“It Is a Nomos Very Different from the Law”: on Anarchy and the Law

Christos Marneros

doi:10.18778/0208-6069.96.10

Autor

Christos Marneros University of Kent https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4667-2454

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.96.10

Słowa kluczowe:

anarchia, prawo, nomos, instytucje, Deleuze

Abstrakt

Relacja pomiędzy anarchią a prawem jest, delikatnie mówiąc, niewygodna. Tak zwane „klasyczne” stanowisko anarchistyczne – we wszystkich jego heterogenicznych tendencjach – charakteryzuje się zazwyczaj całkowitym sprzeciwem wobec prawa. Jednakże, pomimo swojego nieocenionego wkładu i nieustannie aktualnej krytyki stanu rzeczy, ta „klasyczna” pozycja anarchistyczna musi zostać ponownie zbadana i ponownie wyartykułowana, jeśli ma stanowić skuteczną przeszkodę dla obecnych (i bardzo złożonych) mechanizmów dominacji i opresji dogmatyzmu i dominacji prawa. Biorąc pod uwagę powyższe wyzwania, w niniejszym artykule analizuję i rozwijam dwa pojęcia myśli filozoficznej Gilles’a Deleuze’a, a mianowicie pojęcie instytucji oraz pojęcie nomosu nomadów. W ten sposób chcę na nowo przemyśleć relację między anarchią a prawem i ostatecznie wskazać na etyczno-polityczne ujęcie tego, co nazywam an-archicznym nomosem, który wymyka się (lub przynajmniej próbuje) dogmatyzmowi i „archistycznej” mentalności prawa.

Pobrania

Brak dostępnych danych do wyświetlenia.

Bibliografia

Agamben, Giorgio. 1993. The Coming Community. Translated by Michael Hardt. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Google Scholar

Agamben, Giorgio. 2019. Creation and Anarchy: The Work of Art and Religion of Capitalism. Translated by Adam Kotsko. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503609273
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503609273

Anonymous. 2011. Enemies of Society: An Anthology of Individualist and Egoist Thought. San Francisco: Ardent Press.
Google Scholar

Bakunin, Mikhail. 1964. The Political Philosophy of Bakunin: Scientific Anarchism. Translated and Edited by G.P. Marximoff. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.
Google Scholar

Benjamin, Walter. 1986. “Critique of Violence.” Translated by Edmund Jephcott. In Reflections: Essays, Aphorisms, Autobiographical Writings. 277–300. Edited by Peter Demetz. New York: Schocken Books.
Google Scholar

Bonanno, Alfredo M. 2009. Insurrectionalist Anarchism: Part One. Translated by Jean Weir. London: Elephant Editions.
Google Scholar

Caroll, Lewis. 2015. The Complete Alice. Basingstoke: Macmillan Children’s Book.
Google Scholar

Châtelet, Gilles. 2014. To Live and Think Like Pigs: The Incitement of Envy and Boredom in Market Democracies. Translated by Robin Mackay. New York: Sequence Press.
Google Scholar

Colson, Daniel. 2019. A Little Philosophical Lexicon of Anarchism: From Proudhon to Deleuze. Translated by Jesse Cohn. New York: Minor Compositions.
Google Scholar

Culp, Andrew. 2016. Dark Deleuze. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.5749/9781452958392
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5749/9781452958392

Deleuze, Gilles. 1991. Empiricism and Subjectivity: An Essay on Hume’s Theory of Human Nature. Translated by Constantin V. Boundas. New York: Columbia University Press.
Google Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles. 1991. Masochism: Coldness and Cruelty. Translated Jean McNeil. New Jersey: Zone Books.
Google Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles. 1994. Difference and Repetition. Translated by Paul Patton. New York: Columbia University Press.
Google Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles. 1995. Negotiations. Translated by Martin Joughin. New York: Columbia University Press.
Google Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles. 1998. Essays Critical and Clinical. Translated by Daniel Smith, Michael Greco. London–New York: Verso.
Google Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles. 2001. Spinoza: Practical Philosophy. Translated by Robert Hurley. San Francisco: City Lights Publishers.
Google Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles. 2007. Two Regimes of Madness: Essays and Interviews 1975–1995. Translated by Ames Hodges, Mike Taormina. Los Angeles CA: Semiotext(e).
Google Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles. 2015. Logic of Sense. Translated by Constantin V. Boundas, Mark Lester, Charles J. Stivale. London: Bloomsbury.
Google Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles. Félix Guattari. 1986. Nomadology: The War Machine. Translated by Brian Massumi. Los Angeles CA: Semiotext(e).
Google Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles. Félix Guattari. 1994. What Is Philosophy?. Translated by Graham Burchell, Hugh Tomlinson. London–New York: Verso.
Google Scholar

