Ideology in Modern Russian Constitutional Practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.89.10Słowa kluczowe:
Constitutional court, constitutional reasoning, formalism, legal positivism, Russian constitutionAbstrakt
The article focuses on Russian constitutional ideology with overview of its historical preconditions and analysis of recent significant cases of the Russian Constitutional Court. There is a discussion of gay activist Alekseyev’s case and “foreign agents’ law” case in constitutional practice as most significant examples of positivistic way of legal reasoning. The paper argues that legal positivism through its form – legal formalism is the main ideology in the modern constitutional practice in Russia. This ideology is based on the assumption that constitutional justice can find social truth. German positivistic and Soviet Marxist views have strongly determined the modern Russian constitutional discourse.
Pobrania
Bibliografia
Anichkin, Yevgeny. 2010. Preobrazovanie Konstitutsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii i razvitie konstitutsionnogo zakonodatel’stva v kontse XX – nachale XXI vekov: monografiya. Barnaul: Altay State University Pub.
Google Scholar
Baudoin, Marie-Elisabeth. 2006. “Is the Constitutional Court the Last Bastion in Russia against the Threat of Authoritarianism?” Europe-Asia Studies 58: 679–699.
Google Scholar
Bowring, Bill. 2013. Law, Rights and Ideology in Russia. Landmarks in the Destiny of a Great Power. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Butler, William. 1991. Basic Documents on the Soviet Legal System. 2nd ed. New York: Oceana Pubns.
Google Scholar
Dolzhikov, Alexey. 2012. “The European Court of Human Rights on the Principle of Proportionality in ‘Russian’ Cases”. TEISE 82: 215–224.
Google Scholar
Ebzeyev, Boris. 2000. Kommentarii k postanovleniyam Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Volume 1. Moscow: Yurist.
Google Scholar
Fogelklou, Anders. 2003. “Constitutionalism and the Presidency in the Russian Federation”. International Sociology 18: 181–198.
Google Scholar
Frankenberg, Gunter. 2006. “Comparing Constitutions: Ideas, Ideals, and Ideology – toward a Layered Narrative”. International Journal of Constitutional Law 3: 439–459.
Google Scholar
Gadgiev, Gadis. 2004. Konstitutsionnye printsipy rynochnoy èkonomiki. (Razvitie osnov grazhdanskogo prava v resheniyakh Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii). Moscow: Yurist.
Google Scholar
Gadzhiyev, Gadis. 1999. “Pravovye pozitsii Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii kak istochnik konstitutsionnogo prava”. Konstitutsionnoe pravo: vostochnoevropeyskoe obozrenie 3: 81–95.
Google Scholar
Greer, Steven. Luzius Wildhaber. 2012. “Revisiting the Debate about ‘constitutionalising’ the European Court of Human Rights”. Human Rights Law Review 12: 655–687.
Google Scholar
Henderson, Jane. 2007. “The Russian Constitutional Court and the Communist Party Case: Watershed or Whitewash”. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 40: 1–16.
Google Scholar
Khorunzhij, Sergey. 2014. “Konstitutsionnaya ideologiya kak èlement pravovoy sredy”. Gosudarstvennaya vlast’ i mestnoe samoupravlenie 10: 3–5.
Google Scholar
Kryazhkov, Vladimir. 1999. Konstitutsionnoe pravosudie v subyektakh Rossiyskoy Federatsii: pravovye osnovy i praktika. Moscow: Formula prava.
Google Scholar
Mańko, Rafał. 2005. “The Culture of Private Law in Central Europe After Enlargement: A Polish Perspective”. European Law Journal 11: 527–548.
Google Scholar
Mańko, Rafał. 2013. “Weeds in the Gardens of Justice? The Survival of Hyperpositivism in Polish Legal Culture as a Symptom/Sinthome”. Journal of Law, Literature and Culture 7(2): 207–233.
Google Scholar
Marchenko, Mikhail. 2011. Sudebnoe pravotvorchestvo i sudeyskoe pravo. Moscow: Prospect.
Google Scholar
Morshchakova, Tamara. 1995. Sudebnaya reforma: yuridichesky professionalizm i problemy yuridicheskogo obrazovaniya. Moscow: Prior.
Google Scholar
Nesmeianova, Svetlana. 2004. Konstitutsionny sudebny kontrol’ v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: problemy teorii i praktiki. Ekaterinburg: Ural State Law Academy Publisher.
Google Scholar
Pojarkov, Sergey. 2013. “Tsennostnye osnovaniya ideologii rossiyskogo konstitutsionalizma”. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal’noe pravo 6: 18–20.
Google Scholar
Polyakov, Leonid. 2007. “‘Suverennaya demokratiya’: politichesky fakt kak teoreticheskaya predmetnost’”. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’ 2: 59–68.
Google Scholar
Richardson, James. Marat Shterin. 2008. “Constitutional Courts in Postcommunist Russia and Hungary: How Do They Treat Religion?” Religion, State and Society 36: 251–267.
Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, Michel. 1998. Just Interpretations: Law Between Ethics and Politics. California: University of California Press.
Google Scholar
Sadurski, Wojciech. 2012. Constitutionalism and the Enlargement of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Scheppele, Kim Lane. 2003. “Constitutional Negotiations: Political Contexts of Judicial Activism in Post-Soviet Europe”. International Sociology 18(1): 219–238.
Google Scholar
Trochev, Alexei. 2011 Judging Russia. The Role of the Constitutional Court in Russian Politics 1990–2006. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Van de Heyning, Catherine. 2012. “The Natural ‘Home’ of Fundamental Rights Adjudication: Constitutional Challenges to the European Court of Human Rights”. Yearbook of European Law 31(1): 112–127.
Google Scholar
Varga, Csaba. 2014. “The Changing Judicial Patterns in Central Europe”. Acta Juridica Hungarica 55(2): 87–106.
Google Scholar
Wildhaber, Luzius. 2007. “The European Convention on Human Rights and International Law”. International and Comparative Law 56(2): 217–231.
Google Scholar
Zorkin, Valery. 2013. Pravo v usloviyakh global’nykh peremen: monografiya. Moscow: Norma.
Google Scholar
Belov, Sergey. 2014. Soblyudenie sudami pravovykh pozitsy Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF, svyazannykh s tolkovaniem deystvuyushchego zakonodatel’stva. http://monitoring.law.edu.ru/kategorii_del/processualnoe_pravo/soblyudenie_sudami_pravovyh_pozicij_konstitucionnogo_suda_rf_svyazannyh_s_tolkovaniem_dejstvuyuwego_zakonodatelstva/ [Accessed: 19.12.2016].
Google Scholar
Matczak, Marcin. 2016. Why Judicial Formalism is Incompatible with the Rule of Law. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2831477 [Accessed: 29.06.2019].
Google Scholar
Novosti «Èkha Moskvy». Sud’ya Konstitutsionnogo Suda Anatoly Kononov pokidaet KS v nachale sleduyushchego goda. http://echo.msk.ru/news/638554-echo.html [Accessed: 19.02.2017].
Google Scholar
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.