Representing, Defending, and Questioning Religion: Pragmatist Sociological Motifs in Plato’s "Timaeus", "Phaedo", "Republic", and "Laws"

Authors

  • Robert Prus University of Waterloo, Canada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.09.1.01

Keywords:

Plato, Religion, Pragmatism, Sociology, Symbolic Interactionism, Emile Durkheim, George Herbert Mead, Morality, Deviance, „Republic”, „Laws”, „Timaeus”, „Phaedo”

Abstract

Plato may be best known as a philosopher, but his depictions of people’s involvements in religion are important for social scientists not only because of the transcultural and transhistorical resources that they offer those in the sociology of religion, but also because of their more general pragmatist contributions to the study of human group life.

Thus, although Plato (a) exempts religion from a more thorough going dialectic analysis of the sort to which he subjects many other realms of human knowing and acting (e.g., truth, justice, courage, rhetoric), (b) explicitly articulates and encourages theological viewpoints in some of his texts, and (c) sometimes writes as though things can be known only as ideal types or pure forms in an afterlife existence, Plato also (d) engages a number of consequential pragmatist (also pluralist, secular) aspects of people’s experiences with religion.

In developing his materials on religion, Plato rejects the (popular) notions of the Olympian gods described by Homer and Hesiod as mythical as well as sacrilegious. Still, it is instructive to be mindful of Plato’s notions of divinity when considering the more distinctively sociological matters he addresses (as in the problematics of promoting and maintaining religious viewpoints on both collective and individual levels and discussions of the interlinkages of religion, morality, and deviance).

Still, each of the four texts introduced here assume significantly different emphases and those interested in the study of human group life should be prepared to adjust accordingly as they examine these statements. All four texts are consequential for a broader “sociology of religion,” but Timaeus and Phaedo are notably more theological in emphases whereas Republic and Laws provide more extended insight into religion as a humanly engaged realm of endeavor.

The paper concludes with an abbreviated comparison of Plato’s notions of religion with Chicago- style symbolic interactionist (Mead 1934; Blumer 1969; Prus 1996; 1997; 1999; Prus and Grills 2003) approaches to the study of religion. Addressing some related matters, an epilogue briefly draws attention to some of the affinities of Emile Durkheim’s The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life with Plato’s analysis of religion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Robert Prus, University of Waterloo, Canada

Robert Prus is a sociologist at the University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. A symbolic interactionist, ethnographer, and social theorist, Robert Prus has been examining the conceptual and methodological connections of American pragmatist philosophy and its sociological offshoot, symbolic interactionism, with Classical Greek, Roman, and interim European scholarship.

References

Aquinas, Thomas St. 1981. Summa Theologica. 5 volumes. Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province. Ellen, TX: Christian Classics.
Google Scholar

Aristotle. 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle. Edited by Jonathan Barnes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar

Augustine, St. 1984. City of God: Against the Pagans. Translated by Henry Bettenson. New York: Penguin.
Google Scholar

Becker, Howard S. 1963. Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: Free Press.
Google Scholar

Berger, Peter. 1967. The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Google Scholar

Berger, Peter and Thomas Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
Google Scholar

Blumer, Herbert. 1969. Symbolic Interaction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Google Scholar

Boethius. 1962. The Consolation of Philosophy. Translated by Richard Green. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
Google Scholar

Cicero. 1951. De Natura Deorum [On the Nature of the Gods]. Translated by H. Rackham. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar

Durkheim, Emile. 1915 [1912]. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Translated by Joseph Ward Swain. London: Allen and Unwin.
Google Scholar

Durkheim, Emile. 1933 [1893]. The Division of Labor in Society. Translated by G. Simpson. New York: Free Press.
Google Scholar

Durkheim, Emile. 1951 [1897]. Suicide. Translated by J. A. Spaulding and G. Simpson. New York: Free Press.
Google Scholar

Durkheim, Emile. 1958 [1895]. The Rules of Sociological Method. Translated by S. A. Solvay and E. G. Catlin. New York: Free Press.
Google Scholar

Durkheim, Emile. 1961 [1902-1903]. Moral Education: A Study in the Theory and Application of the Sociology of Education. Translated by Everett K. Wilson and Herman Schnurer. New York: Free Press.
Google Scholar

Durkheim, Emile. 1977 [1904-1905]. The Evolution of Educational Thought. Translated by Peter Collins. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Google Scholar

Durkheim, Emile. 1983 [1913-1914]. Pragmatism and Sociology. Translated by J. C. Whitehouse. Edited and Introduced by John B. Allcock. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Durkheim, Emile. 1993. Ethics and The Sociology of Morals. Translated by Robert T. Hall. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.
Google Scholar

