Tradycyjne szkoły urbomorfologii a nowe podejścia do analizy miejskich form przestrzennych

Autor

  • Magdalena Deptuła Uniwersytet Łódzki, Wydział Nauk Geograficznych, Katedra Geografii Politycznej i Studiów Regionalnych

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-1117.25.02

Słowa kluczowe:

Morfologia miast, geografia historyczna, architektura, filozofia, space syntax

Abstrakt

Artykuł jest próbą syntezy i usystematyzowania dotychczasowego dorobku w dziedzinie urbomorfologii. Opiera się na przeglądzie najważniejszych, tradycyjnych oraz najbardziej aktualnych tendencji w badaniach prowadzonych na tym polu. W pracy dokonano charakterystyki i porównania najważniejszych szkół europejskich zorientowanych na problematykę morfologii miast, wypracowanych na gruncie geografii i architektury. W tym celu prześledzono rozwój badań morfologicznych wywodzących się z trzech odmiennych tradycji: niemieckiej, brytyjskiej i włoskiej oraz zestawiono je z nowoczesnymi technikami analizy miejskich form przestrzennych, ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem space syntax (metody syntatyki przestrzeni). Artykuł ma na celu wskazać różnice w punkcie ciężkości badań morfologicznych prowadzonych w różnych obszarach badawczych, jednocześnie zaakcentować ich komplementarny potencjał poprzez prezentację różnych podejść teoretycznych i metodologicznych do struktur miejskich.

Bibliografia

Baker N.T., Slater T.R., 1992, Morphological regions in British medieval towns, [in:] Whitehand J.W.R., Larkham P.J. (eds), Urban landscapes: international perspectives, Routledge, London, s. 43–68.
Google Scholar

Berghauster Pont M., Haupt P., 2010, Spacematrix: space, density and urban form, Nether­lands Architecture Institute, Amsterdam.
Google Scholar

Bobek H., 1927, Grundfragen der Stadtgeographie, „Geographischer Anzeiger”, 28 (7), s. 213–24.
Google Scholar

Bollati R., 1980, Metodo di lettura delle strutture urbane, attraverso le fasi evolutive, Istituto Universitario Statale di Architettura, Reggio Calabria.
Google Scholar

Caniggia G., 1963, Lettura di una città: Como, Centro Studi di Storia Urbanistica, Roma.
Google Scholar

Caniggia G., Maffei G.L., 1978, Lettura dell’edilizia di base, Marsilio Editori, Padova.
Google Scholar

Caniggia G., Maffei G.L., 1979, Compositione architettonica e tipologia edilizia. I Lettu­ra dell’edilizia di base, Marsilio, Venezia.
Google Scholar

Caniggia G., Maffei G.L., 1981, Strutture dello spazioantropico, Alinea, Firenze.
Google Scholar

Caniggia G., Maffei G.L., 2001, Architectural composition and building typology: inter­preting basic building, Alinea, Firenze.
Google Scholar

Cataldi G., 2003, From Muratori to Caniggia: the origins and development of the Italian school of design typology, „Urban Morphology” 7 (1), s. 19–34.
Google Scholar

Cataldi G., Maffei G.L., Vaccaro P., 2002, Saverio Muratori and the Italian school of planning typology, „Urban Morphology”, 6 (1), s. 3–14.
Google Scholar

Cho H., 2011, Future Korean Urban Transformation as the result of Integration of Urban Administrative Districts, The Asian Conference on Asian Studies 2011, Conference Proceedings, International Academic Forum, s. 117–131.
Google Scholar

Ciołkosz-Styk A., 2013, Zastosowanie metody cyfrowego przetwarzania obrazów do wyznaczania gęstości graficznej opracowań kartograficznych na przykładzie planów miast, „Archiwum Fotogrametrii, Kartografii i Teledetekcji”, 25, s. 55–66.
Google Scholar

Controy-Dalton R., Dalton N., 2007, Applying Depth Decay Functions to Space Syntax Network Graphs, (Proceedings) Sixth International Space Syntax Symposium.
Google Scholar

Conzen M.P., 2010, The elusive common denominator in understanding urban form, „Ur­ban Morphology”, 14, s. 55–58.
Google Scholar

Conzen M.R.G., 1960, Alnwick, Northumberland; a Study in Town-Plan Analysis, Publi­cation 27, Institute of British Geographers, London.
Google Scholar