Dosse, François. 2010. Deleuze and Guattari: Intersecting Lives. Translated by Deborah Glassman. New York: Columbia University Press.
Google Scholar

Fadini, Ubaldo. 2019. “Deleuze’s Notion of The Institution: In A Direction of Different Distance.” Deleuze & Guattari Studies 13(4): 528–540. https://doi.org/10.3366/dlgs.2019.0378
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/dlgs.2019.0378

Feral Faun. 2010. Feral Revolution. London: Elephant Editions.
Google Scholar

Ford, Russell. 2016. “Humor, Law and Jurisprudence.” Angelaki 21(3): 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969725X.2016.1205263
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969725X.2016.1205263

Gray van Heerden, Chantelle. Aragorn Eloff. Eds. 2019. Deleuze and Anarchism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474439077.001.0001
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474439077.001.0001

Hobbes, Thomas. 1986. Leviathan. London: Penguin Classics.
Google Scholar

Kropotkin, Pyotr. 1975. “Law and Authority.” In The Essential Kropotkin. 27–43. Edited by Emile Capouya, Keitha Tompkins. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02959-4_3
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02959-4_3

Landstreicher, Wolfi. 2009. Willful Disobedience. San Francisco: Ardent Press.
Google Scholar

Lefebvre, Alexandre. 2008. The Image of Law: Deleuze, Bergson, Spinoza. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503627246

Loizidou, Elena. 2011. “This Is What Democracy Looks Like.” In How Not To Be Governed: Readings And Interpretations From A Critical Anarchist Left. 167–187. Edited by Jimmy Class Clausen, James Martel. New York: Rowman & Littlefield International.
Google Scholar

Loizidou, Elena. 2018. “Love, Law, Anarchy.” In Law and Philosophical Theory: Critical Intersections. 167–182. Edited by Thanos Zartaloudis. New York: Rowman & Littlefield International.
Google Scholar

Loizidou, Elena. 2019. “What is Law?” In Anarchist Imagination: Anarchism Encounters the Humanities and the Social Sciences. 181–193. Edited by Carl Levy, Saul Newman. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315693163-11
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315693163-11

Newman, Saul. 2012. “Anarchism and Law: Towards a Post-Anarchist Ethics of Disobedience.” Griffith Law Review 21(2): 307–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2012.10854742
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2012.10854742

Proudhon, Pierre-Joseph. 2005. “The Authority Principle.” In No Gods, No Masters: An Anthology of Anarchism. 81–98. Edited by Daniel Guerin, Paul Sharkey. Edinburgh: AK Press.
Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl. 2006. The Nomos of the Earth: in the International Law of the Jus Publicum Europaeum. Translated by G.L. Ulmen. New York: Telos Press Publishing.
Google Scholar

Sellars, John. 2007. “Deleuze and Cosmopolitanism.” Radical Philosophy 142: 30–37.
Google Scholar

Serafinski. 2016. Blessed is the Flame: An Introduction to Concentration Camp Resistance and Anarcho-nihilism. Berkeley CA: Little Black Cart.
Google Scholar

Stirner, Max. 2017. The Unique and Its Property. Translated by Wolfi Landstreicher. Middletown DE: Underworld Amusements.
Google Scholar

Tamblyn, Nathan. 2019. “The Common Ground Between Law and Anarchism.” Law Review 40: 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-019-09223-1
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-019-09223-1

The Invisible Committee. 2009. The Coming Insurrection. Los Angeles CA: Semioetext(e).
Google Scholar

Tiqqun. 2010. Introduction to Civil War. Translated by Alexander R. Galloway, Jason E. Smith. Los Angeles CA: Semiotext(e).
Google Scholar

Tosel, Natascia. 2019. “Anarchy and Institution: A New Sadean Possibility.” In Deleuze and Anarchism. 136–154. Edited by Chantelle Gray van Heerden, Aragorn Eloff. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474439077.003.0009
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474439077.003.0009

Zartaloudis, Thanos. 2019. The Birth of Nomos. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474442008.001.0001
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474442008.001.0001