Sexual Difference and the Uterus in Luis Mercado, Rodrigo de Castro, and Zacuto Lusitano
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1505-9065.21.05Keywords:
sixteenth and seventeenth centuries treatises on gynaecology, sexual difference, Luis Mercado, Rodrigo de Castro, Zacuto LusitanoAbstract
Many treatises on gynaecology of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries describe the uterus as the cause of women’s diseases, according to a perspective inherited from the Hippocratic Corpus and Aretaeus. Simultaneously, however, and in a more positive view much indebted to Galen, its position, form and functions were presented as the admirable work of a wise nature that does nothing at random. In this paper, I aim to analyse the tension resulting from the coexistence of these two perspectives in Luis Mercado’s, Rodrigo de Castro’s, and Zacuto Lusitano’s treatises on women’s diseases and how the tension between the two is articulated with these authors’ views on sexual difference. Common to the three is an evident effort to aggrandise the subject of their treatises and to present women’s medical care as a particularly challenging area of expertise in which the medical author is a key authoritative character.
References
Arrizabalaga, Jon, “Medical Ideals in the Sephardic Diaspora: Rodrigo’s de Castro’s Portrait of the Perfect Physician in Early Seventeenth-Century Hamburg”, Health and Medicine in Hapbsburg Spain: agents, practices, representations, ed. Teresa Huguet-Thermes, Jon Arrizabalaga, Harold J. Cook, Supplement no 29, London, The Wellcome Trust Centre of the History of Medicine at UCL, 2009, p. 107-124
Blanco Pérez, José Ignácio, Humanistas Medicos en el Renacimiento Vallisoletano, Burgos, Universidad de Burgos, 1999
Cadden, Joan, Meanings of Sex Difference in the Middle Ages: Medicine, Science, and Culture, Cambridge University Press, 1993
Carvalho, Teresa Nobre de, “Lusitano, Zacuto”, in Biografias de Cientistas, Engenheiros e Médicos Portugueses, URL: https://dicionario.ciuhct.org/cientistas/z/lusitano-zacuto/, consulted on 05.03.2025
Castro, Rodrigo de, De uniuersa muliebrium morborum medicina, Hamburgi, ex bibliopolio Frobeniano, 1617
Castro, Rodrigo de, De uniuersa mulierum medicina, Hamburgi, ex bibliopolio Frobeniano, 1603
Du Laurens, André, Historia anatomica, Frankfurt, sumtibus Iohnae Rodii, 1602
Galen, On the Usefulness of the Parts of the Body, trans. Margaret T. May, Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 1968
González Manjarrés, Miguel Ángel, “Quae in ipso coitu observanda. Técnica compositiva en un capítulo de la Universa muliebrium morbōrum medicina de Rodrigo de Castro”, Ágora: Estudos Clássicos em Debate, 2021, 23.1, p. 343-370
Hippocrates, t. XI, Diseases of Women 1-2, edited and translated by Paul Potter, Harvard University Press, 2018
Hutson, Lorna, “The housewife and the humanists”, Feminism and Renaissance Studies, ed. Lorna Hutson, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999, p. 82-105, https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198782445.003.0004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198782445.003.0004
King, Helen, Midwifery, Obstetrics and the Rise of Gynaecology, Aldershot, Ashgate, 2007
King, Helen, The One-Sex Model on Trial: The Classical and Early Modern Evidence, Aldershot, Ashgate, 2013
King, Helen, “Seeing the bigger picture: What is gynaecology for?,” Ágora: Estudos Clássicos em Debate, 2021, 23.1, p. 17-47
Lemos, Maximiano, Zacuto Lusitano: a sua vida e a sua obra, Eduardo Tavares Martins, Editor, 1909
Manuli, Paola, “Donne mascoline, femmine sterili, vergini perpetue. La ginecologia greca tra Ippocrate e Sorano”, in Madre Materia. Sociologia e biologia della donna greca, ed. Silvia Campese, Paola Manuli, Giulia Sissa, Torino, Boringhieri, 1983
Mercado, Luis, De mulierum affectionibus, Vallesoleti, Didacus Fernandez a Corduba, 1579
Pinheiro, Cristina, “From flesh to text: The chapters on the uterus and its parts in Rodrigo de Castro’s De uniuersa mulierum medicina”, Ágora: Estudos Clássicos em Debate, 2021, 23.1, p. 293-317
Pinheiro, Cristina, “Os prefácios do tratado de ginecologia de Rodrigo de Castro Lusitano”, in Diálogos Luso-Sefarditas, ed. António M. L. Andrade, Saul A. Gomes, Maria de Fátima Reis, Aveiro, UA Editora – Universidade de Aveiro, 2022
Pinheiro, Cristina, Mota, Bernardo, A medicina completa das mulheres, t. 1, Lisboa, Afrontamento, 2022, https://doi.org/10.51427/10451/57588
Pinheiro, Cristina, Mota, Bernardo, A medicina completa das mulheres, t. 2, Lisboa, Afrontamento, 2022, https://doi.org/10.51427/10451/57588 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51427/10451/57588
Pomata, Gianna, “Was there a Querelle des Femmes in early modern medicine?”, Arenal, 2013, 20.1, p. 313-341, https://doi.org/10.30827/arenal.v20i2.1569 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30827/arenal.v20i2.1569
Rojo Veja, Anastacio, “Biografía del doctor Luis Mercado”, Revista Española de Investigaciones Quirúrgicas, 2015
Stolberg, Michael, “A woman down to her bones: the anatomy of sexual difference in early modern Europe”, Isis, 2003, 94, p. 274-299, https://doi.org/10.1086/379387 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/379387
Zacuto Lusitano, Operum tomus primus, Lugduni, sumptibus Ioannis Antonii Huguetani, filii et Marci Antonii Ravaud, 1649
Zacuto Lusitano, Praxis historiarum liber nonus, in quo curatio muliebrium morborum ubertim expenditur, Amstelodami, Sumptibus Henrici Laurentii Bibliopolae, 1642
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.