Conzen M.R.G., 1962, The plan analysis of an English city centre, [in:] Norborg K. (eds.), Proceedings of the IGU Symposium in Urban Geography, Gleerup, Lund, s. 383–414.
Google Scholar

Conzen M.R.G., 1968, The use of towns plans in the study of urban history, [in:] Doys H.J. (eds.), The study of urban history, London, s. 113–130.
Google Scholar

Dara-Abrams D., 2009, Extracting Cognitively Relevant Measures from Environmental Models, [in:] Koch D., Steen J. (eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Space Syn­tax Symposium, Stockholm.
Google Scholar

Dörries H., 1925, Die Städte im oberen Leinetal, Göttingen, Northeim und Einbeck. Ein Beitrag zur Landeskunde Niedersachsens und zur Methodik der Stadtgeographie, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen.
Google Scholar

Geisler W., 1924, Die deutsche Stadt. Ein Beitrag zur Morphologie der Kulturlandschaft, „Forschungen zur deutschen Landes und Volkskunde”,22 (5), Engelhorn, Stuttgart.
Google Scholar

Giannini A., 1980, L’individuo territoriale, Istituto di Progettazione Architettonica, Genova.
Google Scholar

Gil J., Beirão J.N., Montenegro N., Duarte J., 2012, On the discovery of urban typologies: data mining the many dimensions of urban form, „Urban Morphology”, 16, s. 27–40.
Google Scholar

Giovannoni G., 1930, Vecchie citta ed edilizia nuova, Unione Tipografico-Editrice Tori­nese, Torino.
Google Scholar

Griffiths S., 2009, Persistence and Change in the Spatio-temporal Description of Sheffield Parish 1770–1910, [in:] Koch D., Marcus L., Steen J. (eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Space Syntax Symposium, Stockholm, KTH Royal Institute of Techno­logy, 37, s. 1–15.
Google Scholar

Griffiths S., 2012, The use of Space Syntax in Historical Research: current practice and future possibilities, [in:] Greene M., Reyes J., Castro A. (eds.), Proceedings: Eight International Space Syntax Symposium, Santiago de Chile.
Google Scholar

Griffiths S., Jones C., Vaughan L., Haklay M., 2010, The persistence of suburban cen­tres in Greater London: combining Conzenian and space syntax approaches, „Urban Morphology”, 14 (2), s. 85–99.
Google Scholar

Hanna S., 2009, Spectral comparison of large urban graphs, [in:] Koch D., Marcus L., Steen J. (eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Space Syntax Symposium, Stock­holm, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 39, s. 1–11.
Google Scholar

Hassinger H., 1916, Kulturhistorischer Atlas der K.K. Reichshaupt- und Residenzstadt Wien, und Verzeichnis der erhaltenswerten historischen Kunst- und Naturdenkmale des Wiener Stadtbildes, „Österreichische Kunsttopographie”, 15, Schroll, Wien.
Google Scholar

Heineberg H., 2007, German geographical urban morphology in an international and interdisciplinary framework, „Urban Morphology”, 11 (1), s. 5–24.
Google Scholar

Hillier B., 1996, Space is the machine: a configurational theory of architecture, Cambrid­ge University Press, Cambridge.
Google Scholar

Hillier B., 1999, Centrality as a process: accounting for attraction inequalities in defor­med grids, „Urban Design International”, 4 (3–4), s. 107–127.
Google Scholar

Hillier B., Hanson J., 1984, The social logic of space, Cambridge University Press, Camb­ridge.
Google Scholar

Hillier B., Hanson J., Graham H., 1987, Ideas are in things: an application of the space syntax method to discovering house genotypes, „Environment and Planning B”, 14, s. 363–385.
Google Scholar

Hoek J. van den, 2009, The Mixed-use Index as planning tool for new towns in the 21st Century, [in:] Stolk E., Brömmelstroet M.T. (eds.), New towns for the 21st century: the planned vs the unplanned city, SUN Architecture, Amsterdam, s. 198–207.
Google Scholar

Jiang B., Claramunt C., Klarqvist B., 2000, Integration of space syntax into GIS for mo­deling urban space, „International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoin­formation”, 2, s. 161–171.
Google Scholar

Jiang B., Claramunt C., 2002, Integration of Space Syntax into GIS: New Perspectives for Urban Morphology, „Transactions in GIS”, 6 (3), s. 295.
Google Scholar

Karimi K., 2000, Urban conservation and spatial transformation: preserving the frag­ments or maintaining the ‘spatial spirit’, „Urban Design International”, 5, s. 221–231.
Google Scholar

