Value perception of the economic cultural capital of socialist-modernist dissonant heritage from the perspective of local authorities in Poland
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/2543-9421.09.03Keywords:
dissonant heritage, socialist-modernism, culture capital, willingness to pay, WTP, VRIO, sustainable developmentAbstract
The aim of the article is to identify the value of architectural resources from the cultural heritage of socialist-modernism as perceived by municipal officials responsible for spatial planning, cultural heritage, and urban development policy. The perception that those resources are valuable is a crucial factor in ensuring effective heritage protection, while also generating multiplier effects that stimulate socio-economic development, influence a sense of local identity, and contribute to the revitalization and aesthetic enhancement of urban spaces. The research presented focuses on specific sites, namely relatively new buildings, often unique from an architectural and urban planning perspective, but marked by the ‘stigma’ the challenging history of the Polish People’s Republic period. This distinctiveness may lead to ambivalence in their reception, hence the frequent use of the term ‘dissonant heritage’. This raises the question: do buildings that fall into this heritage category have developmental potential? The study’s findings indicate that, despite their problematic origins or often significant levels of physical deterioration, socialist-modernist structures are deeply rooted in the local environment. However, they are not being effectively utilized. The results presented form part of a larger study on conditions for strengthening the endogenous potential of cities based on the resources of socialist-modernist cultural heritage. The research utilized the VRIO model as well as a declared preference method known as willingness to pay (WTP).
References
Adamus, J., Przygodzki, Z. (2022). Ekonomiczna wartość przestrzeni publicznych. Kapitał, wycena, zarządzanie. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego. http://hdl.handle.net/11089/42088
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/8220-773-6
Álvarez-García, J., Maldonado-Erazo, C.P., de la Cruz Del Río-Rama, M., Castellano-Álvarez, F.J. (2019). Cultural heritage and tourism basis for regional development: Mapping of scientific coverage. Sustainability, 11(21), artykuł 6034. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216034
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216034
Baum, M. (2018). The 1974 urban planning norms in the shaping of green areas on the example of Białystok / Normatyw urbanistyczny z 1974 r. w kształtowaniu zieleni osiedlowej na przykładzie Białegostoku. Architektura Krajobrazu, 3, 38–49.
Google Scholar
Carson, R.T., Wilks, L., Imber, D. (1994). Valuing the preservation of Australia’s Kakadu conservation zone. Oxford Economic Papers, 46(supl. 1), 727–749. http://doi.org/10.1093/oep/46.Supplement_1.727
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/46.Supplement_1.727
Drápala, D. (2020). Social capital and safeguarding of intangible cultural heritage: Theoretical concepts of departure and the potential of further research. Slovenský národopis / Slovak Ethnology, 68(2), 122–135. https://doi.org/10.2478/se-2020-0007
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/se-2020-0007
European Commission. (b.r.). Zrównoważony rozwój i dziedzictwo kulturowe. https://culture.ec.europa.eu/pl/cultural-heritage/cultural-heritage-in-eu-policies/sustainability-and-culturalheritage
Google Scholar
Giliberto, F., Labadi, S. (2022). Harnessing cultural heritage for sustainable development: An analysis of three internationally funded projects in MENA countries. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 28(2), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2021.1950026
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2021.1950026
Grazuleviciute-Vileniske, I. (2006). Cultural heritage in the context of sustainable development. Aplinkos tyrimai, inžinerija ir vadyba / Environmental Research, Engineering and Management, 3(37), 74–79.
