2020).

Huawei, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huawei (accessed: 6.04.2020).

Industry of China (in Russian), https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BC%D1%8B%D1%88%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C_%D0%9A%D0%9D%D0%A0 (accessed: 2.02.2021).

ITC, TOP 10 manufacturers of solar modules in 2019, (in Russian), https://itc.ua/news/desyatka-krupnejshih-proizvoditelej-solnechnyh-modulej-v-2019-godu/ (accessed: 5.02.2020).

Lavnykevych, D. (2018), Be Afraid of Chinese Who Bring Gifts, “Zerkalo Nedeli”, 36 (in Russian), https://zn.ua/finances/boysya-kitaycev-dary-prinosyaschih-293207_.html (accessed: 5.02.2020).

Lingling, H. (2013), On re‑invigorating the Australia‑China Free Trade Agreement negotiation process, “Journal of World Investment and Trade”, 14 (4), pp. 672–696, https://doi.org/10.1163/22119000-01404004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/22119000-01404004

Made in China 2025 (2015), https://www.csis.org/analysis/made-china-2025 (accessed: 6.04.2020).

MOFCOM (2004), Foreign Trade Law of The People’s Republic of China, http://english.mofcom.gov.cn/aarticle/policyrelease/internationalpolicy/200705/20070504715845.html (accessed: 28.02.2020).

MOFCOM (2008), Free Trade Agreement between the Government of the People’s Republic of China and the Government of New Zealand, http://images.mofcom.gov.cn/gjs/accessory/200804/1208158780064.pdf (accessed: 28.02.2020).

MOFCOM (2015), Free Trade Agreement between the Government of Australia and the Government of the People’s Republic of China, http://fta.mofcom.gov.cn/Australia/annex/xdzw_en.pdf (accessed: 28.02.2020).

Opening ceremony of the Chinese part of the Ukrainian‑Chinese Technopark in Shanghai (2011) (in Russian), https://china.mfa.gov.ua/news/2660-vidbulasy-urochista-ceremonija-vidkrittya-kitajsykoji-chastini-ukrajinsyko-kitajsykogo-tehnoparku-v-shankhaji (accessed: 2.02.2021).

Ostashko, T., Olefir, V. (2019), Prospects of free trade with China: development of domestic export and risks of import dependence, “Economy and Forecasting”, 1, pp. 124–152, https://doi.org/10.15407/econforecast2019.01.124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/econforecast2019.01.124

Studwell, D. (2017), Why Asia Succeeded. Successes and failures of the most dynamic region of the world, Nash Format, Kyiv.

The Global Competitiveness Report 2019, http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2019.pdf (accessed: 5.02.2020).

UN Comtrade Data Base, https://comtrade.un.org/ (accessed: 5.02.2020).

World Integrated Trade Solution, https://wits.worldbank.org/Default.aspx?lang=en (accessed: 5.02.2020).

WTO (2001a), Protocol on the Accession of the People’s Republic of China, The Ministerial Conference Decision of 10 Nov. 2001, https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/acc_e/completeacc_e.htm#chn (accessed: 28.02.2020).

WTO (2001b), Report of the Working Party on the Accession of China, https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/acc_e/completeacc_e.htm#chn (accessed: 28.02.2020).

WTO (2018a), China donates USD 1 million to support implementation of Trade Facilitation Agreement, “WTO News 2018”, 2 Feb. 2018, https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/pres18_e/pr816_e.htm (accessed: 28.02.2020).

WTO (2018b), China. Trade Policy Review, Revision, 14 Sep.2018,WT/TPR/G/375, Trade Policy Review Body, https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/tpr_e/tp_rep_e.htm#bycountry (accessed: 28.02.2020).

WTO (2018c), China. Trade Policy Review, 6 June 2018, Trade Policy Review Body, Report by China, https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/tpr_e/g375_e.pdf (accessed: 28.02.2020).

Downloads

Published

2021-06-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Ostashko, Tamara, Volodymyr Olefir, Vitalii Venger, and Olena Boiko. 2021. “A Comparative Analysis of the Trade and Industrial Policies of Ukraine and China in the Context of the Obor Initiative”. Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe 24 (2): 119-36. https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.24.15.

Most read articles by the same author(s)