Festinger, Leon, Henry Riecken, and Stanley Schachter. 1956. When Prophecy Fails. New York: Harper and Row.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10030-000

Glaser, Barney G. and Anselm L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
Google Scholar

Heilman, Samuel. 1998. Synagogue Life: A Study in Symbolic Interaction. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Google Scholar

Heilman, Samuel. 2002. People of the Book: Drama, Fellowship, and Religion. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. 1975. Hobbes’ Thucydides. Edited by Richard B. Schlatter. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. 1994. Leviathan (With selected variants from the Latin Edition of 1668). Edited by Edwin Curley. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
Google Scholar

Jorgensen, Danny L. 1992. The Esoteric Scene, Cultic Milieu, and Occult Tarot. New York: Garland.
Google Scholar

Kahl, Kristina. 2012. “«My God Wants Me to Live Simply »: The Constructed Selfhood of Faith-Based Simple Livers.” Symbolic Interaction 35(3):249-266.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.20

Kleinman, Sheryl. 1984. Equals Before God: Seminarian as Humanist Professionals. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Luckmann, Thomas. 1967. The Invisible Religion: The Transformation of Symbols in Industrial Society. New York: Macmillan.
Google Scholar

Mead, George H. 1934. Mind, Self and Society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Plato. 1937. The Dialogues of Plato. Edited by Benjamin Jowett. New York: Random House.
Google Scholar

Plato. 1961. The Collected Dialogues of Plato. Edited by Edith Hamilton and Huntington Cairns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400835867

Plato. 1997. Plato: The Collected Works. Edited by John M. Cooper. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
Google Scholar

Prus, Robert. 1976. “Religious Recruitment and the Management of Dissonance: A Sociological Perspective.” Sociological Inquiry 46(2):127-134.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1976.tb00757.x

Prus, Robert. 1996. Symbolic Interaction and Ethnographic Research: Intersubjectivity and the Study of Human Lived Experience. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Google Scholar

Prus, Robert. 1997. Subcultural Mosaics and Intersubjective Realities: An Ethnographic Research Agenda for Pragmatizing the Social Sciences. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Google Scholar

Prus, Robert. 1999. Beyond the Power Mystique: Power as Intersubjective Accomplishment. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Google Scholar

Prus, Robert. 2003a. “Ancient Precursors.” Pp. 19-38 in Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism, edited by Larry T. Reynolds and Nancy J. Herman-Kinney. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
Google Scholar

Prus, Robert. 2003b. “Policy as a Collective Venture: A Symbolic Interactionist Approach to the Study of Organizational Directives.” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 23(6):13-60.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01443330310790589

Prus, Robert. 2004. “Symbolic Interaction and Classical Greek Scholarship: Conceptual Foundations, Historical Continuities, and Transcontextual Relevancies.” The American Sociologist 35(1):5-33.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-004-1001-x

Prus, Robert. 2006. “In Defense of Knowing, In Defense of Doubting: Cicero Engages Totalizing Skepticism, Sensate Materialism, and Pragmatist Realism in Academica.” Qualitative Sociology Review 2(3):21-47. http://www.qualitativesociologyreview.org/ENG/Volume5/QSR_2_3_Prus.pdf
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.2.3.03

Prus, Robert. 2007a. “Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics: Laying the Foundations for a Pragmatist Consideration of Human Knowing and Acting.” Qualitative Sociology Review 3(2):5-45. http://www.qualitativesociologyreview.org/ENG/Volume7/QSR_3_2_Prus.pdf
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.3.2.02

Prus, Robert. 2007b. “Human Memory, Social Process, and the Pragmatist Metamorphosis: Ethnological Foundations, Ethnographic Contributions and Conceptual Challenges.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 36(4):378-437.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241606299029

Prus, Robert. 2007c. “On Studying Ethnologs (Not just People, «Societies in Miniature»): On the Necessities of Ethnography, History, and Comparative Analysis.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 36(6):669-703.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241606299030

Prus, Robert. 2008a. “Aristotle’s Rhetoric: A Pragmatist Analysis of Persuasive Interchange.” Qualitative Sociology Review 4(2):24-62. http://www.qualitativesociologyreview.org/ENG/Volume10/QSR_4_2_Prus.pdf
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.4.2.02

