Subnational actors in the relations between China and Central and Eastern European countries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1427-9657.08.10Słowa kluczowe:
China-CEE Relations, Local Government, China-Poland RelationsAbstrakt
While much discussion centres on China’s engagement with Central and Eastern European countries, few studies investigate the role of subnational actors in the relations between the two sides. This paper brings China’s cooperation with Central and Eastern European (CEECs) countries, centred around what is popularly known as the “16 + 1” mechanism. It aims to unravel the link between local governments and the “16 + 1” cooperation mechanism. Local governments’ external cooperation is a new attempt in China’s diplomatic layout. It argues that the exchanges between local governments are a useful supplement to the in-depth cooperation between the two sides, and the cooperation between the two sides has formed a relatively stable pattern. At present, it has entered the stage of an in-depth integration focusing on optimization and upgrading. The further development of local cooperation mainly depends on whether it can play a sufficient leading role in the economic development of China and the countries of Central and Eastern Europe.
Bibliografia
Blatter, J., Kreutzer, M., Rentl, M., Thiele, J. 2008. The Foreign Relations of European Regions: Competencies and Strategies. West European Politics 31(3), pp. 464–490.
Google Scholar
Casarini, N. 2015. China’s Rebalancing towards Europe. The International Spectator 50(3), pp. 122–129.
Google Scholar
Chen, S.Y. 2019. Status Quo and Problems of Sino-Polish Humanities Exchange under the Framework of “17+1 Cooperation”. 17+1 Think Tanks Network Research Report (6).
Google Scholar
Chen, Z. 2001. Subnational Governments and Foreign Affairs. Beijing: China Changcheng Press.
Google Scholar
Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 2013. The Bucharest Guidelines for Cooperation between China and Central and Eastern European Countries.
Google Scholar
Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 2014. The Belgrade Guidelines for Cooperation between China and Central and Eastern European Countries.
Google Scholar
Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 2015. The Suzhou Guidelines for Cooperation between China and Central and Eastern European Countries.
Google Scholar
Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 2016. The Riga Guidelines for Cooperation between China and Central and Eastern European Countries.
Google Scholar
Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 2017. The Budapest Guidelines for Cooperation between China and Central and Eastern European Countries.
Google Scholar
Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 2018. The Sofia Guidelines for Cooperation between China and Central and Eastern European Countries.
Google Scholar
Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 2019. The Dubrovnik Guidelines for Cooperation between China and Central and Eastern European Countries.
Google Scholar
Coll, F.R. 2010. Foreign Policy of Constituents Units in A Globalized World. In Foreign Policy of Constituent’s Units at the Beginning of 21st Century. Institut d’Estudis Autonòmics, pp. 11–13.
Google Scholar
Czerep, J. 2017. Influence of the Łódź-Chengdu Railway on the Perception of 16+1 in Poland, Working Paper (5). China-CEE Institute.
Google Scholar
Frąk, M. 2017. Drugi „sukces” Macierewicza. Chińczycy odchodzą z Łodzi. Gazeta Wyborcza, http://lodz.wyborcza.pl/lodz/1,35153,21204457,drugi-sukces-macierewicza-chinczycy-odchodza-z-lodzi.html (accessed 13.09.2019).
Google Scholar
Góralczyk, B. 2017. China’s interests in Central and Eastern Europe: Enter the Dragon. European View 16(1), pp. 153–162.
Google Scholar
Grajewski, P.Ż. 2017. Polish foreign policy 2015–2017. Poland.pl, https://poland.pl/politics/opinions/polish-foreign-policy-2015-2017/ (accessed 1.01.2018).
Google Scholar
Grewal, D.S. 2008. Network Power: The Social Dynamics of Globalization. Yale: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar
Huang, P.. Liu, Z.K. 2018. The Cooperation Between China and Central & Eastern European Countries (16+1) 2012–2017. Social Sciences Academic Press (China).
Google Scholar
Jakóbowski, J., Popławski, K., Kaczmarski, M. 2018. The Silk Railroad. The EU-China Rail Connections: Background, Actors, Interests. Warszawa: Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich.
Google Scholar
Janduła, M. 2016. Hatrans: Przetarliśmy szlak dla pociągów Chiny – Polska. Rynek Kolejowy, http://www.rynek-kolejowy.pl/wiadomosci/hatrans-przetarlismy-szlak-dla-pociagow-chiny--polska-79567.html (accessed 5.08.2019).
