The concept of ”rural smart development” – a challenge for rural planning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-1117.31.01Keywords:
Rural areas, smart development, strategic planningAbstract
The development of rural areas is entering a stage where we are increasingly using the opportunities provided by technology. Its essence is the use of information and knowledge to introduce social and economic innovations. This is important because in the process of overcoming the peripherality of rural regions, the role of technological innovations, especially new ways of communication, is increasingly recognized. The implementation of smart development strategies, including new approaches of rural development, is one of the key challenges facing European and national institutions that are responsible for finding solutions to prevent social marginalization processes. The article discusses the genesis of the concept of smart development and its rural context. The processes of social changes with which technological changes are to be combined are also defined.
References
Andersson M., Klaesson J., Larsson J.P., 2016, How local are spatial density externalities? Neighbourhood effects in agglomeration economies, „Regional Studies”, 50: 1082–1095.
Google Scholar
Bański J., 2006, Geografia polskiej wsi, Państwowe Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Barca F., 2009, An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy: a Place-based Approach to Meeting European Challenges and Expectations, EERI Research Paper Series 06/2008, Economics and Econometrics Research Institute (EERI), Brussels.
Google Scholar
Bilbao-Osorio B., Rodríguez-Pose A., 2004, From R&D to innovation and economic growth in the EU, „Growth Change”, 35 (4): 434–455.
Google Scholar
Buttimer A., 1990, Charyzmat i kontekst: wyzwanie, „Przegląd Zagranicznej Literatury Geograficznej”, 4: 11–28 (tłum. z jęz. ang. I. Sagan: Buttimer A., 1978, Charism and Context: The Challenge of: “La géographie humaine”, [w:] Ley D., Samuels M. (red.), Humanistic Geography, Maaraufa Press, Chicago: 58–76.
Google Scholar
Czapiewski K.Ł., 2010, Koncepcja wiejskich obszarów sukcesu społeczno-gospodarczego i ich rozpoznanie w województwie mazowieckim, „Studia Obszarów Wiejskich”, 22, IGiPZ PAN, KOW PTG, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
European Commission, 2010, Europe 2020: a European Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth, European Commission, Brussels.
Google Scholar
Fagerberg J., Verspagen B., Caniéls M., 1997, Technology, growth and unemployment across European regions, „Regional Studies”, 31 (5): 457–466.
Google Scholar
Foray D., 2009, Understanding “smart specialisation”, [w:] Pontikakis D., Kyriakou D., van Bavel R. (red.), The Question of R & D Specialisation. Perspectives and Policy Implications, European Communities, Luxembourg: 14–26.
Google Scholar
Foray D., David P.A., Hall B.H., 2011, Smart Specialisation: from Academic Idea to Political Instrument, the Surprising Career of a Concept and the Difficulties Involved in its Implementation, MTEI Working Paper 2011-001, Management of Technology&Entrepreneurship Institute, Lausanne.
Google Scholar
Grosse T.G., 2002, Przegląd koncepcji teoretycznych rozwoju regionalnego, „Studia Regionalne i Lokalne”, 1 (8): 25–48.
Google Scholar
Grzeszczak J., 2010, Gentryfikacja osadnictwa, Monografie, 11, IGiPZ PAN, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Koster H.R.A., van Ommeren J., Rietveld P., 2014, Is the sky the limit? High-rise buildings and office rents, „Journal of Economic Geography”, 14 (1): 125–153.
Google Scholar
McCann P., Ortega-Argilés R., 2015, Smart specialization, regional growth and applications to European Union cohesion policy, „Regional Studies”, 49: 1291–1302.
Google Scholar
Naldi L., Nilsson P., Westlund H., Wixe S., 2015, What is smart rural development, „Journal of Rural Studies”, 40: 90–101.
Google Scholar
Nooteboom B., 2000, Learning and Innovation in Organizations and Economies, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Google Scholar
Philips M., 2005, Differential Productions of Rural Gentrifications: Illustrations from North and South Norfolk, „Geoforum”, 36: 477–494.
Google Scholar
Rauch J.E., 1993, Productivity gains from geographic concentration of human capital: evidence from the cities, „Journal of Urban Economics”, 34 (3): 380–400.
Google Scholar
Romer P.M., 1990, Endogenous technological change, „Journal of Political Economy”, 98 (5): 71–102.
Google Scholar
Wójcik M., 2011, Wiejski obszar peryferyjny w koncepcjach geograficznych, „Studia Obszarów Wiejskich”, 26: 19–34.
Google Scholar