How to monitor local objectives for urban climate change adaptation? Insights from quantitative content analysis of selected participatory budgets in the upper Silesian-Zagłębie Metropolis

Renata Putkowska-Smoter

doi:10.18778/0208-600X.91.02

Authors

Renata Putkowska-Smoter Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Faculty of Sociology and Education

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-600X.91.02

Keywords:

participatory budgeting, urban climate change adaptation, text analysis, deliberative methods, qualitative data analysis

Abstract

Subsequent analyses of participatory budgeting in Poland emphasise the popularity of environmental issues such as greenery, air quality, and sustainable transport, which should also support objectives in urban climate change adaptation (UCCA). An increasing number of adaptation projects within local standards or ‘green’ civic budgets are often listed among the indicators in urban adaptation plans for Polish cities. However, available research studies and urban evaluation reports show that monitoring participatory budgets poses a methodological challenge. Therefore, the aim of the article is twofold. First, it proposes a method of identifying overlaps of urban climate change adaptation objectives with descriptions of projects submitted to local participatory budgets of the Upper Silesian-Zagłębie Metropolis. For this purpose, a dictionary-based text analysis of project descriptions was performed and critically examined. The second aim was to identify trends in urban climate change adaptation objectives. Thus, the quantitative distribution of coded descriptions was evaluated to investigate how subsequent types of participatory budgets (editions, green vs. standard, implemented vs. non-implemented) differed. The results demonstrate that the available database of participatory budget projects is a rich source of information on local preferences towards issues related to UCCA. To strengthen the objectives of urban climate change adaptation, city administrations can consider additional tools, such as UCCA-related tips/inspiration and targeted calls for projects, as well as supplementing participatory budgets with other deliberative methods. However, collecting precise and calculable data on this topic based on participatory budget databases requires both methodological adjustments and careful validation.

References

Bernaciak A., Kopczyński F. (2019), Participatory budgeting – an indicator of social activity of residents and a tool of environmental protection in Poland: spatial diversity in the east/west configuration, “Economics and Environment”, vol. 69, no. 2.
Google Scholar

Bińczyk E. (2018), Epoka człowieka: retoryka i marazm antropocenu, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Bryda G. (2014), CAQDAS a Badania jakościowe w Praktyce, “Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej”, vol. 10. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.10.2.02
Google Scholar

Cabannes Y. (2021), Contributions of participatory budgeting to climate change adaptation and mitigation: current local practices across the world and lessons from the field, “Environment and Urbanisation”, vol. 33, no. 2. https://doi.org/10.1177/09562478211021710
Google Scholar

Cohen T. (2012), Can participatory emissions budgeting help local authorities to tackle climate change?, “Environmental Development”, vol. 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2012.03.016
Google Scholar

Dombrowski Q. (2020), Preparing Non-English Texts for Computational Analysis, “Modern Languages Open”, vol. 1. http://doi.org/10.3828/mlo.v0i0.294
Google Scholar

Geisler C., Swarts J. (2019), Coding Streams of Language: Techniques for the Systematic Coding of Text, Talk, and Other Verbal Data, The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado.
Google Scholar

Hulme M. (2009), Why we disagree about climate change: understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity, Cambridge, UK.
Google Scholar

Jamontt M.J., Kociszewski K., Platje J. (2021), Wrocławski Budżet Obywatelski jako narzędzie do wzmacniania kapitału naturalnego i odporności miasta na zmiany klimatu w latach 2016–2018, “Studia Miejskie”, vol. 37. https://doi.org/10.25167/sm.1523
Google Scholar

Kajdanek K. (2015), Budżet obywatelski czy „budżet obywatelski”? Komentarz w sprawie Wrocławskiego Budżetu Obywatelskiego, “Problemy Rozwoju Miast”, vol. 2.
Google Scholar

Kuckartz U. (2014), Qualitative Text Analysis: A Guide to Methods, Practice & Using Software. Sage.
Google Scholar

Kwartler T. (2017), Text Mining in Practice with R, Wiley.
Google Scholar

Macanovic A. (2022), Text mining for social science – The state and the future of computational text analysis in sociology, “Social Science Research”, vol. 108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2022.102784
Google Scholar