Prus, Robert. 2008b. “On the Pragmatics and Problematics of Defining Beauty and Character: The Greek Poet Lucian (120-200) Engages Exacting Portraitures and Difficult Subjects.” Qualitative Sociology Review 4(1):3-20. http://www.qualitativesociologyreview.org/ENG/Volume9/QSR_4_1_Prus.pdf
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.4.1.01

Prus, Robert. 2008c. “Producing, Consuming, and Providing Instruction on Poetic Texts in the Classical Roman Era: The Pragmatist Contributions of Horace (65-8 BCE), Longinus (100 CE), and Plutarch (46-125 CE).” Studies in Symbolic Interaction 30:81-103.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-2396(08)30006-4

Prus, Robert. 2009a. “Poetic Expressions and Human Enacted Realities: Plato and Aristotle Engage Pragmatist Motifs in Greek Fictional Representations.” Qualitative Sociology Review 5(1):3-27. http://www.qualitativesociologyreview.org/ENG/Volume12/QSR_5_1_Prus.pdf
Google Scholar

Prus, Robert. 2009b. “Reconceptualizing the Study of Community Life: Emile Durkheim’s Pragmatism and Sociology.” The American Sociologist 40:106-146.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-009-9066-1

Prus, Robert. 2010. “Creating, Sustaining, and Contesting Definitions of Reality: Marcus Tullius Cicero (106- 43B CE) as a Pragmatist Theorist and Analytic Ethnographer.” Qualitative Sociology Review 6(2):3-50. http://www.qualitativesociologyreview.org/ENG/Volume16/QSR_6_2_Prus.pdf
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.6.2.01

Prus, Robert. 2011a. “Defending Education and Scholarship in the Classical Greek Era: Pragmatist Motifs in the Works of Plato (c420-348 BCE) and Isocrates (c436- 338 BCE).” Qualitative Sociology Review 7(1):1-35. http://www.qualitativesociologyreview.org/ENG/Volume18/QSR_7_1_Prus.pdf
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.07.1.01

Prus, Robert. 2011b. “Examining Community Life «in the Making»: Emile Durkheim’s Moral Education.” The American Sociologist 42:56-111.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-010-9119-5

Prus, Robert. 2011c. “Morality, Deviance, and Regulation: Pragmatist Motifs in Plato’s Republic and Laws.” Qualitative Sociology Review 7(2):1-44. http://www.qualitativesociologyreview.org/ENG/Volume19/QSR_7_2_Prus.pdf
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.07.2.01

Prus, Robert. 2011d. “On the Processes and Problematics of Representing Divinity: Dio Chrysostom (c40-120) and the Pragmatist Motif.” Pp. 203-221 in History, Time, Meaning, and Memory: Ideas for the Sociology of Religion, edited by Barbara Jones Denison. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
Google Scholar

Prus, Robert. 2011e. “Religion, Platonist Dialectics, and Pragmatist Analysis: Marcus Tullius Cicero’s Contributions to the Philosophy and Sociology of Divine and Human Knowing.” Qualitative Sociology Review 7(3):1-30. http://www.qualitativesociologyreview.org/ENG/Volume20/QSR_7_3_Prus.pdf
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.7.3.01

Prus, Robert. 2012. “On the Necessity of Re-engaging the Classical Greek and Latin Literatures: Lessons from Emile Durkheim’s The Evolution of Educational Thought.” The American Sociologist 43:172-202.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-012-9154-5

Prus, Robert and Scott Grills. 2003. The Deviant Mystique: Involvements, Realities, and Regulation. Westport, CN: Praeger.
Google Scholar

Prus, Robert and Matthew Burk. 2010. “Ethnographic Trailblazers: Herodotus, Thucydides, and Xenophon.” Qualitative Sociology Review 6(3):3-28. http://www.qualitativesociologyreview.org/ENG/Volume17/QSR_6_3_Prus_Burk.pdf
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.6.3.01

Prus, Robert and Fatima Camara. 2010. “Love, Friendship, and Disaffection in Plato and Aristotle: Toward a Pragmatist Analysis of Interpersonal Relationships.” Qualitative Sociology Review 6(3):29-62. http://www.qualitativesociologyreview.org/ENG/Volume17/QSR_6_3_Prus_Camara.pdf
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.6.3.02

Puddephatt, Antony and Robert Prus. 2007. “Causality, Agency, and Reality: Plato and Aristotle Meet G. H. Mead and Herbert Blumer.” Sociological Focus 40(3):265-286.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00380237.2007.10571310

Shaffir, William. 1974. Life In A Religious Community: The Lubavitcher Chassidim In Montreal. Toronto: Holt, Rinehart and Winston of Canada.
Google Scholar