Kigawa T., Furuyama M., 2005, Kyoto: A morphological cycle between a city of rituals and a city of games, Proceedings 5th International Space Syntax Symposium, Delft, TU Delft, Faculty of Architecture, s. 697–713.
Google Scholar

Koter M., Kulesza M., 2007, Morfologia miast – stan i tendencje rozwoju, [w:] Jażdżew­ska I. (red.), Polska geografia osadnictwa. Dotychczasowy dorobek. Program badań, XX Konwersatorium Wiedzy o Mieście, Katedra Geografii Miast i Turyzmu UŁ, Łódź, s. 303–314.
Google Scholar

Koter M., Kulesza M., 2008, Zastosowanie metod conzenowskich w polskich badaniach morfologii miast, [w:] Kulesza M. (red.), Czas i przestrzeń w naukach geograficznych. Wybrane problemy geografii historycznej, UŁ, Łódź, s. 257–272.
Google Scholar

Larkham P.J., 1996, Conservation and the city, Routledge, London.
Google Scholar

Letesson, Q., 2010, Du phénotype au génotype: Analyse de la syntaxe spatiale en architec­ture minoenne, Published PhD thesis, University of Louvain Press.
Google Scholar

Lilley K.D., 1999, Urban landscapes and the cultural politics of territorial control in Anglo-Norman England, „Landscapes Research”, 24, s. 5–23.
Google Scholar

Lilley K.D., 2000, Mapping the medieval city: plan analysis and urban history, „Urban History”, 27, s. 5–30.
Google Scholar

Marcus L., 2010, Spatial capital and how to measure it: a proposal for an extension of space syntax into a more general urban morphology, „Journal of Space Syntax”, 1, s. 30–40.
Google Scholar

Maretto M., 1980, Realtà naturale e realtà della costruita, Uniedit, Firenze.
Google Scholar

Maretto M., 2013, Severio Muratori: towards a morphological school of urban design, „Urban Morphology”, 17 (2), s. 93–106.
Google Scholar

Martiny R., 1928, Die Grundrißgestaltung der deutsche Siedlungen, Petermanns Mitte­ilungen, „Ergänzungsheft”, 197, Perthes, Gotha.
Google Scholar

Marzot N., 2002, The study of urban form in Italy, „Urban Morphology”, 6 (2), s. 59–73.
Google Scholar

Medeiros V., Holanda F., Trigueiro E., 2003, From Compact Colonial Villages to Sparse Metropolis, Proceedings, 4th International Space Syntax Symposium, UCL, London, s. 12.1–12.16.
Google Scholar

Medeiros V., Holanda F., 2007, Structure and size: Brazilian cities in an urban configura­tional world scenario, Proceedings 6th International Space Syntax Symposium Istan­bul, Istanbul Technical University Faculty of Architecture, 029.01–12.
Google Scholar

Muratori S., 1950, I caratteri degli edifici nello studio dell’architettura, Instituto Univer­sitario di Architettura, Venezia.
Google Scholar

Muratori S., 1960, Studi per una operante storia urbana di Venezia, Instituto poligrafico dello Stato, Libreria dello Stato.
Google Scholar

Muratori S., 1978, Metodologia del sistema realtà-autocoscienza, Centro Studi di Storia Urbanistica, Roma.
Google Scholar

O’Sullivan D., 2000, Graph-based cellular automation models of urban spatial processes, University College London, University of London, London.
Google Scholar

Oliveira V., 2013a, The study of urban form: reflections on national reviews, „Urban Morphology”, 17 (2), s. 85–92.
Google Scholar

Oliveira V., 2013b, Morpho: a methodology for assessing urban form, „Urban Morpho­logy”, 14, s. 5–20.
Google Scholar

Osmond P., 2010, The urban structural unit: towards a descriptive framework to support urban analysis and planning, „Urban Morphology”, 14, s. 5–20.
Google Scholar

Pagano G., Daniel G., 1936, Architettura rurale italiana, Ulrico Hoepli Editore, Milano.
Google Scholar

Pinho P., Oliveira V., 2009a, Combining different methodological approaches to analyze the Oporto Metropolitan Area, [in:] Koch D., Marcus L., Steen J. (eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Space Syntax Symposium, Stockholm, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 88, s. 1–13.
Google Scholar

Pinho P., Oliveira V., 2009b, Cartographic analysis in urban morphology, „Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design”, 36, s. 107–127.
Google Scholar

