Gramatyka generatywna Noama Chomsky’ego a lingwistyka stosowana

Piotr Stalmaszczyk

doi:10.18778/0208-6077.33.10

Autor

Piotr Stalmaszczyk https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1407-7610

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6077.33.10

Abstrakt

The paper discusses recent developments in the Government-Binding model of generative grammar proposed by N. Chomsky, concentrating on the issue of Universal Grammar. Chomsky asks three questions about the status of knowledge of language: (1) What constitutes knowledge of language? (2) How is knowledge of language acquired? (3) How is knowledge of language put to use?

To know a language is to be in a specific mental state, knowledge of language is acquired through a rich and structured system of innate knowledge. This innate knowledge consists of highly modular systems of principles, which constitute Universal Grammar (UG). Within the Government-Binding framework UG is formalized as the lexicon and three levels of representation. Seven modules (subsystems of principles) are responsible for adequate derivations of well-formed sentences.

UG is responsible for the acquisition of language (LI); however, from the point of second language (L2) acquisition theory it is important to find out to what degree UG operates in the acquisition of L2. Recent inquiries into various phonological, morphological, syntactic and semantic processes suggest that UG may be crucial in L2 acquisition though almost certainly it is not the only mechanism involved.

Further studies dealing with principles and parameters across different languages are required to give a more complete picture of the relationship between UG and L2 acquisition. Results of such studies should be important and illuminating for both the theory of L2 acquisition and for the theory of generative grammar.

The paper provides an overview of recent publications devoted to Chomsky’s theory and discusses some of the more specific issues in the context of applied linguistics.

Pobrania

Brak dostępnych danych do wyświetlenia.

Bibliografia

Bobrowski, I. 1988, Gramatyka generatywno-transformacyjna (TG ) a uogólniona gramatyka struktur frazowych (GPSG), Wrocław: Ossolineum.
Google Scholar

Bobrowski, I. 1993, Językoznawstwo racjonalne. Z zagadnień teorii językoznawczej i metodologii opisów gramatycznych, Kraków: Polska Akademia Nauk, Instytut Języka Polskiego.
Google Scholar

Bolc, L, Mykowiecka, A. 1992, Wybrane metody formalnego zapisu składni, Warszawa: Akademicka Oficyna Wydawnicza RM.
Google Scholar

Borsley, B. 1991, Syntactic Theory, London: Edward Arnold.
Google Scholar

Broselow, E. 1988, Second Language Acquisition, [w:] F. Newmeyer, (red.), t. 3, s. 194–209.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621062.008

Burt, M. 1971, From Deep to Surface Structure, New York: Harper and Row.
Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1965, Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press (polskie tłumaczenie: Zagadnienia teorii składni, tł. I. Jakubczak, Wrocław: Ossolineum, 1982).
Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1979, Language and Responsability, Brighton: Harvester Press.
Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1980a, Rules and Representations, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00001515

Chomsky, N. 1980b, On Binding, „Linguistic Inquiry” 11, 1–46.
Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1981, Lectures on Government and Binding, Dordrecht: Foris.
Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1982, Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding, Cambridge, Mass.: МIT Press.
Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1986a, Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use, New York: Praeger.
Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1986b, Barriers, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1988, Language and Problems of Knowledge: The Managua Lectures, Cambridge, Mass.: M IT Press.
Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1989, Some Notes on Economy of Derivation and Representation, „MIT Working Papers in Linguistics” 10, 43-74.
Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1993, A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory, [w:] K. Hale, S. J. Keyser (red.), The View from Builiding 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honour of Sylvain Bromberger, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, Press.
Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1994, Bare Phrase Structure, „MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics" 5, April.
Google Scholar

Cook, V. J. 1988, Chomsky's Universal Grammar, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Google Scholar

Dakowska, M. 1995, Models of Language Use and Language Learning in the Theory of Language Didactics, Warszawa: Wydawnictwa UW.
Google Scholar

Dobryjanowicz, E. 1992, Wybrane metody analizy składniowej, Warszawa: Akademicka Oficyna Wydawnicza RM.
Google Scholar

Felix, S. 1987, Cognition and Language Growth, Dordrecht: Foris.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110871678

Flynn, S. 1988, Second Language Acquisition and Grammatical Theory, [w:] F. Newmeyer (red.), t. 2, s. 53–73.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621055.005

Frege, G. 1977, Funkcja i pojęcie (1891), [w:] Pisma semantyczne, U. B. Wolniewicz, Warszawa: PWN, s. 18–44.
Google Scholar