Google Scholar
Ibrahim, F.M.A. (2022). Cultural heritage and literature in the face of global challenges. Proceeding of International Seminar ECKLL X 2022, 10(1), 17–30. https://ejournal.unitomo.ac.id/index.php/eckll/article/view/5644
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25139/eckll.v10i1.5644
Kepczynska-Walczak, A., Walczak, B.M. (2015). Built heritage perception through representation of its atmosphere. Ambiances [online], 1. https://doi.org/10.4000/ambiances.640
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/ambiances.640
Kozioł, A., Trelka, M., Florjanowicz, P. (2013). Społeczno-gospodarcze oddziaływanie dziedzictwa kulturowego. Raport z badań społecznych. Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa. https://ksiegarnia.nid.pl/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Spoleczno-gospodarcze-oddzialywanie-dziedzictwa-kulturowego.Raport.pdf
Google Scholar
Legutko-Kobus, P. (2016). Dziedzictwo kulturowe jako czynnik rozwoju i specjalizacji regionów. Studia Komitetu Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania Kraju PAN, (170), 140–157. https://www.czasopisma.pan.pl/dlibra/publication/112666/edition/97932/content/dziedzictwo-kulturowe-jako-czynnik-rozwoju-i-specjalizacji-regionow-cultural-heritage-as-a-factor-in-development-and-specialization-of-regions-legutko-kobus-paulina
Google Scholar
Lu, Y., Ahmad, Y. (2023). Heritage protection perspective of sustainable development of traditional villages in Guangxi, China. Sustainability, 15(4), artykuł 3387. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043387
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043387
Mude, H., Belachew, A., Bersisa, M. (2020). Non-market valuation of Tiya Megalithic World Cultural Heritage of Ethiopia, application of travel cost and contingent valuation methods. American Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics, 5(3), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajere.20200503.13
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajere.20200503.13
Murzyn-Kupisz, M. (2010). Barbarzyńca w ogrodzie? Dziedzictwo kulturowe widziane z perspektywy ekonomii. Zarządzanie Publiczne, 3(13), 19–32.
Google Scholar
Murzyn-Kupisz, M., Działek, J. (2013). Cultural heritage in building and enhancing social capital. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 3(1), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1108/20441261311317392
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/20441261311317392
Navrud, S. (2005). Valuing cultural heritage – lessons learned. W: C.A. Brebbia i A. Torpiano (red.), Structural studies, repairs and maintenance of heritage architecture IX (s. 95–100). WIT Press. https://www.witpress.com/Secure/elibrary/papers/STR05/STR05010FU.pdf
Google Scholar
Nowak, A.W. (2021, 29 lipca). Oskard ugładzony. Wielkopolska. Kultura u podstaw. https://kulturaupodstaw.pl/oskard-ugladzony/
Google Scholar
Panzera, E. (2022). Cultural heritage and territorial identity: Synergies and development impact on European regions. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94468-1
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94468-1
Przygodzki, Z., Waleski, I. (2021). Szacowanie wartości trudnego dziedzictwa kulturowego. Wycena dóbr nierynkowych metodą deklarowanych preferencji na przykładzie modernistycznego kompleksu biurowo handlowego. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica, 1(352), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.352.01
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.352.01
Šmid Hribar, M., Bole, D., Pipan, P. (2015). Sustainable heritage management: Social, economic and other potentials of culture in local development. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 188, 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.344
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.344
Sokołowicz, M.E. (2013). Zagadnienie bliskości w badaniach nad rozwojem terytorialnym. Podejście instytucjonalne. W: A. Nowakowska (red.), Zrozumieć terytorium. Idea i praktyka (s. 59–89). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego. https://doi.org/10.18778/7525-954-4.04
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/7525-954-4.04
Sokołowicz, M.E. (2022). Wartościowanie niejednoznacznego dziedzictwa modernizmu w mieście na przykładzie stacji kolejowej Warszawa Ochota. Studia Regionalne i Lokalne, 87(1), 86–107. https://studreg.uw.edu.pl/dane/web_sril_files/1819/2022_1_sokolowicz.pdf
Google Scholar
Sokołowicz, M.E., Nowakowska, A., Ciarkowski, B. (2023). The ambiguous legacy of socialist modernist architecture in Central and Eastern Europe. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003299172
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003299172
Stepanchuk, A., Gafurova, S., Latypova, M. (2020). “Genius loci” as a resource for the development of historical areas of the city. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 890, artykuł 012013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/890/1/012013
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/890/1/012013
Szafrańska, E. (2016). Wielkie osiedla mieszkaniowe w mieście postsocjalistycznym. Geneza, rozwój, przemiany, percepcja. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego. http://hdl.handle.net/11089/39624
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/8088-210-2
Theodora, Y. (2020). Cultural heritage as a means for local development in Mediterranean historic cities – the need for an urban policy. Heritage, 3(2), 152–175. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage3020010
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage3020010
Throsby, D. (2012). Heritage economics: A conceptual framework. W: G. Licciardi i R. Amirtahmasebi (red.), The economics of uniqueness: Investing in historic city cores and cultural heritage assets for sustainable development (s. 45–74). The World Bank. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/727651468340186831/pdf/730720PUB0EPI001200pub0date01001012.pdf
Google Scholar
Uchwała nr 239 Rady Ministrów z dnia 13 grudnia 2011 r. w sprawie przyjęcia Koncepcji Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania Kraju 2030. MP 2012, poz. 252, 188.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