Ratzel F., 1903, Die geographische Lage der großen Städte Großstadt, „Jahrbuch der Gehe-Stiftung”, 9, v. Zahn & Jaensch, Dresden.
Google Scholar

Schlüter O., 1899a, Bemerkungen zur Siedlungsgeographie, „Geographische Zeitschrift”, 5, s. 65–84.
Google Scholar

Schlüter O., 1899b, Über den Grundriß der Städte, „Zeitschrift der Gesellschaft für Erd­kunde zu Berlin”, 34, s. 446–462.
Google Scholar

Schöller P., 1953, Aufgaben und Probleme der Stadtgeographie, „Erdkunde”, 7 (3), s. 161–184.
Google Scholar

Serra M., Pinho P., 2011, Dynamics of periurban spatial structures: investigating diffe­rentiated patterns of change on Oporto’s urban fringe, „Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design”, 38, s. 359–382.
Google Scholar

Shpuza E., 2009, Evolution of Street Networks in Adriatic and Ionian Coastal Cities 1769–2007, [in:] Koch D., Marcus L., Steen J. (eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Internatio­nal Space Syntax Symposium, Stockholm, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 101, s. 1–15.
Google Scholar

Slater T.R., 1987, Ideal and reality in English episcopal medieval town planning, Tran­sactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series 12, s. 191–203.
Google Scholar

Stanilov K., 2010, Brigding the gap between urban morphology and urban modeling, „Urban Morphology”, 14, s. 123–124.
Google Scholar

Ståhle A., 2012, Place Syntax Tool (PST), [in:] Hull A., Silva C., Bertolini L. (eds.), Ac­cessibility Instruments for Planning Practice, COST Office, s. 173–178.
Google Scholar

Szmytkie R., 2009, Miasta-zlepieńce na Śląsku Dolnym i Opolskim, Rozprawy Naukowe Instytutu Geografii i Rozwoju Regionalnego Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, 6, Uni­wersytet Wrocławski, Wrocław.
Google Scholar

Szmytkie R., 2014, Metody analizy morfologii i fizjonomii jednostek osadniczych, Roz­prawy Naukowe Instytutu Geografii i Rozwoju Regionalnego, 35, Uniwersytet Wroc­ławski, Wrocław.
Google Scholar

Thaler U., 2005, Narrative and Syntax: new perspectives on the Late Bronze Age palace of Pylos, Greece, Proceedings 5th International Space Syntax Symposium, Delft, TU Delft, Faculty of Architecture, s. 324–339.
Google Scholar

Whitehand J.W.R., 1967, Fringe belts: a neglected aspect of urban geography, „Tran­sactions”, 41, Institute of British Geographers, s. 223–233.
Google Scholar

Whitehand J.W.R., 1972, Building cycles and the spatial pattern of urban growth, „Tran­sactions”, 56, Institute of British Geographers, s. 39–55.
Google Scholar

Whitehand J.W.R., 1981, Conzenian ideas: extention and development, [in:] Whitehand J.W.R. (eds.), The urban landscape: historical development and management, Papers by M.R.G. Conzen, Institute of British Geographers. Special Publication, 13, Acade­mic Press, London.
Google Scholar

Whitehand, J.W.R., 1988, Urban fringe belts: development of an idea, „Planning Perspec­tives”, 3, s. 47–58.
Google Scholar

Whitehand J.W.R., 1992, The making of the Urban landscape, Institute of British Geo­graphers, Special Publication, 26, Blackwell, Oxford.
Google Scholar

Whitehand J.W.R., 1994, Development cycles and urban landscapes, „Geography”, 79, s. 3–17.
Google Scholar

Whitehand J.W.R., 2003, Suburban residential building form: a historio-geographical approach, [in:] Bischoff C.A., Krajewski C. (eds.), Beiträge zur geographischen Stadt- und Regionalforschung, 46, Institut für Geographie, Münster, s. 165–174.
Google Scholar

Ye Y., Nes van A., 2014, Quantitative tools in urban morphology: combining space syn­tax, spacematrix and mixed-use index in GIS framework, „Urban Morphology”, 18 (2), s. 98–118.
Google Scholar

Pobrania

Opublikowane

2016-09-30

Jak cytować

Deptuła, M. (2016). Tradycyjne szkoły urbomorfologii a nowe podejścia do analizy miejskich form przestrzennych. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Geographica Socio-Oeconomica, (25), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-1117.25.02