Freidin, R. (red.) 1991, Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Google Scholar

Freidin, R. 1992, Foundations of Generative Syntax, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Google Scholar

Gussmann, E. 1995, Licensing in Syntax and Phonology, PASE Studies and Monographs, vol. 1, Lublin: Wydawnictwo Folium.
Google Scholar

Haegeman, L. 1991, Introduction to Government and Binding, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Google Scholar

Hyams, N. 1986, Language Acquisition and the Theory of Parameters, Dordrecht: Reidel.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4638-5

Jackendoff, R. 1987, The Status of Thematic Relations in Linguistic Theory, „Linguistic Inquiry” 18, 369–411.
Google Scholar

Kardela, H. 1983, A Note on the pro-drop Parameter, „Lubelskie Materiały Neofilologiczne” , 255–261.
Google Scholar

Kardela, H. 1985, A Grammar of English and Polish Reflexives, Lublin: UMCS.
Google Scholar

Kardela, H. 1986, Wh-movement in English and Polish. Theoretical Implications, Lublin: UMCS.
Google Scholar

Kardela, H., Muszyński , Z. (red.), 1991, Noam Chomsky: Inspiracje i Perspektywy, Warszawa: Biblioteka Myśli Semiotycznej.
Google Scholar

Kasher, A. (red.) 1991, The Chomskyan Turn, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Google Scholar

Kean, M.-L., 1986, Core Issues in Transfer, (w:] E. Kellerman, M. Sharwood Smith (red.), s. 80–90.
Google Scholar

Kellerman, E., Sharwood Smith , M. (red.) 1986, Crosslinguistic Influence in Second language Acquisition, Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Google Scholar

Kurcz, I. 1992, Język, [w:] T. Tomaszewski (red.), s. 171–267.
Google Scholar

Lasnik, H., Uriagereka , J. 1988, A Course in GB Syntax, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Google Scholar

Lightfoot, D. 1991, How to Set Parameters. Arguments from Language Change, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Google Scholar

Mykowiecka, A. 1992, Metody generowania tekstów, Warszawa: Akademicka Oficyna Wydawnicza RM.
Google Scholar

Newmeyer, F. (red.), 1988, Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, t. 1–4, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621055.002

Ouhalla, J. 1994, Transformational Grammar, London: Edward Arnold.
Google Scholar

Pinker, S. 1989, Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Google Scholar

Pollock, J.-Y. 1989, Verb Movement, Universal Grammar, and the Study of IP, „Linguistic Inguiry” 20, 365–424.
Google Scholar

Radford, A. 1990, Syntactic Theory and the Acquisition of English Syntax, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Google Scholar

van Riemsdijk, H., Williams , E. 1986, Introduction to the Theory of Grammar, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Google Scholar

Rizzi, L. 1982, Issues in Italian Syntax, Dordrecht: Foris.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110883718

Rizzi, L. 1986, Null Objects in Italian and the Theory of pro, „Linguistic Inquiry" 17, 467–558.
Google Scholar

Romaine, S. 1988, Pidgin and Creole Languages, London: Longman.
Google Scholar

Rozwadowska, В. 1992, Thematic Constraints on Selected Constructions in English and Polish, Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.
Google Scholar

Schachter, J. 1988, Second Language Acquisition and its Relationship to Universal Grammar, „Applied Linguistics" 9, 219–235.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/9.3.219

Stalmaszczyk, P. 1991, Gramatyka uniwersalna Chomsky'ego – najnowsze tendencje i niektóre implikacje, [w:] H. Kardela , Z. Muszyński (red.), s. 139–156.
Google Scholar

Stalmaszczyk, P. 1992, The Structure of Thematic Relations in English, Łódź: EKORNO .
Google Scholar

Tomaszewski, T. (red.) 1992, Psychologia ogólna, t. 3, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Google Scholar

White, L. 1985, The pro-drop Parameter in Adult Second Language Acquisition, „Language Learning” 35, 47–62.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1985.tb01014.x

White, L. 1989, Universal Grammar and Second language Acquisition, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.1

Willim, E. 1989, On Word Order: A Government-Binding Study of English and Polish, Kraków: UJ.
Google Scholar

Zabrocki, W. 1990, Czy język jest wrodzony? Językoznawstwo Chomsky'ego a hipoteza natywizmu, Poznań: Wydawnictwa UAM.
Google Scholar