Covering the Feminine Form in the Osler Library of the History of Medicine

Mary Hague-Yearl

doi:10.18778/1505-9065.21.17

Auteurs

Mary Hague-Yearl Osler Library of the History of Medicine, McGill University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7858-2122

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.18778/1505-9065.21.17

Mots-clés :

William Osler, bibliothèques, anatomie féminine, sexisme

Résumé

Pour William Osler, bien saisir l’histoire de la médecine était cruciale à la formation d’un bon médecin. C’est cette conviction qui était derrière sa décision d’amasser une bibliothèque dédiée à l’histoire de la médecine pour la Faculté de médecine de McGill. Le but d’Osler était de créer une bibliothèque qui reflétait les fondements intellectuels de la profession médicale, mais il était aussi conscient de la subjectivité dans l’acte de collectionner une bibliothèque. Ce chapitre examine les biais inhérents dans la bibliothèque d’Osler en ce qui à trait aux femmes : des biais dans leur représentation comme autrices et comme sujets, et des biais présents dans les pages des livres qu’il a sélectionnés. À travers ses livres et son organisation interne, la bibliothèque a renforcé de manière inconsciente les notions de la sexualité féminine de la société dominante. Aujourd’hui, la bibliothèque Osler conserve une large étendue de littérature disponible aux chercheurs intéressés par le corps et la sexualité féminins, un développement qui reflète les changements survenus dans le tissu social et culturel dominant.

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

Biographie de l'auteur

Mary Hague-Yearl, Osler Library of the History of Medicine, McGill University

Mary Hague-Yearl directs the Osler Library of the History of Medicine and is an Associate Member of McGill’s Department of Social Studies of Medicine. She holds degrees in the history of medicine and in archives and library science. In the past, she studied the interplay between medicine and religion in the pre-modern period, and more recently she has given her attention to the representation (or lack thereof) of marginalized groups in historical medical texts.

Références

Arons, Wendy, When Midwifery Became the Male Physician’s Province. The Sixteenth Century Handbook: The Rose Garden for Pregnant Women and Midwives, Jefferson, NC, McFarland, 1994
Google Scholar

Bliss, Michael, William Osler: A Life in Medicine, Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 1999
Google Scholar

Carlino, Andrea, “Knowe Thyself: Anatomical Figures in Early Modern Europe”, RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics, 1995, t. 27, p. 52-69, URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20166917; https://doi.org/10.1086/RESv27n1ms20166917
Google Scholar

Casteen, Elizabeth, From She-Wolf to Martyr: The Reign and Disputed Reputation of Johanna I of Naples, Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9780801453861.001.0001
Google Scholar

Del Carmen Lacy-Niebla, M., “El Dr. James Miranda Stuart Barry. Un Gran Médico Con Un Gran Secreto”, Archivos de Cardiología de México, 2023, t. 93, no 1, p. 1-3, https://doi.org/10.24875/acm.m22000084
Google Scholar

Didi-Huberman, Georges, Invention of Hysteria: Charcot and the Photographic Iconography of the Salpêtrière, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 2003
Google Scholar

Du Preez, Michael, Dronfield, Jeremy, Dr. James Barry: A Woman Ahead of Her Time, London, Oneworld Publications, 2016
Google Scholar

Febvre, Lucien, The Problem of Unbelief in the Sixteenth Century, the Religion of Rabelais, trans. Beatrice Gottlieb, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1982
Google Scholar

Fissell, Mary E., “Hairy Women and Naked Truths: Gender and the Politics of Knowledge in ‘Aristotle’s Masterpiece’”, The William and Mary Quarterly, 2003, t. 60, no 1, p. 43-74, https://doi.org/10.2307/3491495
Google Scholar

Gillett, Margaret, We Walked Very Warily: A History of Women at McGill, Montreal, Eden Press Women’s Publications, 1981
Google Scholar

Harley, David, “Historians as Demonologists: The Myth of the Midwife-witch”, in Witchcraft, Healing, and Popular Diseases: New Perspectives on Witchcraft, Magic, and Demonology, ed. Brian P. Levack, Hoboken, Taylor and Francis, 2012
Google Scholar

Harvey, Karen, The Imposteress Rabbit-Breeder: Mary Toft and Eighteenth-Century England, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2020
Google Scholar

Healey, Jenna, “‘A Vile Custom’: The Strange Career of William Osler’s ‘Professional Notes’”, Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 2023, t. 20, p. 1-21, https://doi.org/10.1093/jhmas/jrad072
Google Scholar

Heilmann, Ann, Neo-/Victorian Biographilia and James Miranda Barry: A Study in Transgender and Transgenre, [Cham, Switzerland], Palgrave Macmillan, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71386-1
Google Scholar

Jordanova, Ludmilla, Sexual Visions: Images of Gender in Science and Medicine between the Eighteenth and Twentieth Centuries, Madison, University of Wisconsin Press, 1989
Google Scholar

Massey, Lyle, “The Alchemical Womb: Johann Remmelin’s Catoptrum microcosmicum”, in Visual Cultures of Secrecy in Early Modern Europe, ed. Timothy McCall, Sean Roberts, University Park, PA, Penn State University Press, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5325/j.ctv1gbrrmt.14
Google Scholar

Moore, Rosemary, “Monsters and the Maternal Imagination: The ‘First Vision’ from Johann Remmelin’s 1619 Catoptrum microcosmicum Triptych”, in Exceptional Bodies in Early Modern Culture Concepts of Monstrosity before the Advent of the Normal, ed. Maja Bondestam, Baltimore, Maryland, Project Muse, 2020, p. 59-83, URL: https://muse.jhu.edu/book/78765/; https://doi.org/10.5040/9789048566709.ch-002
Google Scholar

Nichols, Marcia D., Fixing Women: The Birth of Obstetrics and Gynecology in Britain and America, San Francisco, CA, University of California, Medical Humanities Consortium, 2021
Google Scholar

Olszynko-Gryn, Jesse, “Predictor: The First Home Pregnancy Test,” Journal of British Studies, 2020, t. 59, no 3, p. 638-642, https://doi.org/10.1017/jbr.2020.70
Google Scholar

Osler, William, Bibliotheca Osleriana, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1929
Google Scholar

Sethna, Christabelle, “The Evolution of the Birth Control Handbook: From Student Peer-Education Manual to Feminist Self-Empowerment Text, 1968-1975”, Canadian Bulletin of Medical History / Bulletin canadien d’histoire de la médecine, 2006, t. 23, no 1, p. 89-117, https://doi.org/10.3138/cbmh.23.1.89
Google Scholar

Stephens, Elizabeth, “Re-Imagining the “Birthing Machine”: Art and Anatomy in Obstetric and Anatomical Models Made by Women”, in Anatomy of the Medical Image, Leiden, Brill, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004445017_005
Google Scholar

Van der Weiden, Robin M. F., Uhlenbeck, G. C., “European 18th-Century Obstetrical Pioneers in Japan: A New Light in the Empire of the Sun”, Journal of Medical Biography, 2010, t. 18, no 2, p. 99-101, https://doi.org/10.1258/jmb.2010.010006
Google Scholar

Van Lieburg, M. J., Nieuw Licht Op Hendrik van Deventer (1651-1724), Rotterdam, Erasmus, 2002
Google Scholar

Veith, Ilza, “The beginnings of modern Japanese obstetrics”, Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 1951, t. 25, no 1, p. 45-59
Google Scholar

Wilson, Adrian, The Making of Man-Midwifery: Childbirth in England, 1660-1770, Abingdon, Oxon, Routledge, 1995
Google Scholar