Google Scholar
Kamiński, T. 2019. What are the Factors Behind the Successful EU-China Cooperation on the Subnational Level? Case Study of the Lodzkie Region in Poland. Asia Europe Journal 17(2), pp. 227–242.
Google Scholar
Kamiński, T., Skorupska, A., Szczudlik, J. 2019. The Subnational Dimension of EU-China Relations, PISM Report, p. 32.
Google Scholar
Kowalski, B. 2017. China’s Foreign Policy Towards Central and Eastern Europe: The “16+1” Format in the South-South Cooperation Perspective, Cases of the Czech Republic and Hungary. Cambridge Journal of Eurasian Studies, 1, 7R65ZH.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22261/7R65ZH
Liu, Z. 2017. Europe and the “Belt and Road Initiative”: Responses and Risks. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.
Google Scholar
Maoz, Z. 2010. Networks of Nations: The Evolution, Structure, and Impact of International Networks, 1816–2001 (Vol. 32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511762659
Mierzejewski, D. 2017. Between Central and Local Interdependence: Dimensions of Poland’s Relations with China. In: China’s Relations with Central and Eastern Europe from ‘Old Comrades’ to New Partners. New York and Oxford: Routledge, pp. 154–169.
Google Scholar
Nagel, C.J. 2010. Foreign policy: The Case of the German Länder. In: F. Requejo (ed.). Foreign Policy of Constituent Units at the Beginning of the 21st Century. Barcelona, Spain: Institut d’Estudis Autonòmics.
Google Scholar
Pietrasiak, M., Bywalec, G., Kaminski, T., Mierzejewski, D., Słowikowski, M. 2018. Paradiplomacy in Asia. Case Studies of China, India and Russia. Case Studies of China, India and Russia. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
Google Scholar
Shepard, W. 2016. How Those China-Europe ‘Silk Road’ Trains First Began. Forbes, https://www.forbes.com/sites/wadeshepard/2016/06/29/the-story-of-how-those-china-europe-silk-road-trains-first-began/#68f70ec81734 (accessed 25.06.2019).
Google Scholar
Song, W. ed. 2017. China’s Relations with Central and Eastern Europe: From “Old Comrades” to New Partners. New York and Oxford: Routledge.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315226644
Statistical Bureau of Sichuan. Sichuan Provincial People’s Government Work Report 2018.
Google Scholar
Szczudlik, J. 2015. “One Belt, One Road”: Mapping China’s New Diplomatic Strategy. PISM Bulletin 67, pp. 1–2.
Google Scholar
Tatham, M. 2016. With, Without, or Against the State? How European Regions Play the Brussels Game. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198758624.001.0001
Tiezzi, S.T. 2016. China’s Xi Brings “Belt and Road” to Serbia, Poland. The Diplomat. http://thediplomat.com/2016/06/chinas-xi-brings-belt-and-road-to-serbia-poland (accessed 30.04.2019).
Google Scholar
Van der Pluijm, R., Melissen, J. 2007. City Diplomacy: The Expanding Role of Cities in International Politics. Netherlands Institute of International Relations Clingendael.
Google Scholar
Wang, J.S. 2012. “Marching Westwards”: The Rebalancing of China’s Geostrategy. International and Strategic Studies Report (Peking University) 73, pp. 1–4.
Google Scholar
Wang, Y. 2016. Ministry of Foreign Affairs Holds Event Presenting Sichuan Province, Ministry of Foreign Affairs (China).
Google Scholar
Wojciechowski, P. 2017. Nowy Jedwabny Szlak łączy Europę z Dalekim Wschodem.
Google Scholar
Gazeta Wyborcza, http://trojmiasto.wyborcza.pl/trojmiasto/7,35612,21417281,nowy-jedwabny-szlak-laczy-europe-z-dalekim-wschodem.html (accessed 13.09.2019).
Google Scholar
World Bank, 2018. The World Bank Annual Report.
Google Scholar
Yuan, H. 2018. China’s Strategic Narrative and Challenges: The Case of Poland. Stosunki Międzynarodowe 54(2), pp. 121–141.
Google Scholar
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.