Martela B. (2024), Ocena zielonych pul w budżetach obywatelskich w perspektywie wyzwań klimatycznych, “Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, sectio K – Politologia”, vol. 2. https://doi.org/10.17951/k.2023.30.2.179-200
Google Scholar

Martela B., Janik L., Mróz K., (2023), Barometr budżetu obywatelskiego. Edycja 2022, Instytut Rozwoju Miast i Regionów.
Google Scholar

Masik G., Gajewski R. (2021), Working towards urban capacity and resilience strategy implementation: Adaptation plans and strategies in Polish cities, “Cities”, vol. 119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103381
Google Scholar

Mączka K., Jeran A., Matczak P., Milewicz M., Allegretti G. (2021), Models of Participatory Budgeting. Analysis of Participatory Budgeting Procedures in Poland, “Polish Sociological Review”, vol. 4. https://doi.org/10.26412/psr216.03
Google Scholar

Michalska-Żyła A., Brzeziński K. (2018), Budżet partycypacyjny jako mechanizm współrządzenia miastem, “Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, sectio K – Politologia”, vol. 24, no. 2. https://doi.org/10.17951/k.2017.24.2.205
Google Scholar

Nelson L.K. (2020), Computational Grounded Theory: A Methodological Framework, “Sociological Methods & Research”, vol. 49, no. 1. https://doi.org/0.1177/0049124117729703
Google Scholar

Norgaard K.M. (2011), Living in denial: climate change, emotions, and everyday life, Cambridge, Mass.
Google Scholar

OECD Network on Fiscal Relations across Levels of Government (2022), Dispelling Myths about Participatory Budgeting across Levels of Government.
Google Scholar

Olejniczak J., Bednarska-Olejniczak D. (2021), Participatory Budgets of Polish Major Cities During Covid-19, “European Research Studies Journal”, vol. XXIV, Special Issue 3. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/2553
Google Scholar

Pancewicz A., Bednarz D., Drożdż D., Marszoł M., Suchy N. (2023), The Use of Nature-Based Solutions in the Adaptation of Large Polish Cities to Climate Change and Energy Transformation: A Comparative Analysis, “Energies”, vol. 16, no. 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16135189
Google Scholar

Popławski M., Gawłowski R. (2023), Participatory Budget as a Method of E-democracy Development or Merely a Voting Tool?, “Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego”, vol. 71, no. 1. https://doi.org/10.15804/ppk.2023.01.20
Google Scholar

Pytlik B. (2017), Budżet partycypacyjny w Polsce. Ewolucja i dylematy, “Studia z Polityki Publicznej”, no. 1(13). https://doi.org/10.33119/KSzPP.2017.1.6
Google Scholar

Rzeńca A. (2018), Zielone budżety partycypacyjne, [in:] Międzysektorowa współpraca na rzecz zieleni w mieście, Fundacja Sendzimira.
Google Scholar

Sinervo L.-M., Bartocci L., Lehtonen P., Ebdon C. (2024), Toward sustainable governance with participatory budgeting, “Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management”, vol. 36, no. 1. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-11-2023-0205
Google Scholar

Sodoge J., Kuhlicke C., De Brito M.M. (2023), Automatized spatio-temporal detection of drought impacts from newspaper articles using natural language processing and machine learning, “Weather and Climate Extremes”, vol. 41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2023.100574
Google Scholar

Szczepańska A., Zagroba M., Pietrzyk K. (2022), Participatory Budgeting as a Method for Improving Public Spaces in Major Polish Cities, “Social Indicators Research”, vol. 162, no. 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02831-3
Google Scholar

Ślebocka M., Revitalization microprojects: how the civic budget supports regeneration activities in cities: the Łódź city case study, “Ekonomia i Prawo”, vol. 21, no. 4. https://doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2022.041
Google Scholar

Wolszon M., Zając M., Tyrańska-Fobke A. (2023), Inequalities in health – the needs of the residents of Polish cities expressed in Participatory Budget projects, “Journal of Health Inequalities”, vol. 9, no. 2. https://doi.org/10.5114/jhi.2023.131224
Google Scholar