Blood and Revenge: Animal Metaphors and Nature in Macbeth and the Oresteia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/2083-8530.30.09Keywords:
blood-shedding, animal metaphors, violence, Macbeth, the Oresteia, tragedy, revenge, human natureAbstract
Renowned classicist Gilbert Murray has made compelling arguments about the connection between Aeschylus and Shakespeare in his famous essay Hamlet and Orestes: A Study in Traditional Types. Through a close reading of the Oresteia and Macbeth, it is not difficult to find that the latter play, to some extent, is an intentioned “translation” and “rewriting” of the great theatrical tradition of the Attic tragedy, especially that represented by Aeschylus. The dramatic elements inviting such a comparative reading, among many other things, include the motif of bloodstained hands, masculine queens, sleeplessness and dream terrors, and most important of all, the mechanism of blood-shedding and revenge. This paper discusses their affinity through the lens of allusions to birds, and animals, inversion of the established order, and its final restoration to reveal Macbeth as a play that is fundamentally concerned with the classical theme of blood-shedding and revenge with its borrowing of multiple dramatic techniques.
Downloads
References
Aeschylus. Aeschylus: With an English Translation by Herbert Weir Smyth. In 2 Volumes. Ed. Herbert Weir Smyth. London: W. Heinemann G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1926.
Google Scholar
Aristotle, History of Animals. Aristotle in 23 volumes, Vol. 11. Trans. D. M. Balme. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press; London, William Heinemann Ltd., 1932.
Google Scholar
Aristotle, Poetics. Aristotle in 23 Volumes, Vol. 23. Trans. W. H. Fyfe. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press; London, William Heinemann Ltd. 1932.
Google Scholar
Bernard M. W. Knox. “The Lion in the House (Agamemnon 717-736 [Murray]).” Classical Philology 47.1 (1952): 17-25.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/363443
Collins, John Churton. Studies in Shakespeare. London: Archibald Constable & Co., 1904.
Google Scholar
Furness, H. H. [1893]. Macbeth Variorum Edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1903.
Google Scholar
Graham, Elspeth. “The Training Relationship: Horses, Hawks, Dogs, Bears, and Humans.” The Routledge Handbook of Shakespeare and Animals. Eds. Karen Raber, Holly Dugan. London: Routledge, 2021. 177-189.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003057192-19
Hazlitt, W. C. Faiths and Folklore of the British Isles. Vol. II. New York: Benjamin Bloom, 1965.
Google Scholar
Lopez, Jeremy. The Arden Introduction to Reading Shakespeare. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2018.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472581068
Muir, Kenneth. Shakespeare Survey: Volume 19, Macbeth. London: Cambridge University Press, 1967.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521069009
Peradotto, John J. “Some Patterns of Nature Imagery in the Oresteia.” The American Journal of Philology 85.4 (1964): 378-393.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/293019
Poole, Adrian. Tragedy: Shakespeare and the Greek Example. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 1987.
Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Macbeth. Ed. A. R. Braunmuller. London: Cambridge University Press, 1968.
Google Scholar
Showerman, Earl. “Shakespeare’s Greater Greek: Macbeth and Aeschylus’ Oresteia.” Brief Chronicles 3.37 (2011): 37-70.
Google Scholar
Thomson, J. A. K. Shakespeare and the Classics. New York: Barnes & Noble, 1979.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.