Shaffir, William. 1978a. “Becoming an Orthodox Jew: The Socialization of Newcomers in a Chassidic Community.” Pp. 295-309 in The Canadian Ethnic Mosaic: A Quest for Identity, edited by L. Dreidger. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.
Google Scholar

Shaffir, William. 1978b. “Witnessing as Identity Consolidation: The Case of Lubavitcher Chassidim.” Pp.39-57 in Identity and Religion, edited by H. Mol. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar

Shaffir, William. 1983. “Hassidic Jews and Quebec Politics.” The Jewish Journal of Sociology 25(2):105-118.
Google Scholar

Shaffir, William. 1987. “Separated From the Mainstream: The Hassidic Community of Tash.” The Jewish Journal of Sociology 29(1):19-35.
Google Scholar

Shaffir, William. 1991. “Conversion Experiences: Newcomers to and Defectors from Orthodox Judaism.” Pp. 173-202 in Tradition, Innovation, Conflict: Jewishness and Judaism in Contemporary Israel, edited by Z. Sobel and B. Beit Hallahmi. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Google Scholar

Shaffir, William. 1993. “Jewish Messianism Lubavitch Style: An Interim Report.” The Jewish Journal of Sociology 35(2):115-128.
Google Scholar

Shaffir, William. 1995a. “Boundaries and Self-Presentation among Hasidim: A Study in Identity Maintenance.” Pp. 31-68 in New World Hasidim: Ethnographic Studies Of Hasidic Jews in America, edited by J. Belcove-Shalin. New York: SUNY Press.
Google Scholar

Shaffir, William. 1995b. “When Prophecy Is Not Validated: Explaining the Unexpected in a Messianic Campaign.” The Jewish Journal of Sociology 37(2):119-136.
Google Scholar

Shaffir, William. 1998a. “Doing Ethnographic Research in Jewish Orthodox Communities: The Neglected Role of Sociability.” Pp. 48-64 in Doing Ethnographic Research: Fieldwork Settings, edited by S. Grills. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar

Shaffir, William. 1998b. “Still Separated From the Mainstream: A Hassidic Community Revisited.” The Jewish Journal of Sociology 39(1/2):46-62.
Google Scholar

Shaffir, William. 2000a. “Hassidim and the Rebbe: Some Initial Observations.” The Jewish Journal of Sociology 42(1/2):73-85.
Google Scholar

Shaffir, William. 2000b. “Movements in and out of Orthodo XJudaism: The Cases of Penitents and the Disaffected.” Pp. 269-285 in Joining and Leaving Religion: Research Perspectives, edited by Leslie J. Francis and Yaacov J. Katz. Trowbridge, Waltshire: Gracewing.
Google Scholar

Shaffir, William. 2001. “Fieldwork Among Hassidic Jews: Moral Challenges and Missed Opportunities.” The Jewish Journal of Sociology 43(1/2):53-69.
Google Scholar

Shaffir, William. 2002. “Outremont’s Hassidim and their Neighbours: An Eruv and its Repercussions.” The Jewish Journal of Sociology 44(1/2):56-71.
Google Scholar

Shaffir, William. 2004. “Secular Studies In A Hassidic Enclave: «What Do We Need It For?»” The Jewish Journal of Sociology 46(1/2):59-77.
Google Scholar

Shaffir, William. 2006. “The Renaissance of Hassidism.” The Jewish Journal of Sociology 48(1/2):69-74.
Google Scholar

Shaffir, William. 2007. “Hassidim Confronting Modernity.” The Jewish Journal of Sociology 49:5-35.
Google Scholar

Shepherd, Gordon. 1987. “The Social Construction of a Religious Prophecy.” Sociological Inquiry 57:394-414.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1987.tb00246.x

Simmons, J. L. 1964. “On Maintaining Deviant Belief Systems: A Case Study.” Social Problems 11(3):250-256.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/798723

Spangler, Sister Mary Michael. 1998. Aristotle on Teaching. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Google Scholar

Strauss, Anselm. 1993. Continual Permutations of Action. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Google Scholar

Van Zandt, David E. 1991. Living in the Children of God. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400862153

Zuckert, Catherine H. 1996. Postmodern Platos. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2013-01-31

How to Cite

Prus, R. (2013). Representing, Defending, and Questioning Religion: Pragmatist Sociological Motifs in Plato’s "Timaeus", "Phaedo", "Republic", and "Laws". Qualitative Sociology Review, 9(1), 6–42. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.09.1.01

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>